𝙊𝙣𝙚 𝙊𝙛 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘽𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙒𝙚𝙗3 𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙨 𝙏𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜. Projects often attract lots of participants, but not everyone can effectively amplify a campaign. @gib_work's latest feature addresses this. 🧵

Everyone talk more about what @Primus_Labs is building but almost forgot the people backing them. Primus raised $6.5M in its pre seed and seed rounds, with Dispersion Capital, Symbolic Capital and VanEck leading the round announced in February 2025. The investor list is worth looking at: • VanEck — a name from traditional asset management. • Symbolic Capital — focused on backing blockchain and Web3 startups. • Dispersion Capital — invests in early stage Web3 infrastructure. • Samsung Next and Alchemy — additional backing from the technology and blockchain infrastructure side. • Maelstrom, SNZ Holding, Hash Global, Amber Group and others — further support from across the crypto investment landscape. But here’s why I think this matters beyond the names on the cap table. Primus is tackling a real problem with institutional adoption of public blockchains. Institutions want the benefits of onchain finance, but they can’t always afford to expose their positions, financial data and strategies to the entire market. Primus is working on infrastructure that lets sensitive data remain private while still allowing important information to be verified. That’s where technologies like zkTLS and fully homomorphic encryption come into the picture. The goal isn’t to make financial activity impossible to verify. It’s to make verification possible without exposing everything behind it. The backers bring credibility and resources, but the real test will be whether Primus can turn this technology into infrastructure institutions actually use. Strong investors get attention but real adoption is what makes the thesis work

Gm guys Another day to show up again.

Kaito go first use one cook deceive everybody Before you know GBA go just full everywhere

have you ever wondered how bizarre markets like this ever resolved? and what could happen if Jesus actually comes back one day, let's take a little dip into resolution of prediction markets :) we have 5 people involved ⤷ creator ⤷ trader ⤷ asserter/proposer ⤷ disputer ⤷ voters but we will be focusing on the asserter and proposer for now the proposer is the one who submits the final outcome to the oracle once the market ends. they put up a bond (let's say 1000usdc), and if they're wrong they lose it. the disputer is anyone who thinks that answer is wrong. They put up their own bond to challenge it. if the asserter is wrong, they lose their bond, same goes with the disputer :) now the first dispute triggers a new proposal round and if not resolved it goes to the UMA voting system. ⤺ the voters are UMA token holders. If the answer is disputed twice, they stake their tokens and vote on what the correct outcome is. will explain how fairly this "voting" works tomorrow 👀 so when a market like this closes, someone proposes the result, and if it's "No" and nobody can argue otherwise, it settles quickly. @Polymarket normally has a 2 hour challenge window also another quick note, the market's written rules decide everything, which is why traders read the resolution criteria before they buy money keeps everyone honest. That's how prediction markets settle even the strangest questions.

Motion graphics slop incoming Ona wan pollute TL for us That shi go loose it's relevance asap.

I was scrolling through a crypto forum yesterday evening when someone posted: “𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗺𝘆 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻.” It seemed ordinary until I remembered being in that same position a few months ago. That strange mix of relief and regret. Relief because I could finally use my money. Regret because getting there meant navigating exchanges, conversions, and all the complications of turning crypto into money I could actually spend. And it got me thinking... "𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱?" That’s the real problem with crypto. Not just volatility. Not just regulation. It’s the gap between owning digital assets and actually using them. Paynexis wants to 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗴𝗮𝗽. Here’s how; (𝗮 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 🧵: )

Gm guys

Y'all really sure this is uptober..? Mehn my port has been at all time low this month

this just hit different. 
we didn’t just fail the tech but we failed the vision tokenization isn’t the next narrative, it’s the only narrative that actually matters. FT: @totofinance x @montymetzger

Stacks DeFi is getting more interesting. 👀 @tenero_io just launched V2, bringing swaps, yield, token discovery, and wallet tracking into one place. I explored the platform, and here's what caught my attention. 🧵

