🤖 AI Tools, News & Workflows
⚡ Testing AI so you don’t have to
🧠 Practical AI tips for creators & builders
📩 DM for collaborations⤵️ laboniislam677978@gmail.com
👑 25,000 strong!
Grateful for every follow, every interaction, and everyone who’s been part of the journey.
We’re just getting started. 🚀
Next milestone: 50K.
If you’re here early, you’re part of the story. ❤️
#25K#XTwitter#Community#Growth
sounds interesting .
Focusing on repeated small edges at scale rather than chasing big wins shows solid quant thinking. Interested in the full breakdowns.
A trader reportedly used Claude 5.5 Opus to build a Quant Bot — and generated +$115,615 on Polymarket.
Here’s what caught my attention:👇
• ~41,972 predictions
• ~39% win rate
• 22+ trades/hour
• ~$1,501 average daily profit
• ~$219.7K in deposits
• ~52.6% reported ROI
• 80-day performance window
The strategy wasn’t about finding one massive winner.
It was about repeating a small edge at scale.
The bot reportedly:
→ Scans short-duration crypto markets
→ Detects pricing inefficiencies
→ Enters before odds fully adjust
→ Repeats the setup across thousands of trades
Some reported winners:👇
$62 → $1,745
$28 → $1,365
$80 → $1,350
The interesting part isn’t the biggest trade.
It’s the system behind the repetition.
AI agents can potentially handle the workflow:
Scan → Analyze → Price → Execute → Monitor → Repeat
Tools like Jev Bot or Grok can be used to explore similar agent-based workflows.
🎁 GIVEAWAY
I’m sharing my complete breakdown of this Quant Bot system.
To enter:
→ Comment “QUANT”
→ Like + Repost
→ Follow @mostofakamal00
→ Stay active — I’ll DM selected winners
No follow = no DM.
Winners will be contacted within 48 hours. 🚀
A trader reportedly used Claude 5.5 Opus to build a Quant Bot — and generated +$115,615 on Polymarket.
Here’s what caught my attention:👇
• ~41,972 predictions
• ~39% win rate
• 22+ trades/hour
• ~$1,501 average daily profit
• ~$219.7K in deposits
• ~52.6% reported ROI
• 80-day performance window
The strategy wasn’t about finding one massive winner.
It was about repeating a small edge at scale.
The bot reportedly:
→ Scans short-duration crypto markets
→ Detects pricing inefficiencies
→ Enters before odds fully adjust
→ Repeats the setup across thousands of trades
Some reported winners:👇
$62 → $1,745
$28 → $1,365
$80 → $1,350
The interesting part isn’t the biggest trade.
It’s the system behind the repetition.
AI agents can potentially handle the workflow:
Scan → Analyze → Price → Execute → Monitor → Repeat
Tools like Jev Bot or Grok can be used to explore similar agent-based workflows.
🎁 GIVEAWAY
I’m sharing my complete breakdown of this Quant Bot system.
To enter:
→ Comment “QUANT”
→ Like + Repost
→ Follow @mostofakamal00
→ Stay active — I’ll DM selected winners
No follow = no DM.
Winners will be contacted within 48 hours. 🚀
AI is transforming the way we work. ⚡🤖
You don’t need 100+ tools—just 5–10 powerful ones that solve your daily needs.
Master them. Work smarter. Get more done.
🚀
🔖 Save this for later.
➕ Follow for more AI & productivity insights.
ELON MUSK JUST EXPLAINED WHY HE DOESN’T TRUST SAM ALTMAN.
“I’m not a fan of Sam Altman.”
Musk argues that OpenAI was originally created as a nonprofit, open-source AI organization meant to serve the public.
But in his view, it eventually became an ~$800 billion for-profit company with closed-source AI.
His argument is simple:
“If you gave money to support one mission, then watched the organization move in the complete opposite direction, wouldn’t you question it?”
“That’s my issue, and I think it’s a legitimate one.”
Musk also claims Anthropic was created because some OpenAI founders lost trust in Altman.
His conclusion:
“Otherwise, Anthropic wouldn’t exist.”
That’s a serious claim.
🚨 YOUR iPHONE SAYS “STORAGE FULL” AGAIN?
DON’T START DELETING YOUR PHOTOS.
A lot of storage can disappear into apps, downloads, attachments, and files you forgot about.
Before deleting your memories, check these 9 places:
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it ✅✅✅
Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do ♻️♻️♻️
Voice is quickly becoming more than a way to input text — it’s shaping up to be a more natural interface for how we interact with computers.
Typeless bringing its full desktop experience to Linux is another solid step toward that future.
Today, we're launching Typeless for Linux.
Typeless is now available on Mac, Windows, iOS, Android — and Linux.
The Linux app brings the full Typeless desktop experience, with all the core features available on Mac.
But this launch is about more than adding another platform.
For us, every new platform is another step toward a bigger goal: making voice the default way for people to interact with computers — wherever they think, create, and work.
For decades, the keyboard has been the default interface between our thoughts and computers.
