“Pro-Hitler and pro-Nazi videos are racking up hundreds of millions of views”

Today is historic MPA-approved trailer for first AI film with a traditional theatrical run Gods Don't Give Gifts is R-Rated Submitting for Best Animated Feature Oscar --> Variety article @Gossip_Goblin @fableshowrunner

Why men -- especially conservative men -- won't go to therapy: The weird thing about the American Psychological Association (APA) is that every objective observer has known that it's been ideologically captured by the Left since the 1970s. That's the main reason why the Association for Psychological Science split off back in 1988, to form a more-scientific, less-politicized version of APA. Yet, here we are, 40 years later -- with APA still the main accrediting body that gives its seal of approval to PhD programs that train the vast majority of licensed clinical psychologists in America. APA sets the agenda. It determines what gets covered in graduate courses. It runs the most influential journals and conferences. It sets the whole political and ideological tone for psychological research. For decades, it has pushed political correctness, 'affirmative action', wokeness, DEI, and Leftist political causes. APA also ignores, censors, and/or demonizes the psychological research areas that are politically incorrect, but that replicate well (e.g. intelligence research, behavior genetics, evolutionary psychology, sex differences). There are alternatives. For example, the Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System (PCSAS) focuses more on the real science -- evidence-based treatments and interventions -- rather than on the Leftist activism of APA. But, for the moment, the APA's ideological agenda still dominates American clinical psychology. This partly explains the feedback loop between clinical psychology becoming so feminized (with women getting about 80% of clinical psychology PhDs), and clinical psychology becoming so radical-Leftist in its politics. And it explains why it's pretty difficult to find licensed clinical psychologists who are actually sympathetic to men, conservatives, and/or Christians. This is one big reason why men won't go to therapy -- they don't want to deal with a (probably female, probably liberal) therapist who has been indoctrinated into wokeness for 5-6 years throughout her graduate training.

1% of the population, but 34% of drug peddling. 1% of the population, but 47% of robberies. 1% of the population, but 47% of crooked games of chance. 1% of the population, but 82% of organized crime. 1% of the population, but 98% dealers of prostitution.

💯🙌 Fantastic post. Few people understand what's happening. Communism simply morphed into Globalism and our Western leaders betrayed us to the same rootless, international clique that ran the Bolshevik revolution. God help us.

While this is not new, the continuation of this zero-sum game will end up catching up to the Western elite. There is no scenario where these wimps are not wiped out by the more aggressive Chinese, Indian, and Middle Eastern versions of themselves within the next decade.

Globalism meant Western factories closed, borders opened and jobs relocated to wherever it was cheaper and convenient. The industrial worker in Vienna, the Ruhr region, or Ohio, became unemployed or was pushed into low-wage service sector work. Yet profits ballooned for the corporate middlemen, who produce nothing. Financial conglomerates, importers, logistics giants, tech platforms and consultants have pocketed the margin between cheap production in Asia (China) and expensive sales in the West. The result is a super-rich global elite and a left-behind, indebted proletariat. The middle class—the backbone of every free society—was crushed. This represents the greatest surge in inequality in a century. Without globalism, China would never have risen. The West gave China everything, including its 2001 admission to the WTO, even though China lacked a true market economy, democracy or rule-of-law system. It was a voluntary technology transfer: anyone who wanted to produce in China was forced to hand over their intellectual property. Yet now it seems that the Chinese were right all along. The West looked the other way on forced labor, state subsidies, currency manipulation and technology theft. Capital on a scale of trillions of dollars has been pumped directly into China. Isn't this known as being entrepreneurial? The West dismantled its own industrial base and rebuilt in China. The West financed what it claims is a totalitarian state, which uses Western money to rearm, buy up strategic ports, monopolise raw materials and exercise leverage over us. Wouldn't we do exactly the same? China did not rise despite the West, but because the globalist West built it that way. Short-term profit was prioritised over national security, industrial sovereignty, and local workforce stability. A rootless, stateless elite in New York, Brussels, Berlin, and Shanghai feels at home everywhere and takes responsibility nowhere. In its wake are stranded communities, stripped of industry and upward mobility, entirely dependent on supply chains controlled by a foreign power. Globalism was sold with a promise of prosperity. In reality, it was the greatest - yet most absurd - redistribution of wealth in human history.

