Then came 2026.
The youth of this nation took to the streets to protest.
Mishra’s response was to say that “anti-social & anti-national forces” had entered the student protests, and to call upon the legal fraternity and intellectuals to counter them.
Think about how dangerous that language is.
If the first response to young people raising their voices is to label them “anti-national”, what are we teaching the next generation of lawyers about dissent?
That questioning power is a threat?
(7/N)