From Glass to Being Shot…Allegedly:
From day one, Megan’s story about when she realized she had been allegedly shot has never stayed the same.
That night, on bodycam, she told police, “I stepped on glass.” Hospital records from the same night confirmed her injuries as cuts from standing on glass.
Just four days after the incident, on 16th July, in her interview with Detective Stogner, she admitted, “I didn’t know I had been shot and didn’t want to make false allegations.”
On Instagram Live, she said the first time she learned she had allegedly been shot was when the doctor told her as the police were about to leave. According to Megan, they said, “Ma’am, you have bullets in one foot and fragments in another.”
Months later, her story shifted completely. On Gayle King, she claimed, “He is standing up over the window shooting… All I could think of was this man just shot me.” In court, she doubled down, testifying, “I knew I had just been shot.”
Then in her 2024 documentary, she backtracked again, saying, “I felt instant pain” and that it wasn’t until the doctors came in with the X-Ray she knew the full extent.
From stepping on glass to not knowing until doctors confirmed to claiming instant awareness then back to uncertainty, Megan’s story changes depending on the audience. The earliest, closest-in-time statements, made when the events were freshest in her memory, show confusion and hesitation.
Tory Lanez’s conviction rested on these inconsistent accounts. If the earliest statements are the most accurate, then why does Megan keep rewriting the story depending on the platform? Why did she tell police she stepped on glass, admit to Detective Stogner that she didn’t know she had been shot, claim on Instagram Live she only found out from the doctor, and later insist she knew instantly on Gayle King and in court? How can the court rely on testimony that changes so drastically? These contradictions raise serious questions about the credibility of the key witness and alleged victim whose story keeps shifting.