Thank you Tesla FSD for saving my life. I looked at the car coming to the stop sign figured they would stop, my car went, then came to a stop mid intersection as they flew by. Had I been manually driving this would have resulted in a crash.

FSD Supervised preventing T-bone crash

Dans 50 ans, les livres d'histoire diront qu'Elon Musk a gagné une guerre que personne ne savait qu'on était en train de perdre. Une guerre commencée il y a 100 ans, dans une cellule de prison italienne. En 1926, Mussolini fait arrêter un intellectuel sarde de 35 ans. Au procès, le procureur aurait dit : « Nous devons empêcher ce cerveau de fonctionner pendant vingt ans. » Il s'appelait Antonio Gramsci. Son cerveau n'a jamais cessé de fonctionner. En prison, il a rempli des milliers de pages qui sont devenues l'un des textes politiques les plus influents du XXe siècle. Je pense qu'on est en train de vivre le moment où sa théorie s'effondre. Laissez-moi vous expliquer. Gramsci se posait une question simple. Pourquoi la révolution communiste a-t-elle réussi en Russie mais échoué partout en Occident ? Sa réponse : en Occident, le pouvoir ne tient pas seulement par l'État, la police et l'armée. Il tient par la culture. Par ce que les gens trouvent normal, évident, « de bon sens ». Il appelle ça l'hégémonie culturelle. Donc, pour prendre le pouvoir, il ne faut pas d'abord prendre le palais. Il faut d'abord prendre les esprits. Les écoles. Les universités. Les journaux. Le théâtre. L'édition. Les tribunaux. C'est la « guerre de position » : une conquête lente, institution par institution. Quand la culture a basculé, la politique suit toute seule. Quarante ans plus tard, l'activiste allemand Rudi Dutschke en fera un slogan : la longue marche à travers les institutions. Pendant des décennies, on a vécu avec une énigme que personne n'arrivait vraiment à expliquer. Pourquoi presque tous les artistes sont-ils de gauche ? Les acteurs, les chanteurs, les profs, les journalistes, une bonne partie de la magistrature. Pourquoi un pays pouvait voter à droite élection après élection et voir quand même sa culture parler d'une seule voix ? On nous répondait : « c'est parce que les gens éduqués sont de gauche. » Je crois que la réponse est plus simple. Gramsci avait écrit la recette, et elle a été appliquée. Quand tu contrôles qui obtient la subvention, le poste, la bonne critique, le prix, l'invitation sur le plateau, tu contrôles ce qui devient « la culture ». La même énigme existait à l'échelle du monde. Pourquoi tant de pays en développement, notamment en Amérique latine, revotaient-ils encore et encore pour des gouvernements socialistes ou de gauche radicale ? Venezuela, Bolivie, Nicaragua, l'Argentine des Kirchner, la Colombie de Petro. L'économie s'effondrait, les cartels prospéraient, le chaos s'installait. Et pourtant le même vote revenait. Ma conviction : la pauvreté n'était pas un accident du système. C'était un électorat. Et autour, il y avait tout un écosystème d'ONG, de médias « indépendants » et de programmes de « société civile », financé en grande partie par l'argent occidental. Puis, début 2025, il s'est passé quelque chose que personne n'avait jamais osé faire. Elon et DOGE ont ouvert les livres de USAID. Une agence quasi intouchable depuis 1961, des dizaines de milliards de dollars par an. La grande majorité des programmes ont été coupés, et l'agence a été absorbée par le Département d'État. Le robinet a été fermé. Et regardez ce qui s'est passé depuis. Bolivie : le MAS perd le pouvoir après presque vingt ans. Équateur : Noboa réélu. Honduras : la droite reprend le pays. Chili : Kast élu. Argentine : Milei remporte largement les élections de mi-mandat. Et il y a deux jours, le Brésil. Jair Bolsonaro est inéligible, condamné à 27 ans de prison. La gauche pensait avoir refermé le chapitre. Lula, 80 ans, briguait un quatrième mandat face à un pays qu'on disait acquis. Dimanche, son fils Flávio est arrivé en tête du premier tour. Plus de 47 % contre près de 45 % pour Lula. Lula lui-même a reconnu un résultat « inattendu ». Le plus grand pays d'Amérique latine est à un second tour de basculer. Le plus grand virage à droite du continent depuis des décennies. Coïncidence ? Je ne crois pas. Quand le financement disparaît, le récit perd ses haut-parleurs. Il reste un dernier vrai bastion. L'Europe. Bruxelles finance ses propres réseaux d'ONG, avec une opacité que même la Cour des comptes européenne a pointée. Les grandes fondations comme l'Open Society de Soros. Les entités supranationales qui produisent de la norme sans jamais passer devant un électeur. C'est la dernière forteresse de l'hégémonie culturelle. Et elle commence à se fissurer. Je suis convaincu que tout ça va s'effondrer, et plus vite qu'on ne le pense. Gramsci avait raison sur un point essentiel : la culture précède la politique. Mais il avait oublié que ça marche dans les deux sens. Quand une culture artificielle perd ses perfusions, ce qu'il y a de vrai en dessous remonte à la surface. Ce qui vient après, je crois que c'est une renaissance. Une culture qui recommence à aimer la beauté, l'ambition, la science, la civilisation qui l'a fait naître. Et dans les livres d'histoire, on se souviendra que tout a commencé quand un homme a décidé de regarder les comptes. Il fallait quelqu'un d'assez riche pour ne dépendre de personne, d'assez fou pour s'y attaquer et d'assez libre pour encaisser la haine qui allait suivre. Merci Elon.

