I still can't resist laughing, watching this on LooP again and again and I will pass out laughing 😂😂😂😂 I love the beat though, and WTF is Sam upto, just watchin him 🤣

EverOS is now a @convex-dev component. 🧠 Add persistent long-term memory to any Convex app, or to @convex-dev/agent in one line, backed by EverOS Cloud. Convex already gives agents the backend primitives they need: a reactive database, durable functions, scheduling, and threads. Now agents can remember across threads and sessions too. EverOS turns conversations into durable user memory: facts with timestamps and traceable sources, plus a profile that evolves over time. That memory belongs to the user and follows them across threads, sessions, models, and agents. Under the hood, EverOS delivers state-of-the-art results across long-term memory benchmarks. No vector database to run. No memory infrastructure to stitch together. Get it today: convex.dev/components/everos…

当你打开一个 vibe coding 出来的网站

最近真的有点看不懂这个创业市场了。 仿佛现在00后创业都不够年轻了，得是03后、05后，最好再加个“天才少年少女”的标签，才能成为资本市场的新宠。 可问题是，最大的00后也才26岁啊！ 更魔幻的是，我身边甚至有95年的朋友，为了迎合这种风气，在某书上把自己包装成03年的AI连续创业者。不可否认，他本身是一个很优秀的人，但我实在想不明白，为什么一个优秀的创始人，还需要靠虚报年龄来证明自己的价值？ 我一直认为，年轻确实意味着更多可能性，但创业终究是一场长期的考验。过往的创业研究也表明，成功创业者并不都是二十出头的年轻人，很多人在35岁甚至更晚才迎来事业的突破。 不知道从什么时候开始，我们似乎越来越热衷于制造“天才少年少女”的神话。今天把一个年轻人捧上神坛，明天又可能因为他没有达到外界的预期，而迫不及待地将他拉下来。 我不觉得这是一种适合年轻创业者成长的环境。 年轻本来是一件很美好的事情，但不应该成为一种需要不断刷新下限的竞争指标。一个人的价值，也不应该因为他是95后、00后还是05后而被重新定义。 比起一个又一个关于年龄的造神故事，我更希望看到的是，资本市场能够给予年轻人真正的耐心，让他们有时间试错、成长，慢慢做出真正有价值的东西。 毕竟，创业不是一场比谁出生得更晚的比赛。

Agents can be AI, but agency is human. It is every individual’s responsibility to empower our own agency, with the help of tools. But the North Star should always remain human centered.

Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement. I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible. But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier. Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want. Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ “shut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well. So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it. If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psyop.