Grateful to the UN Special Rapporteur on the issue of the Independence of Judges and Lawyers for raising what BASL, the legal fraternity and this Opposition have said for weeks.
We have to ask the simple question: why must this extension apply to the judges already sitting on the bench today?
A government does not spend its political capital on a two-year adjustment unless it knows exactly whose two years it is buying.
And everyone needs to understand what this means. If a government can decide how long a judge stays, that judge is no longer fully free to rule against the government.
1.1 million cases are pending. Not one is fixed by this amendment.
If the Govt insists on the extension, they should have a Referendum, as the Supreme Court required in 2022. But first explain it to the people, in plain language, in Sinhala, Tamil and English what the implications are, before people can vote on the matter.
UN raises Red Flag over Sri Lanka’s move to Extend Sitting Judges’ Tenure
Read :
newswire.lk/azel