When Elon Musk showed he’s a master of reverse psychology after someone asked, “Why should I invest in Tesla rather than Mercedes-Benz?

VIEWER'S GUIDE Preferred viewing method: widescreen on your phone, or on a computer monitor. This video is heavily redacted on purpose. I've read the rules of several social media companies. Without the tape, what's in this video, even though it's factual, would get you heavily throttled or your content removed. The cases, the Muslim rape gangs, the quotes and the stats are all real. The people on screen are AI, depicting what happened. EASTER EGGS 0:00 There's a camera in her music box. Orwell's telescreen, cute edition. 0:06 Her clock flips to 13:00. 1984 opens with the clocks striking thirteen. 0:08 "Remember, remember" is the Guy Fawkes rhyme that opens V for Vendetta. Every camera is dated November 5. 0:38 Big Brother's asleep. Big Sister is watching you. 2:06 Her copy of 1984 is stamped INSTRUCTION MANUAL. 2:22 All three chants are real British slogans. Keep Calm and Carry On came from the Ministry of Information, Orwell's model for the Ministry of Truth. 2:33 Room 101, where 1984 breaks you with your worst fear. Here it's your deleted posts, and your mum reads them all. The end: the camera turns around. You're logged too. WHAT REALLY HAPPENED 0:28 Keir Starmer, February 2025: free speech "will last for a very, very long time." So will your sentence. 0:35 Darren Brady, army veteran, handcuffed at home in 2022 over a meme. Told "someone has been caused anxiety." 0:57 Allison Pearson. Police at her door on Remembrance Sunday 2024 over a year-old post. 1:20 13,200 "non-crime hate incidents" logged in one year. 1:26 Harry Miller. Police logged a "hate incident" over a limerick he retweeted. The High Court ruled they acted unlawfully. 1:30 Isabel Vaughan-Spruce. Arrested twice for praying silently, in her head. The officer (1:35): "You've said you're engaging in prayer, which is the offence." Charged again in December 2025, trial set for October 6 to 9. 1:41 March 2026: the government adopted a definition of "anti-Muslim hostility." Critics call it a blasphemy rule by another name. 1:51 The Muslim rape gangs. For years they raped and trafficked girls across England while police and councils looked away. At least 1,400 children in Rotherham alone. Baroness Casey's 2025 audit found agencies avoided examining ethnicity "for fear of appearing racist." The number under the tape? Lord Pearson, House of Lords, 2018. Look it up. 2:12 Council elections postponed in 2025, then 30 more in 2026, until a court challenge reinstated them. 2:52 Peter Kyle, Tech Secretary, July 2025: "If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that." 3:03 Sir Mark Rowley, Met Police Commissioner, August 2024: "Committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you." THE 62,000 IN THE CAPTION At least 62,199 arrests for communications offences in the UK, 2021 to 2025. Big Brother Watch, "Britain's Free Speech Problem," September 2026, from Freedom of Information data from UK police forces. bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-co…

Elon Musk’s DOGE helped immensely in the fight against tyranny, not only in the United States but abroad as well.

