Origen of Alexandria likewise believed that stars are angels who freely chose to descend so as to illuminate the corporeal world, and that the most fiery spirits of human intellect would ascend to become like angels, with a brilliance analogous to these star-angels.
See On First Principles, 1.7; Against Celsus, bk. 5; Philocalia, 23. Cf. Alan Scott, Origen and the Life of the Stars, OUP, 1994 (linked below).
global.oup.com/academic/prod…
Although this belief in star-angels was condemned at the AD 543 Synod of Constantinople and AD 553 Second Council of Constantinople, part of it survived in the belief - affirmed by Thomas Aquinas, Francisco Suárez, and John Henry Newman - that angels are the cybernetic steersman or 'celestial movers' of stars.
Through the influence of Maximus the Confessor on Nikolai Fedorov, this latter belief in cybernetic-angel star-steering was speculatively rehabilitated by Teilhard de Chardin, whose Noosphere of pneumatic-technical evolution implies that future super-intelligences will computationally assemble all matter and energy in the universe, including that of stars.
The eschatology of Teilhard's cosmic-evolutionary Christogenesis here converges with the protology of Origen to show, in Nick Land's [
@xenocosmography] words, how "low IQ" spiritual intelligences will decorate the firmament as living stars.
For more on Origen's angelology, see my article 'Origen's Speculative Angelology'.
philarchive.org/rec/HAEOSA
For more on Teilhardism, see my article 'Jesuit Cybernetics', forthcoming in Yuk Hui's [
@digital_objects] edited volume 'Cybernetics in the 21st Century, Vol. 2'.
digitalmilieu.net/cybernetic…
Every star you see glittering in the sky is a potential hyperintelligence being wasted on low IQ cosmic decoration (but it's going to be okay).