Yonatan Sompolinsky – The Mind Behind Scalable Decentralization and Kaspa🧠 —With 4,223 citations on Google Scholar, Yonatan Sompolinsky has cemented his role as a foundational thinker in blockchain scalability and distributed systems. “The minds behind Kaspa aren’t just anybody. These are the architects who saw the limits of traditional blockchains and dared to reimagine them. They didn’t follow trends — they set new standards. Backed by peer-reviewed research and real academic firepower, they built Kaspa not for hype, but for history. This isn’t just another crypto project — it’s what happens when the brightest minds in distributed systems decide decentralization deserves better.” Study Kaspa. Think Kaspa💡 $Kas #Kaspa $Btc

internet money should move at internet speed.

x402 on Kaspa could become one of the largest catalysts for actual network growth because it connects Kaspa directly to the economic layer autonomous agents are going to need. The important part is not simply that an AI can “pay with KAS.” x402 turns payment into part of the request itself. An agent requests an API, model, dataset, compute job or tool, receives a machine-readable 402 price, authorizes payment, and continues automatically. No subscription, invoice, checkout page or human intervention is required. That changes the addressable market for Kaspa considerably. Today most cryptocurrency payments are initiated by humans relatively infrequently. Agents operate differently. An autonomous agent could make hundreds or thousands of economically distinct requests per day: purchasing inference, querying proprietary data, renting compute, paying another agent, accessing an MCP tool, buying storage or settling some automated service. Machine commerce potentially transforms payments from occasional user events into continuous background infrastructure. Kaspa is unusually suited to this model. Its high-frequency Proof-of-Work blockDAG provides fast settlement without abandoning a UTXO architecture, while x402 can expose KAS through the same standardized payment lifecycle agents already understand. The Kaspa implementation supports ordinary native payments while also developing batch-settlement mechanisms for much smaller repeated payments, where funding can be committed once and multiple requests accounted for efficiently. This also connects directly to Kaspa’s long-term economic problem: generating meaningful transaction demand. Agents do not need to speculate on KAS for x402 to matter. They need KAS because an API, compute provider or machine service accepts it. That produces transactional demand, fees, wallet infrastructure, liquidity and ultimately more economic density on the network. The real opportunity is therefore bigger than “AI payments.” If the agentic economy develops as expected, x402 could make Kaspa one of its native settlement rails. Instead of convincing machines to use Kaspa, developers simply make KAS one of the payment options their agents already know how to negotiate.

the first vprog on kaspa

If you don't own Kaspa, you're doing it all wrong.

Someone should let @DigitalAssets know about $KAS

I suspect one of the biggest questions an institution evaluating Kaspa would ask has very little to do with whether the technology works. Kaspa has already demonstrated high-frequency Proof of Work, 10 BPS operation, fast confirmation, and substantial unused transaction capacity. The harder question is economic: who is going to consume that capacity? Kaspa’s security budget is still overwhelmingly subsidy-driven. That matters because Kaspa’s emission schedule is unusually aggressive. Roughly 95% of the eventual supply has already been mined, and issuance continues declining geometrically toward effectively zero. The long-term security model therefore increasingly depends on transaction fees becoming meaningful enough to compensate miners as subsidy disappears. Right now, that fee market is still extremely immature. Recent standard transaction activity has been roughly 1–2 TPS while the network is capable of processing vastly more. That is excellent from a user-experience standpoint because blockspace is cheap and abundant, but from a security-budget perspective it means there is currently little competition for that blockspace. This is why I think Kaspa outreach should increasingly target builders before institutions. DeFi protocols create settlement transactions. DePIN networks generate machine payments, attestations and economic events. AI agents potentially generate enormous quantities of autonomous micropayments, escrow transactions, service purchases and machine-to-machine coordination. Toccata, covenants, Silverscript and eventually higher-level tooling like Argent give these applications increasingly sophisticated ways to use Kaspa directly. Those are the boots on the ground. An institution can buy KAS, but an application can generate millions of transactions. And millions of economically meaningful transactions create fees, liquidity, infrastructure, wallets, users and observable demand for blockspace. If Kaspa wants institutional adoption, the strongest argument may not be convincing institutions first. It may be building an economy underneath them that becomes impossible to ignore.

new update dropped

kaspa is an open network for money and apps, secured by proof of work. you can transact without needing anyone’s approval. devs can build assets and contracts with rules the network itself enforces. miners compete to produce blocks through computing power and electricity, not the size of their KAS wallet. an attacker trying to undo a confirmed transaction has to compete against the combined mining power of the entire honest network while it keeps mining. even then, they can’t make nodes accept transactions that break the rules. kaspa includes and orders blocks mined in parallel, so miners blocks aren’t discarded simply for losing a race. those frequent blocks let the network reach agreement in seconds while keeping bitcoin’s proof-of-work security principles. kaspa calls this real-time decentralization.

