Intel’s EMIB-T is scaling. It is not replacing CoWoS.
5 → 20 → 45 kwpm by 2028e.
Still ~12% of the 2.5D stack. TSMC remains the base layer.
Morgan Stanley · $INTC
Data versionMorgan Stanley still has EMIB-T as the primary TPU packaging flow. TSMC CoWoS is overflow, not a takeover.
Intel mix: EMIB-T 5 / 20 / 45 kwpm. EMIB-M stays ~95. 2.5D stack: 142 → 250 → 374 kwpm. Intel sliver = 10–15%. Could support ~2.5M TPU units by 2028
Micron capex is not a cycle spike. It is a construction calendar.
FY25 actual: $13.8B
FY26 outlook: ~$27B
FY27: >$45B - 3.3× in two years
New wafers still arrive late: Jan 2026 - NY ground break
Mid-2027 - ID1 Boise + Tongluo
Late 2028 - ID2 Idaho
That is why management says industry supply only improves gradually in 2028. Demand is doubling. The fabs that could close the gap cannot show up sooner.
$MU reports Wednesday.
US data-center IT power demand is exploding.
Morgan Stanley: 9.19 GW in 2025 → 78.57 GW by 2029.
That’s 8.5x in four years.
2026: 17.96 GW
2027: 35.46 GW
2028: 52.31 GW
Not just more buildings. Denser racks. Vera Rubin ~234 kW. Rubin Ultra ~600 kW.
Chips getting more efficient. Total electricity still climbing.
The bottleneck is no longer only GPUs. It’s power.
Source: Morgan Stanley, Sept. 2026
$NBIS$IREN$CIFR$WULF
SK hynix at TSMC OIP 2026:
HBM3E / Rubin HBM4 → 12-hi × 3GB = 36GB HBM4 → 16-hi × 3GB = 48GB HBM4E → 12-hi × 4GB = 48GB
The jump is per die, not stack height. 4GB vs 3GB is how 12 layers match a 16-high part.
Nvidia Rubin: 288GB HBM4 (8×36GB). Swap those sites for HBM4E already on the booth → 384GB.
HBM5 is validated on the CoWoS package it will ride. Memory per GPU keeps climbing through the next two cycles.
$SKHY
Component lead times are no longer about GPUs.
GPU: 35w = “balanced”
DRAM 8 → 20
NAND 8 → 16
HDD 16 → 50
ABF 12 → 52
MLCC 12 → 32
The queue has moved to memory, storage, substrates, and caps.
$MU$SNDK$WDC$STX$NVDA$AMD
Samsung vs SK Hynix in HBM gets tight by 2027.
JPM sales share:
2025 → SKH 60% / SEC 20% / MU 20%
2027E → SKH 41% / SEC 39% / MU 21%
Micron holds ~1/5. The fight is Korea vs Korea.
$DRAM$MU$EWY
Bernstein: Data center power demand ~19% CAGR → 1,570 TWh by 2032E. AI servers are the load.
400 TWh (2024) → 1,570 TWh (2032E)
$NVDA$DELL$GEV$IREN$CRWV$NBIS
The GPU is the only balanced line on the rack.
ABF 4.3×
HDD 3.1×
MLCC 2.7×
DRAM 2.5×
NAND 2.0×
CPU 1.5×
GPU 1.0×
Agentic AI adds CPU hours, storage and substrates first. Discrete GPUs are not the scarce SKU this week.
$MU operating margins by unit, last five quarters.
Cloud Memory - the unit that sells HBM - started as the high-margin business at 46%. By May 2026 it was second-lowest at 78%.
Same year: Mobile & Client 15% → 86% (+71 pts) Cloud / HBM 46% → 78% (+32 pts)
DRAM’s No.1 and No.2 races in one chart.
Samsung flipped SK hynix twice in 2025 and now leads by 14.5 points.
Meanwhile SK hynix’s lead over Micron collapsed from 16.7 → 1.6 points.
$SKHY$MU
Blended HBM pricing forecast (Jefferies/Fubon):
📈 Rises 45% from $18 (2Q26) → peaks at $26.1/GB in 2Q27 📉 Then enters a shallow correction (not a sharp crash)
Still ~38% above 2Q26 base even by 2Q28.
$MU$NVDA$SKHynix$DRAM
The "GPUs are the only tollbooth" narrative is dying.
Merchant GPU shipments: 6.8M → 13.9M by 2028
Custom ASIC/XPU: 1.5M → 17.0M by 2028
By 2028, custom silicon overtakes GPUs in raw volume. Hyperscalers are taking control of inference economics.
Even in UBS’s TSMC stress test, Intel still reaches 12-17% of advanced packaging by 2030.
Sometimes the biggest winners come from market growth, not market share gains.
$INTC
DRAM shortage deepens into 2027e 📉
Morgan Stanley data:
2023: -4%
2024: -5%
2025: -4%
2026e: -17%
2027e: -15%
Absolute gap keeps widening.
2027 is shaping up to be the worst year in memory history.
$MU$SKHY$SSNLF
Hyperscaler capex isn’t stopping - it’s just slowing down.
Goldman sees $1.2T in 2027 and $1.4T in 2028. Growth drops from ~100% → 54% → 12%.
Cash flow is no longer enough. Debt will have to do more of the heavy lifting.