Look at the history of the world and you will find one consistent truth that the left tries to bury under piles of academic jargon and fake morality. Communism is the ideology of the loser. It is the chosen philosophy of the insufferable loser who cannot compete, the jealous crybaby who cannot succeed, and the bitter fool who wants to drag everyone else down to their level. These people are not visionaries. They are monsters and demons who dress up their envy in the language of justice. They are the devil in a cheap suit, preaching about equality while plotting to destroy anyone better than them. And that is everyone. The communist is an evil and wicked creature. They are cruel and hateful by nature. Their entire worldview is built on being vicious, savage, and brutal to anyone who possesses what they do not. They are ruthless and merciless predators who would rather see a city burn than see a neighbor succeed through hard work. They are cold-blooded and heartless souls who view human life as expendable fuel for their failed experiments. They are soulless and demonic agents of an infernal and hellish vision that has left a trail of death across the globe. They are cursed and damned by their own stupidity and malice. The collectivist, consumed by a bitter and jealous rage, chooses instead to weaponize his own inadequacy. He views achievement and strength with a spiteful, venomous resentment, seeking to drag excellence down into the mud of equal misery. The track record of this ideology reveals its true architecture. Beneath polished academic rhetoric lies a corrosive, destructive doctrine rooted in weakness and fragile vanity. The activist acts like an insufferable crybaby, demanding that civilization rearrange itself to subsidize his mediocrity. When that demand fails, the mask slips to expose a ruthless, cold-blooded apparatus. From the Soviet gulags to the Cambodian killing fields, the practical execution of this dogma produced a dark, grim reality that left millions dead, economies ruined, and human potential shattered. Collectivism operates as a toxic rot within the body politic. It preys on the insecure and the desperate, providing moral cover for state-sanctioned theft and bureaucratic subjugation. Its utopian promises inevitably deliver an infernal, bleak wasteland governed by paranoia, scarcity, and violent coercion. A free people defends its future by seeing this philosophy for what it truly is: an organized rebellion of the envious against the capable, designed to punish greatness and crown the incompetent.

Andrew Tate is funny.

No CEO on the planet would post that. Thats what makes you different to anyone else. You actually care and want to this backward civilisation to prosper

A man who passed his medical in 1996 with flying colours has four diseases today, and not one number in his body has changed. Blood pressure 135/85. Cholesterol 210. Fasting blood sugar 105. BMI of 26. In 1996 that was a clean bill of health and a handshake. Today the same man, with the same blood, is hypertensive, has high cholesterol, is prediabetic and overweight. Four diagnoses, and he never caught a thing. 1997: the line for diabetes drops from 140 to 126. 1.7 million new diabetics by morning. 1997: high blood pressure drops from 160/100 to 140/90. 13 million new patients. 1998: high cholesterol drops from 240 to 200. 42 million new patients. 1998: overweight drops from a BMI of 27 to 25. 29 million people go to bed normal and wake up with a weight problem. 2003: prediabetes is widened from 110 to 100. It now covers 98 million Americans, more than 1 adult in 3, for a condition the World Health Organization declines to call by that name. 2017: blood pressure again, down to 130/80. Another 31 million. Nearly half the adults in America are hypertensive. When the cholesterol targets were tightened again in 2004, eight of the nine men who wrote them had been paid by companies that make statins. No germ. No outbreak. No change in a single artery. Just a room, a vote, and a tablet waiting on the far side of every line. In every other branch of medicine you have to get ill to become a patient. In this one they bring the disease to you. The last healthy people are the ones who haven't been tested yet.

Thanks, Peter! This is the beginning of the end for destructive wildfires. In a country that loses ~$500B every year to wildfires, even tiny gains make for huge savings, to say nothing of the incalculable value of lives and homes.