'Elisabeth Bik is a Dutch microbiologist. [...] Then she opened a PhD thesis that had lifted text from somewhere else, and her eye caught something different. A duplicated image. She sat down and went through 20,621 published biomedical papers. By eye.' facebook.com/WeirdbutTruex/p…
8
47
448
56,054
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
A 7 hour sexual assault The young girl left school Traumatized These 4 grown ass men felt the punishment for the BOYS should be “writing a fucking essay”
1,380
25,415
63,443
841,643
"Cornell has failed to address the growing issue of sexual assault on campus with its pathetic task force. Cornell has failed the student allegedly raped by those 7 men at Chi Phi in October 2024. Cornell has failed her. Cornell has failed us" @cornellsun cornellsun.com/article/2026/…
5
48
144
5,490
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Made a Grok @bot with the prompt so you can easily generate an Apple-style ad for your own pet. I tested it with my labradoodle, Tilly - you just need a few photos and a couple of their hobbies or personality traits. Link to use it yourself 👇
Marketing my cat like a new Apple product
11
11
150
22,602
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Marketing my cat like a new Apple product
263
7,059
61,730
1,214,656
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
SCOOP: Top researchers at Columbia, Stanford, and others thought they were elected to elite scientific societies alongside Nobel laureates. The catch? The organizations are a sham. I spent the last month investigating a massive academic scam, for @Nature nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
11
176
473
137,753
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
This was a difficult story to report. Some of these conversations stayed with me long after the interviews ended. I spoke with these bright, ambitious women who came to Silicon Valley to pursue their dreams. They described being sexually harassed, assaulted or raped—often by someone they knew and trusted, someone they considered a friend. What was especially painful to hear was what happened afterward. Some described being discouraged from going to the police. Others said they were told nobody would believe them. And someone was told that she was seeking attention and all was a lie. 🥲 Alongside the trauma came fears about losing friendships, careers and their place in a community they had hoped to belong to. When the person you’re accusing has money, influence and powerful connections, seeking accountability can feel like David taking on Goliath. Victims aren’t always women, although most of the accounts shared with me came from women. One woman’s point stayed with me: we need to confront the predatory mindset—the entitlement that allows someone to disregard another person’s boundaries. Whisper networks can help people warn and protect one another. But they cannot substitute for a system people can trust: somewhere to turn for support, a fair process for investigating allegations, and meaningful accountability when misconduct is established—even when those responsible are wealthy or powerful. To the women who shared their experiences with me: thank you. I know these are deeply personal and painful things to revisit. I appreciate your trust. No single article can capture the full weight or complexity of someone’s experience. I take seriously the responsibility of telling these stories with care. My hope is that bringing them into the light helps more people find support—and helps create a culture where pursuing your dreams doesn’t mean staying silent about harm. If you ever unfortunately get into the situation of experiencing rape or sexual assault, please seek medical care and professional support, and consider reporting to the police when you feel safe and ready. You do not have to face this alone. What happened was not your fault, and you deserve care, support and to be heard. I was deeply moved by the strength of the women I spoke with and their determination not to let what happened define their lives. They still have dreams to pursue, companies to build and so much ahead of them. They deserve every opportunity to shape that future. 🌷 Read my latest article for @nypost and @californiapost (link in thread) 👇
106
971
3,775
882,710
Is AI Flooding Medical Journals With 'Meaningless' Research? With some quotes by me: "We are at a point now that we cannot distinguish fake from real," said Elisabeth Bik by @rachrobertson__ for @medpagetoday medpagetoday.com/special-rep…
7
17
60
4,692
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Credit: GPT6-Astra Inspired by @christlet 🦋 bsky.app/profile/christlet.b…
5
8
99
7,774
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Unfortunately, it turns out that this is AI "enhanced." Nikon updated their article to clarify that the colors and organelles are all generated by AI "post-processing" of "grayscale" data. Very unclear what the raw data actually was. nikonsmallworld.com/masters-…
🥇 Congratulations to Dr. Ning Xu for winning this year's Nikon Small World in Motion competition! Read more about Dr. Ning Xu and his winning video in his Masters of Microscopy article: bit.ly/4cPi9Mp
8
21
114
25,314
Stanford confirmed that Residential and Dining Enterprises (R&DE) used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students in a promotional image. “Stanford wants to put on this image that, ‘yes, we are diverse.’ @Stanford @StanfordDaily stanforddaily.com/2026/09/23…
10
9
62
11,272
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
JUST IN: Stanford University is accused of using AI to change students’ race & gender while making others appear thinner in advertising, with one student saying he felt “silenced & erased.”
516
1,514
35,060
15,916,821
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Can YOU see it? This is why you shouldn't trust generative AI, in one photo. Watch, share, and tell your friends how far into the video you were when you saw it!
304
1,561
6,938
276,397
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Replying to @ilands_ai
Please stop spamming me with useless AI bots asking for money to analyze what humans already did.
1
1
24
4,799
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Deepfakes are everywhere, but digital forensics investigators are fighting back. Learn more: scim.ag/4cOYJXT @NewsfromScience
70
1,161
11,777
4,303,485
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
Retraction. It took more than 4 years from when I emailed the journal (@SageJournals) about these serious concerns. Frankly, that's totally ridiculous. h/t anon Hoya and thanks to @MicrobiomDigest for exposing additional problems,🍺♥️, respectively. pubpeer.com/publications/DC1…
5
22
1,975
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
at ucsf
14
136
1,272
40,901
Elisabeth Bik retweeted
‘I don’t know how they’ll rebuild trust. I hope there will be some lawsuit, I’m not a fan of suing people in general but this is a big scandal,’ says Elisabeth Bik. @MicrobiomDigest @addictedtoigno1 chemistryworld.com/news/anti…
1
12
29
8,823
Looking forward to speaking tonight with @AaronPanofsky at the joint BeSHG/NVHG (the Dutch and Belgian Societies for Human Genetics) meeting at De Doelen in Rotterdam. nvhg.nl/general-information-…
1
14
3,117
A nice walk around the Reeuwijkse Plassen. Good to be back in the Netherlands!
2
50
5,535
A recent LinkedIn post by Vincenzo Raimo asked an interesting question: what if universities gave students an itemised breakdown showing what their tuition fees actually pay for? It made me wonder: Why don't academic publishers do the same with APCs? Imagine paying a $2,500 APC and receiving something like this: ⚫️ Submission and manuscript handling: $180 ⚫️ Editorial management: $260 ⚫️ Peer review administration: $220 ⚫️ Research integrity checks: $120 ⚫️ Copy-editing and production: $300 ⚫️ Publishing platform and technology: $240 ⚫️ DOI, indexing, metadata and archiving: $80 ⚫️ Author support, billing and administration: $150 ⚫️ Cost of rejected manuscripts: $350 ⚫️ Publisher margin/surplus: $600 ⚫️ Peer reviewer remuneration: $0 ⚫️ Academic editor remuneration: $0 Total: $2,500 The numbers are illustrative, of course. But the principle is the interesting part. If publishers can justify an APC of $2,500, why not show authors, universities and funders exactly what they are paying for? Would greater transparency make you more comfortable paying an APC, or would it raise even more questions? Original post that prompted the idea: buff.ly/i6ZV3uu
5
15
2,063