Six "miracles" atheists believe in, except I don’t actually believe most of the propositions you’ve helpfully assigned to me.
I don’t claim the universe came from philosophical "nothing". I don’t think physical order arising through lawful processes is a miracle. Abiogenesis is an unresolved scientific problem, not "therefore magic". Personality and reason are things brains demonstrably do, however incomplete our account of consciousness remains. And morality is a problem in metaethics, not a substance somebody has to manufacture out of atoms.
What’s doing most of the work here is the same move repeated six times: "I don’t know how X could arise naturally, therefore a mind must have made X." That’s not six arguments. It’s one argument from ignorance wearing six different hats.
And the proposed cure is wonderfully convenient: posit an invisible, disembodied, eternal, rational, moral supermind to explain why minds, reason and morality exist, then declare that this entity itself requires no explanation.
That isn’t solving the mystery. It’s exempting your preferred mystery from the rules you’ve just imposed on everyone else.
So here’s the challenge: pick the strongest one of your six, state it as an actual argument with premises rather than slogans, and show me exactly where "therefore God" follows. I’ll happily deal with it tomorrow.