1) Romans 3:23 does not mean literally every individual human being without exception has personally committed sin.
If it did, you just made Jesus a sinner.
Obviously you recognize an exception because Scripture gives you reason to recognize one.
There are others. Infants have not committed personal sins. Paul explicitly speaks of Jacob and Esau before they "had done nothing either good or bad." - Romans 9:11
So "all have sinned" is a statement about the universal human predicament Paul is describing, not a mathematical proposition forbidding every possible exception.
The question therefore isn't, "Does Romans 3:23 contain the word all?"
The question is whether Scripture gives us reason to recognize Mary as an exceptional recipient of God's grace.
2) And you've overstated the Greek argument.
Luke calls Mary:
κεχαριτωμένη - kecharitomene
That's the perfect passive participle of charitoo, and Gabriel actually uses it in addressing her:
"Rejoice, kecharitomene, the Lord is with you." - Luke 1:28
The perfect tense points to an action already accomplished whose effects continue in the present.
Ephesians 1:6 does indeed use the SAME ROOT VERB, charitoo.
But Paul does NOT call every Christian "kecharitomene."
He uses ἐχαρίτωσεν - echaritosen - an aorist active indicative verb describing what God has done for us in Christ.
Same lexical root does not mean identical grammatical construction or identical statement.
And no informed Catholic argument should be:
"Kecharitomene exists, therefore Immaculate Conception. QED."
It's one piece of a cumulative biblical case.
3) Mary calling God her Savior is not remotely a problem for the Immaculate Conception.
Catholics believe Mary was SAVED BY CHRIST.
The doctrine doesn't say Mary didn't need a Savior.
It says Christ saved her in an extraordinary way, by preserving her from original sin through the merits of Christ.
If I'm falling into a pit and you pull me out, you saved me.
If you stop me from falling into the pit in the first place, YOU STILL SAVED ME.
In fact, you saved me more perfectly.
The Immaculate Conception is not salvation apart from Christ.
It is salvation BY Christ applied preventively.
4) Scripture explicitly says God is capable of preserving a human being from falling into sin:
"Now to him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you without blemish before the presence of his glory..." - Jude 24
So there's no theological problem with God giving someone sufficient grace to preserve that person from sin.
Mary isn't sinless because she's divine.
She's sinless by GRACE.
That's rather the point.
5) And then there's the larger biblical typology you're ignoring.
Genesis 3:15 establishes ENMITY between:
THE WOMAN and THE SERPENT
and between:
HER SEED and HIS SEED.
Then Revelation 12 gives us:
THE WOMAN
THE MESSIANIC CHILD
THE ANCIENT SERPENT
THE SERPENT WAGING WAR AGAINST HER OFFSPRING.
And John rather conspicuously has Jesus call His own mother "WOMAN" both at Cana and from the Cross. - John 2:4, 19:26
Mary is the New Eve precisely because Christ is the New Adam.
Eve encounters the serpent, disobeys, and participates in Adam's fall.
Mary encounters God's messenger, answers:
"Let it be to me according to your word."
And through her comes the New Adam who defeats the serpent.
That's why the extraordinary grace of Luke 1:28 matters within the larger biblical picture.
So no, the Catholic case isn't:
"Here's one Greek participle. Dogma established."
It's cumulative:
Romans 3:23 allows exceptions rather than logically excluding them.
Luke uniquely addresses Mary as kecharitomene.
Mary absolutely needs and receives salvation from Christ.
Jude explicitly says God can preserve someone from falling and present that person without blemish.
Genesis introduces the Woman and her Seed in complete enmity with the serpent.
John repeatedly calls Jesus' mother "Woman."
Revelation returns to the Woman, her messianic Child, and "that ancient serpent."
And the early Church recognized the Mary/Eve parallel extraordinarily early.
You can argue that this cumulative case doesn't establish the Immaculate Conception.
That's a legitimate argument.
But "Romans says all and Ephesians uses the same verb" doesn't make the Catholic case disappear.
x.com/i/status/1998015900234…
🔥 NEW SONG: The Immaculate Conception: Fitting Not Forced
Feast of the Immaculate Conception
Peter’s Barque
Two ways to save someone from a pit.
That’s it.
That’s the whole doctrine people tie themselves in knots avoiding.
You can save someone after they fall —
that’s us.
Every sinner Christ drags back to life with grace.
Or you can save someone by preventing the fall entirely —
that’s what He does for His mother.
Same Savior. Same grace. Different application. Perfect symmetry.
The New Eve doesn’t start broken.
The New Ark doesn’t carry the Word with spiritual rot.
Genesis 3:15 says “enmity,” which means total separation, not “Satan gets partial custody.”
Revelation 12 calls her the mother of all who keep God’s commandments.
Gabriel greets her not with a name, but with a title meaning “graced completely.”
And none of this dents monotheism —
the people who died defending the One God didn’t suddenly forget theology in the first century.
This track hits.
The visuals hit harder.
And the next ones are coming fast.
Peter’s Barque is picking up speed.
🔗 LISTEN & FOLLOW
Spotify:
open.spotify.com/artist/07uv…
Apple Music:
music.apple.com/us/artist/pe…
IG:
instagram.com/petersbarque
X:
x.com/petersbarque
FB:
facebook.com/petersbarque
TikTok:
tiktok.com/@petersbarque