Research Scientist at @InSilicoMeds Opinions are my own

Montréal, Québec
🧬LLMs are getting better at chemistry. But can they design molecular binders in 3D? At @InSilicoMeds we test whether LLMs can generate ligands directly in a protein pocket while following spatial constraints such as fixed fragments, pharmacophores and required interactions. 🧵
1
6
20
6,643
Accepted to the #EMNLP2026 Industry Track 🎉 @InSilicoMeds built MMAI Gym for Science. @liquidai built the Liquid Foundation Model. We combined them. 400+ drug-discovery tasks. Chemistry-native tokens. SFT, then RL. Not a bigger model. A better gym. 🏋️ #insilicoSOTAFM 🧵👇
5
5
25
7,371
5/6 The same model can also write 3D molecular structures as text 🧬 Nothing has to condition it: asked for a molecule and nothing else, the model writes the graph and every atom’s coordinates. Given a protein pocket, it does the same thing on demand - the ligand’s SMILES graph first, then coordinates one atom at a time. No diffusion module. We measure this on #Bench3DFit, our own benchmark for pocket-conditioned generation: both LFM2-MMAI variants achieve the strongest UniDock binding affinity of any language model we tested - beating several specialist diffusion baselines and approaching the strongest models overall. The contrast is striking: GPT-5.5 generates molecules that are almost perfectly valid and geometrically tidy - but bind poorly. Our models do the opposite. MMAI Gym pushes the LM toward the objective that matters for structure-based drug design, rather than rewarding it for simply playing safe 🎯
1
6
138
The takeaway 💡 With the right data, rewards, and training recipe, a 2.6B model can handle drug-discovery tasks that frontier-scale general-purpose LLMs still miss - at a fraction of the inference cost. The generalizable part is the gym, not the parameter count 🏋️ MMAI Gym for Science is designed to work with the causal LM you already have. Joint work between @InSilicoMeds and @liquidai 🤝 With @zulfatmif, @RimShayakhmetov, @sumrexromanus, @ThomasMM17, @mathieu_reymond, @mihirbafna14, @kaelikl, @eugenebabin, @ramin_m_h, @xanamini, @VladAladin, @AlexAliper and @biogerontology. 📄 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2603.03517v2 🤗 Discuss on Hugging Face: huggingface.co/papers/2603.0… 🏋️ MMAI Gym for Science: insilico.com/mmai 🔑 Request model access: liquid.ai/request-access-mma… 📊 Explore MMAI specialists on #DDDBench: dddbench.insilico.com
1
1
10
271
LFM2-2.6B proved remarkably efficient for its size, providing a strong foundation for training a SOTA-level specialist on our tasks. Small model, serious chemistry.
It was a pleasure to work with #LFM by @liquidai @ramin_m_h to train our new #insilicoSOTAFM model for single-step retrosynthesis 🧪on ~46M reactions! It provides plenty of diverse reactions that only partially intersect with the reaction space by previous SOTA small models! 🔎👀
1
11
673
LFM2 is an impressive LLM - great work, @liquidai, @ramin_m_h, and @xanamini! From my own experience, LFM2.5 is even more impressive and performs better on chemistry tasks.
4
109
🪶 What can a 2.6B-parameter language model achieve in retrosynthesis? With a leak-proof, broad-coverage drug discovery benchmark #DDDBench, it becomes easier to evolve general-purpose models into SOTA-level specialists. #insilicoSOTAFM
🚀 5 new drug-discovery specialist LLMs. SOTA-level performance across 70+ benchmark tasks. Insilico Medicine has released a series of frontier Specialist Language Models for chemistry and biology, trained through MMAI Gym. They cover drug safety, potency prediction, chemical synthesis, and biology. 🧬 From general-purpose models to scientific specialists.
3
14
582
We’ve updated the #DDDBench with our own models, including LFM2-MMAI-Chem-SSRS-2.0, our single-step retrosynthesis specialist and the current SOTA on #ChemCensor.
1
2
8
316
Without access to the specialized tools, computational models, and web search used in @AnthropicAI protein binders design case study, Opus 5.0 also generates non-binding molecules in many cases, placing them outside the binding pocket, failing to fill it adequately, or missing the key interactions required for binding. There is still a long way to go before it can compete with specialized approaches such as diffusion models.
Promising results, but what about the most common drugs, small molecules? #Bench3DFit from @InSilicoMeds challenges models to generate 3D molecule binders for proteins. Opus-5 makes mistakes like clashes, small ligands and under-filling the pocket, but it’s come a long way!
1
31
3,628
I’m excited to share the follow-up paper to our #ChemCensor framework for evaluating single-step retrosynthesis 🧪 Our C3LM model was already competitive with, and in some cases superior to, general-purpose foundation models, but a gap remained between LLMs and conventional retrosynthesis models. We finally closed and surpassed that gap 🚀 The key ingredients were… 👇
3
4
15
1,366
3/n Together, these two ingredients enable C3LM to compete with and surpass strong conventional, non-LLM retrosynthesis models on the challenging URSA-expert-2026 test set 🏆 Our analysis shows that C3LM and conventional retrosynthesis models explore complementary reaction spaces 🧩 Each approach generates plausible reactions that the other may miss, suggesting that hybrid ensembles could provide broader chemical coverage and more robust synthesis planning than either model family alone 🤝
1
2
138
Huge progress from @AnthropicAI and a fascinating case study with @adaptyvbio. Protein binders are a reasonable testbed for AI in drug discovery: compared with many other modalities, they’re relatively fast and inexpensive to synthesize, screen, and validate experimentally. This is an important milestone, but not the finish line. Our own benchmarks show that Opus is steadily improving on drug-discovery tasks, yet it still struggles to generate physically plausible small-molecule ligands, especially relative to specialized diffusion models. There remains a long road from designing protein binders to developing safe and effective drugs.
Many drugs work by binding to a specific target in the body and blocking or changing what it does. An important first step in the drug development process is designing a molecule that can bind tightly to its target. Traditionally, that's meant weeks or months of expert work per target, sifting through a large number of candidates to identify the few that work. We wanted to test if Claude could successfully design novel protein binders from scratch (also called de novo design). With a protein design prompt written by a human expert, Claude autonomously designed protein binders against 14 out of 15 targets. We then worked with Adaptyv Bio and Twist Bioscience, who independently built and tested the proteins Claude designed.
3
2
15
2,105
See how Opus has evolved on #Bench3DFit
🚀 Opus 5.0 marks a breakthrough for frontier model-generated 3D ligands. After performance stalled and even regressed from Opus 4.6 to 4.8, Opus 5.0 delivers a dramatic leap on the 3D-Fit benchmark's PLINDER test set: 🧪 Far more poses pass PoseBusters checks ⚡️ UniDock scores move into much more optimized space 🎯 Stronger alignment with the physical principles of chemistry This is not just an incremental update. Opus 5.0 appears to make a real advance in generating plausible ligand poses. Impressive progress from @AnthropicAI! 🤯 👇 Explore #Bench3DFit at #DDDBench by @InSilicoMeds
2
5
743