In Crypto, Everyone Has a Prediction. Few Have a Track Record You Can Follow. Every market cycle brings people calling the next breakout, naming the tokens they believe will outperform, or explaining why a particular narrative is about to take off. Sometimes they’re right. Sometimes they’re wrong. And sometimes, by the time you realise what happened, the original prediction is buried several weeks down your timeline. But here’s the thing: making a prediction is easy. Building a track record people can actually evaluate is much harder. Anyone can make a bold call when the market is moving. The more interesting question is what happens after that call, and whether you can look back at someone’s predictions to understand how they’ve performed over time. Confidence isn’t the same as credibility A convincing argument doesn’t automatically make a prediction accurate. Someone can sound certain about a token’s next move and still get it wrong. Another person might explain their reasoning carefully, acknowledge the risks, and reach a different conclusion. That’s why judging someone’s market opinions from a single post can be misleading. A clearer picture comes from seeing their predictions over time, understanding the reasoning behind them, and being able to revisit those calls after the outcomes are known. Even then, a track record isn’t a guarantee of future success. Market conditions change, and a few correct predictions don’t necessarily prove that someone has a reliable strategy. But having that history available gives people more context than confidence alone ever could. Where @tryimoo fits in This is one reason I’m interested in what IMO is building. IMO is an early-stage, mobile-first social network for prediction markets on Solana. Part of its planned experience centres on trader profiles and prediction histories, alongside a social feed and market discussions. The idea is to connect people with the predictions they make, rather than leaving those predictions scattered across a fast-moving social timeline. Imagine being able to explore a trader’s previous calls, revisit the reasoning behind them, and follow the discussions around the markets they’re interested in. That could make it easier to evaluate someone’s opinions in context instead of judging them by their latest post. The important distinction is that IMO is building towards this experience. Its planned features still need to prove their usefulness as the product develops. What I’d be watching For me, the interesting part isn’t simply whether a platform lets people post predictions. It’s whether it makes those predictions easier to revisit and evaluate. Can users understand what someone predicted and why? Can they look back after an event has resolved? Can they distinguish a consistent record from a few lucky calls? Those are the kinds of details that could determine whether prediction histories become genuinely useful or just another profile feature. IMO’s approach creates room to explore that possibility by bringing trader profiles, prediction histories and market conversations into one experience. How well it delivers on that idea is what I’ll be watching as development progresses. My takeaway Crypto doesn’t have a shortage of people telling us what they think will happen next. What it often lacks is an easy way to put those predictions into context over time. IMO is exploring how social prediction markets could make that history more accessible, connecting predictions with the people behind them. Its first launch is planned for Solana Mobile, with iOS intended to follow, so the product still has to demonstrate how useful this approach can be in practice. But the question is worth asking: When someone makes a bold prediction in crypto, do you judge the call itself, or do you look at their track record first? Follow @tryimoo or visit tryimo.xyz to follow what the team is building.

CT people know this pain 😭 Imagine waiting 20 minutes for a P2P merchant to release your own naira Like why are we still doing this Spenda 2.0 @MySpenda makes it easier to move between crypto and naira in seconds without waiting for a merchant or dealing with all that payment stress You also get a USD card for subscriptions, bill payments and a smooth app experience Watch the video and see what Spenda 2.0 is bringing to the table 👇🏾 #MySpenda

Most VIP systems only care about how much money you park or trade. MEXC VVIP starts differently. New users get an initial M-Score of 350 after one full day from registration. That puts you straight into Standard with no minimum balance and no trading volume requirement. The new Score Insights view breaks that score into five dimensions: •Trading Performance • Asset Level • Security Verification • Platform Activity • Account Tenure You can finally see which areas are already solid and which ones still have room. One Standard benefit that actually matters for regular users is Futures Loss Coverage. At Standard (M-Score 350–599) the trigger probability is 1%, with daily and event limits plus a max coverage amount per claim (Futures Bonus). It’s not guaranteed protection it’s a small, tiered safety net that improves as your M-Score rises into Premier and Elite. You can enter first, look at your current dimensions, and decide later whether higher tiers are worth pursuing for your style of trading or holding. Check your M-Score and Score Insights here: mexc.com/user/m-score

𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 Understanding your assets, tracking wallet activity, and finding opportunities are all part of the DeFi experience Tenero V2 is bringing more of that experience together for the Stacks ecosystem 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀🧵

Some days ago i began the journey of bringing an idea to life and here I am giving a snippet of what i have accomplished so far. This is 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗣𝗮𝘆 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 A Real-world merchant payment on @Circle's @arc mainnet powered purely by USDC Built with Arc Studio Coming soon‼️

so vitalik triggered a discussion on whether blockchains like ethereum should rely on hash-based or lattice-based cryptography to protect users against future quantum computers the discussion started after vitalik buterin argued that ethereum should favour hash-based signatures because he believes they offer a more conservative approach to long-term security his concern is that ai could accelerate mathematical research and help researchers discover new ways to break cryptographic systems that rely on complex mathematical structures but not everyone agrees with him, with critics arguing that lattice-based cryptography has been extensively studied, offers strong security foundations, and is more practical for many real-world applications to understand the debate, we need to understand what post-quantum cryptography means in simple terms, it refers to cryptographic systems designed to remain secure even when powerful quantum computers become available many of the systems protecting our digital lives today rely on mathematical problems that quantum computers could eventually solve, which is why researchers are developing alternatives two of the main alternatives are hash-based and lattice-based cryptography hash-based cryptography relies on mathematical functions that turn information into fixed-length outputs, making it difficult to reverse the process or find specific inputs that produce the same result its biggest advantage is simplicity in its security assumptions, as it relies primarily on the strength of cryptographic hash functions however, hash-based signatures can be much larger and less efficient than some alternatives lattice-based cryptography relies on a different kind of mathematical problem involving complex structures in many dimensions these problems are believed to be difficult to solve efficiently, even with quantum computers, and researchers have spent years studying their security lattice-based systems generally offer smaller signatures, better performance in many applications, and additional capabilities such as post-quantum encryption this is where the disagreement begins vitalik's position is that when it comes to protecting billions of dollars in a blockchain ecosystem, it may be wiser to rely on the cryptographic approach with fewer mathematical assumptions he believes that ai could help researchers uncover weaknesses in lattice-based systems that humans have not yet discovered, potentially changing what we consider secure today his argument is not that lattice-based cryptography has already been broken, but that its underlying mathematical structure could create risks that become more more as research advances critics argue that this concern does not automatically make lattice-based cryptography less secure they point out that researchers have already spent decades analysing these systems and developing methods to test their resistance to attacks they also argue that hash-based cryptography is not perfect, since its security still depends on the strength of the underlying hash functions another important point is practicality hash-based signatures can be significantly larger, which matters for blockchains where transaction size affects network efficiency and transaction costs lattice-based systems are often more efficient and can support applications that hash-based signatures cannot easily replace, including certain forms of post-quantum encryption in other words, choosing hash-based cryptography may offer a more conservative approach to digital signatures, but it can also come with performance and functionality trade-offs choosing lattice-based cryptography offers greater efficiency and broader capabilities, but it means relying on mathematical problems that future research could potentially weaken the real question is whether the possibility of future breakthroughs is enough reason to favour one approach over the other cont'd

If you are a video content creator. here is a chance to earn from your content. Bitget Wallet is hosting a $600 contest with 18 winners. 🥇 1st: $150 🥈 2nd: $100 🥉 3rd: $50 🏅 4th–18th: $20 each Your task is to make a 40–60 second video showing how to cash out crypto directly to your Nigerian bank account using Bitget Wallet. Deadline: October 31. Entry link in the comments.