1/4 🧵Impressive analysis and great insights, @RonanFarrow. The remaining question is whether it is possible to find a CEO with enough personal integrity to manage this growing/ challenging technology.
(6/11) A legal review that was an integral part if Altman's return. The review, by the law firm WilmerHale, was overseen by two board members selected in close conversation with Altman. People close to the investigation told us that no written report was ever produced—though many executives expected one, given the high profile nature of the scandal. Only an 800 word announcement from OpenAI was released, acknowledging a "breakdown in trust."
Some of the lawyers involved defended their work as "an independent, careful, comprehensive review" and one of the new board members said there was "no need for a formal written report." Many others disagreed:
1
282
2/4 🧵That challenge could be addressed with a Constitution? @AnthropicAI CEO has said: “We believe that a feasible goal for 2026 is to
train Claude in such a way that it almost never goes against the spirit of its constitution”.
1
22
3/4 🧵 An AI Constitution, however, raises further questions. Can it address market failures arising from bounded rationality (failure) when economic agents selfishly prioritize personal benefits?
Which is to say, a constitution aimed at ensuring (CEO) personal integrity?
Apr 6, 2026 · 7:32 PM UTC
1
95
4/4 🧵In Colombia 🇨🇴, some debates have taken place about how to control TechCompanies powers.
Yet, this has proven difficult even to fully comprehend. One author describes part of the issue as the “profitability of chaos.”
@AnaBejaranoRG ha planteado debates sobre el poder acumulado por empresas tecnológicas, así como los límites que deben imponerse para evitar excesos. JGVásquez afirma algo similar, refiriéndose al fenómeno como “la rentabilidad del caos”.
1
145