And we've gotten so used to it that we rarely question the friction.
Thoughts come fast, messy, and nonlinear.
Before you communicate them, you normally have to turn them into sentences in your head first.
Then you slow everything down again to type.
We built Typeless to remove both layers of friction.
With Typeless, you can just think out loud.
Follow your thoughts wherever they go. Change your mind halfway through. Add context later. Repeat yourself. Speak imperfectly.
Typeless turns that messy stream of thought into clear, polished writing in real time.
It removes filler words and repetition, structures your ideas, adapts to your writing style, understands your personal vocabulary, and gives you writing that fits the app you're working in.
You can:
• Dictate — turn messy thoughts into clear writing, 4x faster than typing
• Translate — speak in your language and write naturally in another
• Ask anything — use your voice to write from scratch, or select text to edit it, ask questions, and take actions
• Build your dictionary — names, acronyms, and specialized terms get recognized correctly
• Personalize your style — Typeless learns how you write and adapts to where you're writing
• Speak 100+ languages — including naturally mixing languages while you talk
And it's private by design.
Linux users tend to be some of the people who spend the most time interacting deeply with computers.
Developers. Engineers. Researchers. Builders.
They should be able to use voice as naturally on Linux as anywhere else.
Our long-term belief is simple:
Voice will become the default way people interact with computers.
Not because speaking is merely faster than typing.
But because voice gives us a way to communicate with computers much closer to the speed and form in which thoughts actually happen.
To us, that's what real freedom in computing looks like: expressing what you mean without adapting how you think.
And for that future to happen, it can't belong to one device, one operating system, or one workflow.
It has to be available wherever you work.
Linux. Mac. Windows. iOS. Android.
One interface, wherever you work.
Typeless for Linux is here.
This is a really practical use of vision models. Testing it across math, code, charts, handwriting, and invoices makes the results even more interesting.
Viktor pulled 3 weeks of sales, marketing and ops data into one business review in 12 minutes this morning.
And he didn't just summarize Slack. He found the problems we actually needed to talk about.
I run a small agency team, we juggle sales, marketing and ops across a handful of clients every week.
We used to build this review by hand every Monday, pulling screenshots into a deck, and by the time we presented it half the numbers were already stale.
We tried fixing it with a template. Same deck, prefilled, so all it really saved was the formatting. Someone still had to go and find every number.
I gave Viktor one instruction: prepare our weekly business review. He pulled sales, marketing and ops into one place, wrote up a detailed analysis, and assigned action items straight to the team. The best part is I don't have to build another PPT or dashboard for the meeting.
That's roughly $4,000 a month we're not spending on a business analyst to build this deck, same review, same rigor, none of the headcount.
Viktor did the analysis inside Slack while keeping humans in control of the decisions.
This is what an AI employee looks like when he owns an actual job.
Most teams are still using AI to get answers. The bigger shift is letting AI own recurring work across the team.
AI should be taking jobs off the team's plate, not adding another tool to manage.
Hire @viktor_com for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first reply.
#AIemployee#AIagents#FutureOfWork
Paid Partnership
🚀 100 AI tools. One goal: work smarter, not harder.
From content creation to coding, design, marketing, and productivity—AI has a tool for almost everything.
Follow me @alexhalescoder for more AI information
Which AI tool do you use the most? 👇
Programme management is mostly a paperwork job pretending to be a leadership job.
Status decks, risk registers, the eleven actions that come out of every call. All of it real, none of it the work.
So I wrote out the six jobs I would hand an AI employee before I add another coordinator.
The status one earns its place immediately. He reads the commits, the tickets and the channel, and writes the status the way it actually is, not the way it was typed in on Friday afternoon.
The one that pays for itself is risk. Two workstreams needing the same engineer in the same week is a calendar problem today. Nine days later it is a slip, and by then it is in someone's board report.
No date moves and no stakeholder note goes out without me. He drafts, I decide, the trail shows both.
Six jobs in the image. Project people: which of these is eating your week right now?
Try free at @viktor_com. $100 in credits, no card. Full link in my first reply.
Paid Partnership
Broke? Jobless? Feeling stuck?
Google is paying $1,500 a day — and you don’t need a resume.
All it takes is:
📱 A phone
🌐 Internet
⏱ 5 minutes a day
✅ Like this post
💬 Comment “Google”
🔁 Retweet
👣 Make sure you’re following so I can DM you the details
99% of the AI agent tutorials on YouTube are garbage.
I’ve built 47 agents with n8n and Claude.
Here are the 3 prompts that actually work (and make agent-building simple).
Bookmark this post
🔖
Bonus: comment "Agent: and I’ll DM you AI agent system prompt + full guide ↓
Anthropic engineer:
"You're not supposed to prompt Claude. You're supposed to build a system that prompts itself."
In 45 minutes she shows exactly how Anthropic builds agents that remember, fix their own mistakes and get smarter with every run.
This beats any paid course on agents I've seen.
Watch it, then read the guide on building loops below.