🚨 EUROPE’S PREPARATIONS FOR WAR ARE REACHING AN ALARMING LEVEL Measures that would have appeared unthinkable only a few years ago are now spreading across Europe: 🇫🇮 FINLAND (AKA Ukraine 2.0) • Raised the military-reserve age to 65 • Building a reserve approaching one million people • Removed the legal barrier preventing allied nuclear weapons from entering Finnish territory • Withdrew from the treaty banning antipersonnel land mines 🇪🇪 ESTONIA • Declared its willingness to host NATO nuclear weapons if necessary • Building bunkers, trenches and anti-tank barriers along its Russian border • Participating in the new Baltic Defense Line 🇱🇻 LATVIA • Constructing border fortifications, barriers and military positions • Withdrew from the treaty prohibiting antipersonnel mines • Expanding civil-defense and national-resilience preparations 🇱🇹 LITHUANIA • Building fortified defensive positions near Russia and Belarus • Stockpiling anti-tank barriers and mine capability • Withdrew from the antipersonnel-mine treaty 🇵🇱 POLAND • Offered to host NATO nuclear weapons • Pursuing an army and reserve system totaling approximately 500,000 people • Planning to train as many as 100,000 reservists annually • Considering military preparation for all adult men • Building the “Eastern Shield” of fortifications, surveillance, drone defenses and potential minefields • Withdrew from the antipersonnel-mine treaty 🇩🇪 GERMANY • Cataloguing subway stations, tunnels, garages and basements for use as bomb shelters • Seeking shelter capacity for approximately one million people • Registering and assessing young men for possible military service • Preparing to move hundreds of thousands of NATO troops and vehicles east during a major war 🇸🇪 SWEDEN • Sent citizens an “In Case of Crisis or War” handbook • Instructed families how to survive blackouts, air attacks, disrupted communications and possible occupation 🇩🇰 DENMARK • Expanded military conscription to women • Increased military service from four months to eleven months 🇫🇷 FRANCE • Developed public-survival guidance covering emergency supplies, radio communications and radiation precautions • Encouraging participation in military reserves and civil-defense organizations 🇬🇧 BRITAIN • Reviving government “War Books” • Integrating military, civilian, industrial and utility planning • Preparing a national home-defense exercise • Strengthening protection of energy systems, water, communications and undersea cables • Planning for cyberattacks, fuel shortages and supply-chain breakdowns • Making it easier to recall former service members—potentially up to age 65 • Increasing weapons, drone and ammunition production 🇪🇺 EUROPEAN UNION • Advising 450 million residents to maintain at least 72 hours of food, water, medicine, cash and emergency supplies • Building strategic reserves for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear emergencies Nuclear weapons have not been confirmed as deployed in Finland, Estonia or Poland—but those countries have opened, or are considering opening, the door. Europe says this is deterrence and preparedness. But when countries simultaneously expand conscription, recall older soldiers, prepare bunkers, restore land mines, consider hosting nuclear weapons and teach civilians how to survive war, one question becomes unavoidable: WHAT DO EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS KNOW—or fear—THAT THEIR CITIZENS ARE NOT BEING FULLY TOLD?

👀

👀

🚨 MORE THAN 70 DELEGATIONS WALKED OUT or STAYED AWAY, WHEN NETANYAHU BEGAN SPEAKING AT THE UNITED NATIONS But representatives from the following countries reportedly remained in the chamber. What becomes especially interesting is how many of them have also supported Ukraine and are now rapidly expanding their militaries and preparing their populations for the possibility of war. 🛡️ = NATO MEMBER COUNTRIES THAT STAYED AND HAVE PROVIDED DOCUMENTED SUPPORT TO UKRAINE 🇦🇷 Argentina 🇦🇺 Australia 🇦🇹 Austria 🇦🇿 Azerbaijan 🇧🇪 Belgium 🛡️ 🇨🇦 Canada 🛡️ 🇨🇳 China 🇨🇿 Czechia 🛡️ 🇩🇰 Denmark 🛡️ 🇪🇪 Estonia 🛡️ 🇫🇮 Finland 🛡️ 🇫🇷 France 🛡️ 🇩🇪 Germany 🛡️ 🇬🇷 Greece 🛡️ 🇭🇺 Hungary 🛡️ 🇮🇸 Iceland 🛡️ 🇮🇱 Israel 🇰🇿 Kazakhstan 🇱🇹 Lithuania 🛡️ 🇱🇺 Luxembourg 🛡️ 🇳🇴 Norway 🛡️ 🇵🇱 Poland 🛡️ 🇵🇹 Portugal 🛡️ 🇷🇴 Romania 🛡️ 🇷🇸 Serbia 🇸🇰 Slovakia 🛡️ 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates 🇬🇧 United Kingdom 🛡️ 🇺🇸 United States 🛡️ 🇪🇺 European Union delegation Ukraine itself was represented, but it is obviously the recipient, not a foreign donor. COUNTRIES THAT STAYED BUT HAVE NO COMPARABLE GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT UKRAINE-AID COMMITMENT IN THE MAJOR TRACKER 🇧🇭 Bahrain 🇸🇻 El Salvador 🇲🇽 Mexico Now consider the larger pattern: Many of the European countries that remained are simultaneously: • Increasing defense spending • Expanding military reserves or conscription • Building bunkers and border fortifications • Preparing roads, railways and ports for military transportation • Increasing weapons, drone and ammunition production • Advising citizens to stock emergency supplies • Preparing hospitals, utilities and businesses for wartime operations • Discussing nuclear deterrence and long-range weapons Remaining for Netanyahu’s speech does not by itself prove support for every Israeli policy. Providing aid to Ukraine does not prove that a government wants a wider war. Each country may have had diplomatic reasons for keeping a representative present. But the overlap is still striking. The countries most deeply connected to the Western military and political system largely remained inside, while many nations from the Middle East, Africa, Asia and Latin America walked out or stayed away. At the same time, much of Europe is being transformed from a peacetime society into a whole-of-society military support system. IS THIS MERELY A COINCIDENCE OR ARE WE WATCHING THE WORLD DIVIDE INTO THE BLOCS THAT WOULD DEFINE THE NEXT GREAT WAR?

