A review dedicate to the complex science of markets & digital laws.

The Minerva Papers, a new series by Jorge Padilla, opens today. Paper #1, “Dominance in Motion,” proposes a structured R&D-intensity test. A market share records who is ahead, not how hard that firm must work to stay ahead. networklawreview.org/dominan…
2
4
112
New series in the Network Law Review: The Minerva Papers, by Jorge Padilla (@CompassLexecon). Concept note is up. It is delightful, a must read. networklawreview.org/minerva… First essay tomorrow.
2
2
114
Here are @ProfSchrepel’s reading suggestions for August. Why breakup remedies rarely restore competition, confirmation bias in LLM pricing recommendations, whether Europe can scale, the wisdom of crowds in markets... networklawreview.org/august-…
3
86
If antitrust protects competition -not individual trading partners- when should economic dependence trigger intervention, and how does it differ from abuse of dominance? @GiuColangelo draws on transaction cost economics: it's about hold-up, not fairness. networklawreview.org/superio…
2
3
327
🎶Somewhere over the rainbow🎶 What improvements should make the final cut for the new Merger Guidelines? Jorge Padilla sets out the reforms he dreams of seeing: preserving skepticism and rigour, while rethinking the order and discipline of the analysis networklawreview.org/draft-m…
1
590
This month’s reading suggestions from @profschrepel. Inside: an LLM that predicts case outcomes, the fight over public ownership of the big AI labs, and whether you can tell when AI wrote the article. Plus Pinker on common knowledge. networklawreview.org/june-20…
1
84
Each month, the Network Law Review publishes curated reading lists selecting the most relevant new papers in antitrust, AI, and tech policy. Combined with case-law tracking across jurisdictions, it becomes a real working tool. Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscri… (it's free)
1
44
🎉 Celebrating the 10th issue of Antitrust Antidote! @kwongervin, Jeremy Kauffman, Jeremy Sandford, and Nathan Wilson share everything you need to know on US antitrust from April–June 2026: from the Nexstar-Tegna merger fight to Phhhoto v. Meta and beyond networklawreview.org/antidot…
2
3
278
In memoriam: Marius Schwartz (@Georgetown) In tribute to Marius, we are republishing the article today. We extend our deepest condolences to his family, to Yongmin Chen, and to his many colleagues and friends. networklawreview.org/default…
2
310
📚 Our Editor-in-Chief @ProfSchrepel shares his May reading suggestions: rugged landscapes & competition policy, populist antitrust’s error costs, the data-center water debate, EU AI-compute sovereignty, blockchain governance & more. networklawreview.org/may-202…
2
2
143
What if the most important innovations of the next decade aren’t in technology, but in institutions themselves? @profjasonpotts thinks they are. Come and listen to his provocative talk on i/acc. Live talk + Q&A with @profSchrepel 👇 alti.amsterdam/event/jason-p…
1
2
112
Firms innovate not along a smooth path but on “rugged technological landscapes”, balancing risky frontier breakthroughs against niche innovation. This has implications for competition policy, as argued by Professors Callander, Lambert, and Matouschek. networklawreview.org/rugged-…
1
41
Looking for a reliable way to track antitrust case law across jurisdictions? The Network Law Review runs dedicated series covering the U.S., Europe, and Latin America. No equivalent resource brings this together in one place. Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscri… (it's free)
1
57
📚 April 2026 reading suggestions are out. AI agents meet complexity economics. The waterbed effect collapses. The AI moat wobbles. Europe drifts into American dependence. Hayek’s papers go online. Barabási on networks. By @ProfSchrepel 👇 networklawreview.org/april-2….
2
3
154