A final data-point to add to the mix, released this morning: we have D+14 in the governor's race.
That's more Democratic than any of the other polls in the race
nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
A final data-point to add to the mix, released this morning: we have D+14 in the governor's race.
That's more Democratic than any of the other polls in the race
nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
Today, we have some significant and, at least to my mind, fun new methodological changes to the NYT/Siena poll (which found Platner+2)
nytimes.com/2026/06/29/upsho…
I'm going to break my self-imposed social media ban to note something that I might write if I wasn't leaving on a trip tonight:
If you want to solve gerrymandering, it is a solvable problem.
One solution that I'm not sure makes as much sense: a state-level proportionality standard (including the efficiency gap). Single-member districts don't yield proportionality; making them do so will require things that look like gerrymandering and/or be impossible
Still, there are a lot of viable options if you don't like gerrymandering. Compared to the status quo, it doesn't really matter which one you pick. You can even pick the one your opponent prefers. It'll be fine.