AI models do not have a full range of creative abilities, they are very sophisticated token auto-completers. Demis Hassabis well-placed to assess:
What do humans have that AIs do not:
"DH: I would call it “true invention”. Humans have analogical reasoning — it’s like, oh, I’ve got all this knowledge, and then I found some underlying pattern in this other area that this could map to. Our AI systems are still not capable of that. But one day they might be. Lots of people are researching these things: can you codify curiosity? I think that kind of out-of-the-box invention requires a few extra skills beyond just pattern matching. It requires good judgment, good taste. That’s what separates good scientists from great scientists, and I’m pretty sure good artists from great artists. If you’re lucky in science, which I know a lot about, they always say, I can smell this idea is a good one. And we don’t have that yet in these AI systems."
And he corrects the 'creatives' framing in the piece