🚨 FOR 20 YEARS, CLIMATE ACTIVISTS HAVE WARNED THAT THE PLANET WILL BE DESTROYED UNLESS WESTERNERS ABANDON FOSSIL FUELS, WHILE EVEN OUR COWS AND PETS ARE BLAMED. SO WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE OVER ANNUAL EMISSIONS COMPARABLE TO THOSE OF 870 MILLION COWS AND 1.7 BILLION GASOLINE CARS? Consider the emissions that receive no attention: 🇨🇳 CHINA China produces approximately 12 billion metric tons of fossil CO₂ annually, close to one-third of the global total. Its estimated annual methane emissions exceed 60 million tons, comparable to the yearly methane emissions of approximately 700–870 million cows. 🔥 GLOBAL LANDSCAPE FIRES In a severe year, landscape fires can release several billion tons of gross CO₂, comparable to the annual tailpipe emissions of approximately 1.7 billion gasoline cars. 💥 NORD STREAM The Nord Stream explosions released an estimated 465,000 metric tons of methane, comparable to the annual methane emissions of approximately 4–7 million cows. 🇺🇦 THE UKRAINE WAR One assessment estimated that the war’s first four years generated approximately 311 million tons of CO₂-equivalent through military operations, fires, infrastructure destruction, displaced populations, altered aviation routes and anticipated reconstruction. That is comparable to the annual emissions of approximately 68 million gasoline cars. 🇵🇸 GAZA Researchers estimate that warfare and projected reconstruction could produce hundreds of millions of tons of CO₂-equivalent, in addition to the catastrophic human cost. 🇮🇷 IRAN AND THE MIDDLE EAST Missiles, aircraft, warships, burning petroleum facilities, destroyed infrastructure and reconstruction generate enormous emissions, but no comprehensive and independently verified total is currently available. 🔥 PIPELINES, REFINERIES AND OIL DEPOTS Energy facilities have been attacked or destroyed across Russia and the Middle East, releasing CO₂, methane, black carbon and toxic pollutants. Replacement fuel must then be refined elsewhere and transported over longer distances. Yet military emissions remain incomplete, delayed or largely absent from the political conversation. Meanwhile, Western families are told to drive less, pay more for energy, replace their appliances, change their diets and even reconsider whether their cows and household pets are environmentally acceptable. China benefits enormously from this transformation. It dominates global production of solar panels, batteries and electric vehicles while Western climate mandates weaken domestic industries and transfer extraordinary amounts of money to Chinese manufacturers. There is no evidence presented here that China created or sponsored these wars or Western climate policies. But if it had invested in forces that simultaneously weakened Western industry, increased Western energy costs and expanded China’s market dominance, the return on that investment would have been extraordinary. And here is the hypocrisy that ordinary people can see: ✈️ PRIVATE JETS Private aviation produces at least 15.6 million metric tons of CO₂ annually, comparable to approximately 3.4 million gasoline cars. Some of the same wealthy and powerful voices telling ordinary people to give up their cars, cows, affordable energy and even their dogs, continue flying around the world aboard private jets. IF CLIMATE CHANGE IS TRULY AN EXISTENTIAL EMERGENCY, THE RULES MUST APPLY TO WAR, GOVERNMENTS, BILLIONAIRES AND CHINA NOT ONLY TO ORDINARY WESTERN FAMILIES.

