When it comes to HPV+ head & neck cancer, surveillance tools must perform where it matters most: Predicting true recurrence.
The NavDx® test outperforms traditional surveillance methods with ≥95% positive predictive value[1] versus physical exam with endoscopy (0-75%)[2,3] and PET/CT (8-30%).[4,5,6]
When false positives result in unnecessary imaging, procedures, and patient anxiety, test accuracy isn’t just academic. It’s clinical strategy.
Learn more about how the NavDx test can complement your surveillance protocol.
bit.ly/4t0ewZu
#NavDx #Naveris #Oncology #Diagnostics #PrecisionMedicine #HPV #HPVCancer #HeadAndNeckCancer #HNCancer
1. Hanna GJ, Roof SA, Jabalee J, et al. Negative predictive value of circulating tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV)-HPV DNA for HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer surveillance. Clin Cancer Res 2023. doi: 10.1158/ 1078-0432.CCR-23-1478.
2. Krabbe, C. A. et al. 18F-FDG PET as a routine posttreatment surveillance tool in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 50, 1940–1947 (2009).
3. Kostakoglu, L. et al. Early detection of recurrent disease by FDG-PET/CT leads to management changes in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. The Oncologist 18, 1108– 1117 (2013).
4. Moeller, B. J. et al. Prospective risk-adjusted [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography assessment of radiation response in head and neck cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 27, 2509–2515 (2009).
5. Kao, J. et al. The diagnostic and prognostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based follow-up after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cancer 115, 4586– 4594 (2009).
6. Wong, E. T. et al. 18 F-FDG PET/CT for locoregional surveillance following definitive treatment of head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis of reported studies. Head Neck 41, 551–561 (2019).