Who knew?

We've seen what Russell Brand did. Now let's see what his lawyers did to stop us finding out.

Everyone says Russell Brand silenced his victims for years with legal threats. Let's see those threats. Lawyers will keep silencing victims and journalists in the shadows until we expose what they're doing.

This is an incredible watch. Not just the smile but also the eyes. Even Watters can’t believe it.

Wow. The comments. Brutal and well deserved.

If you can't back El-Sayed, you're just not paying attention. His take on Stephen Miller, and his appointment to Chief of Staff is the best and most precise read on what's going on. This is 100% right on EVERY POINT. El-Sayed gets it, and is able to communicate this properly. This is 🔥🔥🔥

Imagine putting together an entire halftime show based off of one woman doing a cover of Thunderstruck on xylophone……and having it KICK TOTAL ASS!

Poundland's private equity owners extracted £18.3m in 17 months, bought for £1. £8.6m interest, £3.8m store closure fees, £2.6m debt arrangement plus other fees. PE has £22.5m secured loan, will get paid first. HMRC owed £97m. Trade creditors owed £127m. news.sky.com/story/revealed-…

It’s either we’re all stupid and don’t know the rules or this is not a penalty. Never seen a clash of heads given as a penalty!!

Not all over for utd this. Get a point here and they are only 19 points behind arsenal.

Não sei como é que os racistas identitários portugueses conseguem subsistir...😸

The word “deficit”, when referring to government finances, is descriptively correct in accounting terms but rhetorically misleading, because in ordinary English it carries the sense of a shortage, inadequacy or failure. In this context, however, it simply describes a difference between government expenditure and receipts over an accounting period. It does not mean that the government itself is “short” of money. Compare: “The government ran a £100bn deficit.” with: “The government added £100bn of net sterling financial assets to the non-government sector.” They describe the same accounting outcome, yet provoke completely different intuitions. This is not to say that all government deficits produce good economic outcomes. A deficit may contribute to inflation; the composition of spending may be wasteful; or fiscal policy may produce an undesirable distribution of resources. Equally, a deficit may accompany price stability; the composition of spending may promote efficiency and productive capacity; or fiscal policy may produce a desirable distribution of resources. None of these outcomes necessarily follows from the fact that the government’s accounting balance carries a minus sign. It depends on the economic circumstances, the level and composition of spending and taxation, and the productive limits of the economy. A government “deficit”, then, identifies a residual accounting balance, not a deficiency in the government’s finances. The mistake is to import the ordinary-language meaning of deficiency into a national-accounting identity.

Can't argue with facts..

Have a listen because this is unerringly correct. The only quibble I have is that it's not like a cult, it IS a cult, an unreal mythology imposed on the management of Western economies by Anglicised Protestantism. It deified the saver/investor and profaned the worker/debtor.

Zionist Politician Susan Hall gets dogwalked by Zack Polanski leader of the Green Party on Antisemitism & Zionism

RT @Kaiz_294: James Talarico traces 50 years of trickle-down back to one 1971 document, the Powell memo, a corporate blueprint to buy power…

Privatisation of British Library: To be asset stripped, destroyed like water companies & Royal Mail: BL management will close reading rooms, converting them into paid, private spaces operated by commercial company. They propose outsourcing in-house security. Stop this rip-off.

What iPads did to Norwegian children!

Running orders for later 👇👇👇

Private equity is really doing this btw Not with boscovs and blockbuster tho, I just used two random dead companies