⏰ "Trying to fill @Dr_Gonzo_K's shoes" GIVEAWAY #1 ⏰ 📅 Start: Today, September 21st, 2026 🏁 Ends: September 30th, 2026 🎁 Reward: 1,000 kaspa:native (x2) 🌟 NFT points required: 10 We are live folks! Kaspa is breaking out so lets run the race with the chart. Bring kaspa:native to the people. Lets see your best marketing efforts. Entry Requirements: - must hold the minimum number of NFT points to participate. - your marketing must be in a public place or somewhere people are going to frequently see it to qualify. - include a short description telling us where you placed it (e.g. shopping mall, bus shelter, café, bar, university campus). -- Reward Rates Tiers: • Operative — 100% • Vanguard — 110% • Legendary — 120% • Mythic — 130% -- If you believe an entry is AI-generated or not genuine, report it in the comments for community review.

Holy shit. The era of CBDC is here. The transition to a cashless society is a deliberate attack on your freedom. We need decentralized money more than ever. kaspa:native and bitcoin:native aren’t speculative tokens. They’re life rafts. Plan accordingly.

kaspa:native Kaspa is going to start a Monster Run! I believe kaspa:native is going to make a lot of people mad for being sidelined. Are you Bullish on kaspa:native? #kas #crypto #kaspa

Study Kaspa.

we were cooking the whole time

Kaspaexplained.com/moose Or kaspaexplained.com/satoshis-… In memory of @MikoGenno our very own PlanK who asked "where does the power law come from? What builds it?" To then only measure price while it goes much much deeper. Wherever you are. Read this. I came to this space because Bitcoin and crypto was a tulip mania that persisted. One price bubble is meaningless, two? a coincidence of our time, perhaps. three? How can it persist?! There is something underneath that isn't explained anywhere else. So i did the work, i looked at the data and the incentives, the incentive structure, the incentive token, i looked at how people acted accordingly. Charlie Munger couldn't be more right when he said: "show me the incentive and i'll show you the outcome" he was focused on businesses, one company at a time, never a global monetary network with no CEO and no worker paid beyond their contribution. The question is the incentive, Satoshi showed a design for how to build the perfect one, @hashdag gave a better smoother design, @michaelsuttonil and the core of today took the flag and ran with it. Crazy bastards. How does one make a zero-sum game meaningful? That's their problem. I'm just here to interpret the machine of what they all accidently built. Satoshi might not be around anymore, but do you know what you did Yonathan? Do you grasp it Michael? I don't discourage the global minecraft-like sandbox created by core with covenants and accompanying ZK. it's an engine, within an engine, within an engine. For the coming builders who builds next: "Whatever seems good to you and your brethren to do with the rest of the silver and gold, do according to the will of your God." #kaspa $kas #bitcoin $btc

we are all kaspa

#Kaspa ticker kaspa:native

The most interesting thing happening with Kaspa right now is that its individual components are beginning to reveal a much larger architecture. Kaspa is not simply adding programmability to a fast PoW network. It is gradually building a system where concurrency exists from consensus all the way up into application execution. Think about the direction. GHOSTDAG already allows blocks to exist concurrently rather than forcing the network into a single-file chain. Toccata brought stateful covenants into the UTXO model, allowing independent pieces of state to evolve without introducing one enormous global state machine. SilverScript v1 now makes those state transitions readable and practical to write. Argent takes another step by representing applications as actors that consume, observe and create other stateful UTXOs atomically. Meanwhile vProgs is actively developing scheduling, resource dependency tracking, parallel execution, rollback and verifiable computation infrastructure. DAGKnight, still under development, attacks the ordering problem from the consensus side by adapting to actual network conditions. The common denominator is concurrency. Most smart-contract architectures begin with a global computer and then spend years trying to parallelize it. Kaspa is approaching the problem from almost the opposite direction: start with parallel consensus, preserve independent state, explicitly describe dependencies, and only serialize the pieces of computation that actually conflict. That distinction could become extremely important in an economy increasingly populated by autonomous software. Millions of agents do not need one giant shared computer. They need independent resources, bounded authority, atomic coordination, verifiable computation and a neutral ordering layer. Kaspa may ultimately be building something more interesting than “smart contracts on PoW.” It may be building a decentralized operating system for concurrent economic activity.