The thing about false flags is, it’s a desperate regime that resorts to it as a last-ditch effort to manipulate the public. When the regime does them too frequently, the public sees them coming a mile away.
Since the Lavon Affair in 1954 when Israel attempted to murder American and British civilians and blame it on Egypt (they were tried and convicted, and finally admitted it in 2005), Israel has specialized in false flags.
They carried out a false flag for 4 years (1979-83), Israeli government terrorists pretended to be the Front for the Liberation of Lebanon from Foreigners, planting car bombs to kill civilians.
Heck, they did it as far back as 1950, carrying out bombings in Baghdad AGAINST JEWS to blame their enemies and get those sweet victimhood points.
The hijacking of Air France Flight 139 on June 27, 1976 was blamed on two Palestinians. We found out in 2007 that those two Palestinians were working for Shin Bet, Israeli Secret Service.
And then there’s October 7 itself, which Netanyahu intentionally funded, even after being told the millions he was secretly funneling Hamas was being used to prepare the attack whose blueprints were in Israeli possession for a year. Netanyahu was warned by Egypt, the U.S., the UAE, and their own intel. It was the plan.
False flags are often blamed on enemies, and often, but not always, are stopped almost miraculously in the nick of time. Most of the time it involves a “patsy,” a low-IQ or brainwashed person being used to carry it out with the prompting and provision of the regime itself.
Remember the decade after 9/11 when we had the constant “FBI stops bomber in nick of time” headlines? Yeah. The small print showed those bombs were provided by the FBI and the culprits were all mouth-breathing retards. Promotions abounded to the “brave” agents and the government got to justify our new surveillance state.
Israel’s false flags are even more obvious.
There are usually bizarre and inexplicable deviations from protocol that allow the perpetrator to “slip through” preventative measures that are ordinarily followed without exception.
Like, “How did a foreign Arab pilot get a cockpit in an Israeli plane when they should already be banned under existing safety protocol?”
Or, “Why wasn’t that really close rooftop shooting perch unwatched, which almost never happens?”
Often, there are inexplicable, cascading failures that should have prevented it. The regime characterizes each as coincidence or just incompetence.
Most often, the regime will have the case wrapped up with a bow before local law enforcement even had a chance to investigate and in a suspiciously quick fashion. Kind of like Israel announcing the culprit was a radicalized Islamist with terrorism training before Saudi could even clear the plane. If Netanyahu knew this info before local officials could even determine what happened, then why did Israeli intel let him board the plane with a captain’s hat?
“Oh, look. The most sophisticated intel agency on Earth made another catastrophic oopsie.” Nothing to see here, Citizen.
And in most cases, the big tell is watching how the regime uses the event to enact goals unfulfillable any other way without the tragedy.
You know, like sympathy that allows the international community to ignore genocide for a while or TPUSA going pro-Whatever-Israel-Wants as soon as Charlie dies.
Who benefited the most from the hijacking? Who benefited the most from Charlie’s assassination?
It’s the same people in both cases.
Is THIS tragedy a false flag? The question is, “Does this benefit or hurt Israel?”
Every single thing about Israel’s longterm behavior demonstrates the likelihood that if a tragedy benefits the Israeli regime, it’s almost certainly the Israeli regime who manufactured it.
If you say, “Israel would never do something like this,” they already have. And they’ve done it repeatedly for decades.