Conservative MP for West Suffolk • Shadow Justice Secretary • Promoted by Nick Timothy, Conservative Office, Moulton Road, CB8 8DY

West Suffolk
Labour tried to delete court records that helped expose the rape gangs. Journalists have used Courtsdesk to uncover some of the most horrific crimes. Labour would rather see them covered up. We fought back against their plans to wipe this vital archive. And we won.
Delighted to be able to say that Courtsdesk UK - our platform for the news media - is back. We have just made history with the first ever licence for computational use of restricted (and pretty much all) UK courts data. Some thoughts here! bit.ly/4hmAxyV
62
1,251
4,607
75,100
Here’s why Courtsdesk is so important. And how Labour tried to delete it.
We are about to lose a vital source of information about the worst crimes imaginable. From the rape gangs and migrant offenders, journalists have used Courtsdesk to expose what is really going on. But Labour are deleting the archive. 🧵 whatlaboursaid.com/stop-the-…
2
25
112
3,809
This must stop. We need to end legal aid for immigration cases. Shut down the immigration tribunals. And ensure fast, final decisions are made by ministers instead. No more never-ending legal challenges to frustrate deportations.
45
441
1,592
13,313
Labour's “Islamophobia" definition was almost certainly influenced by extremists. Now Angela Rayner's department says it has deleted all the records. But I submitted evidence. And if they deleted all the records my Subject Access Request should get a negative reply. They have to answer honestly - it's a legal requirement under the Data Protection Act 2018. But the Government says it needs more time because my case is "complex”. It is also refusing to reply to FOIs on the subject that should have received a response weeks ago. This is a cover-up. And I think we know what they're trying to hide.
144
1,336
4,688
51,793
This is not good enough. Sarah Steele was strangled and allegedly sexually assaulted by Jacob Wulfson, a US pilot then based at Lakenheath. Wulfson was tried in a US military court by a jury of fellow officers. He should have faced the English courts, but the police handed the case to the Americans. The NATO Status of Forces Agreement makes clear that the US military only has jurisdiction when an offence is committed on duty, against another member of the same armed forces or against a dependant. As the local MP and Shadow Justice Secretary, I wrote to David Lammy and then his successor, Alex Norris, about how the police and prosecutors handle these cases. Since then, other victims have contacted me. More recently, a US diplomat, allegedly a paedophile, was flown out of London to avoid prosecution here. This letter is the Justice Secretary’s reply. I asked who relinquished sovereignty in Sarah’s case. Norris said decisions on jurisdiction are a matter for the relevant police force. That may be so, but we still need to know who made the decision so there can be accountability and change. He refuses to say. I asked for an update on discussions with the US Government. He confirmed they are taking place but provided no detail. I asked what processes ensure crimes committed by base personnel are reported and prosecuted in England. Again, there was no real answer, only an assertion that the Government will “identify and learn lessons” from Sarah’s case, and confirmation that chief constables have been contacted. I asked the Ministry of Justice to review every case I have raised. Despite this concerning jurisdiction and justice in our own country, I was merely told my letter would be passed to the Foreign Office. In all, this reply is really not acceptable. It fails to address the main issues head-on. These cases clearly conflict with what is supposed to happen under the framework of the NATO Status of Forces Agreement 1951, and CPS guidance. The Justice Secretary failed to address this point, and just reiterated that there are “limited circumstances” where jurisdiction should be transferred.
11
101
445
11,917
Labour had a choice. They could have made our courts more efficient, and used the court rooms left unused. Instead, they attacked our ancient right to a jury trial. The result is a record high backlog. And victims are denied justice.
8
77
259
5,547
Two days later, and Dominic hasn't replied. He won't say if any these groups influenced the Government's "Islamophobia" definition: Muslim Council of Britain Muslim Association of Britain The Cordoba Foundation The UK Islamic Mission The Islamic Forum for Europe They're all named in the Muslim Brotherhood review of 2015. So why can't Dominic say if they - or any organisations affiliated to them - influenced the definition? He chaired the working group that proposed it, after all. nitter.net/NJ_Timothy/status/2102…
Dominic Grieve chaired the Government's "anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia" working group. I asked him at the time if the MCB or Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organisations were involved, and he refused to answer. There's a cover-up: the Government now says it has deleted all the records. But Dominic can just clear this up. Did his working group receive representations from any of the following organisations? Muslim Council of Britain Muslim Association of Britain The Cordoba Foundation The UK Islamic Mission The Islamic Forum for Europe Or any organisations that are affiliated to these bodies? nitter.net/dominicgrieve_/status/…
114
1,074
4,103
58,730
This is Labour’s new youth justice adviser. She's said Britain “doesn’t need” more prison places and hopes not a single new place will be used for female criminals - whatever their offence. When these people tell you who they are - listen.
92
362
1,735
200,031
The Government says it has a no-contact policy with the Muslim Council of Britain. But the Labour Party Conference will host an event featuring the MCB Secretary General. Why are Labour engaging with them? I have written to the Labour Party Chair.
111
1,726
5,702
48,802
Here is the event on the official Labour Party Conference agenda.
5
23
114
2,629
I asked the Justice Secretary a simple question: Does he think IPP prisoners are safe to release onto our streets? He didn’t answer - because he knows they're not. Labour previously said releasing IPP prisoners was too dangerous. Now they want to let them all out.
11
195
682
10,929
The Ministry of Justice admits that these people are dangerous. But say they are going to let them out anyway.
1
16
63
1,567
Islamists are trying to get John Cleese’s tour cancelled. They say he “attacked Islam”. And complain that “free speech has become a convenient shield for anti-Muslim hostility”. This is exactly why Labour’s “Islamophobia” definition is so dangerous. But who are they? 🧵
91
513
2,545
35,849
Deenified represent Islamism. And the corrupting politics of communalism. They are very clear that, “We’re not here to fit in; we’re here to make a change.”
4
28
262
3,609
This is not what Britain is. We need to be uncompromising to get our country back from groups like this. And fight against attempts to impose blasphemy laws that benefit Islamists. I stand with John Cleese.
14
56
570
4,426