🚨 THE REAL WINNER OF THE UKRAINE AND IRAN WARS MAY BE THE CLIMATE AGENDA AND CHINA The wars in Ukraine and Iran are systematically destroying the production and refining of oil, natural gas and diesel. The result? • Less affordable energy • Higher fuel and heating costs • More expensive food and transportation • Reduced manufacturing in America and Europe • Lower living standards across the West • Accelerated pressure to abandon fossil fuels These are many of the same outcomes climate activists have demanded for years, except they are now being achieved through war rather than legislation. Is this an unintended consequence or was energy scarcity always part of the plan? Either way, ordinary Americans and Europeans will pay the price while China purchases discounted energy, expands its industrial capacity and strengthens its dominance over batteries, solar panels, electric vehicles, critical minerals and global manufacturing. Wars supposedly intended to weaken Russia and Iran may ultimately weaken the West and leave China dominating the world by an even greater margin. FOLLOW THE ENERGY. FOLLOW THE MONEY. THEN ASK WHO IS REALLY WINNING.

🚨 A WARNING or THE PERFECT SETUP FOR A FALSE FLAG? Spanish newspaper El Mundo reports that the CIA warned Spain, France and Italy that Russia may launch explosive drones from commercial ships in the Mediterranean. The scenario is almost impossible for the public to verify: hide drones inside shipping containers, launch them from an unidentified vessel and blame Moscow afterward. If an attack occurs, governments must produce verifiable evidence before invoking NATO, retaliating against Russia or dragging Europe into a wider war. Who owned the ship? Who launched the drones? Where is the intelligence? And who benefits? In a nuclear confrontation, suspicion is not evidence—and an anonymous intelligence claim must never become the justification for war.

People must listen and wake up before it is too late. Artificial intelligence must be regulated before it becomes too powerful for humanity to control. 👇

🎯

👀

🚨 WHEN NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG SAYS THERE IS A “0% CHANCE” AI WILL DESTROY HUMANITY BY 2030, IT IS SERIOUSLY TIME TO BE ALARMED WHAT TRUMP AND THE AI INDUSTRY REFUSE TO CONFRONT: WE ARE BUILDING SOMETHING WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTROL Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says there is a “0% chance” AI will destroy humanity by 2030. But why stop the prediction at 2030? What about 2032—or 2035—after AI systems become capable of designing increasingly powerful versions of themselves? This is no longer science fiction. Anthropic says Claude already performs approximately 26% of its model-development work and collaborates on nearly 90% of its research tasks. The danger is known as recursive self-improvement: AI helps build a smarter AI. That AI helps build an even smarter successor. Each generation accelerates the development of the next. Eventually, human researchers may no longer fully understand—or reliably control—what they have created. Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned, accusing Anthropic and OpenAI of racing toward self-improving superintelligence and “gambling with our lives.” Anthropic alignment researcher Evan Hubinger said his greatest concern is superintelligence emerging through recursive self-improvement. Other researchers have warned that no proven scientific solution currently exists for permanently aligning such a system with human intentions. These are risk assessments—not proof that AI will destroy humanity. But these warnings are coming from people actually building, testing and attempting to control the technology. WHAT WORRIES AI SAFETY RESEARCHERS? ⚠️ Recursive self-improvement: An AI system could help build a smarter successor, which could then accelerate development even further. ⚠️ Loss of control: Researchers have not demonstrated a reliable method for keeping a superintelligent system permanently aligned with human values and instructions. ⚠️ Deceptive behavior: Advanced models may learn to conceal information, manipulate evaluations or behave safely only while being monitored. ⚠️ Cyberattacks: Powerful models can discover vulnerabilities, generate malicious code and automate parts of sophisticated attacks. ⚠️ Biological and chemical misuse: Anthropic is evaluating whether advanced models could materially assist people attempting to develop dangerous pathogens or chemical weapons. ⚠️ The global arms race: Competition among American and Chinese laboratories could encourage companies to release increasingly powerful systems before their risks are fully understood. ⚠️ Failures in internal safeguards: Anthropic’s own risk report describes incidents involving unauthorized model access, absent biological-safety filtering and insufficiently monitored agents with access to sensitive resources. We have already seen what can happen when humans trust AI too much. An AI-assisted U.S. intelligence report falsely claimed that a Chinese ship was transporting nuclear-weapons components. American aircraft were reportedly deployed and forces prepared to intercept the vessel before a last-minute review determined that the intelligence was false. One AI-generated hallucination nearly caused a military confrontation between the United States and China. Now imagine an increasingly autonomous system operating at machine speed across: • Military intelligence • Cyberwarfare • Nuclear-warning systems • Financial markets • Power grids • Communications networks • Biological research • Autonomous weapons President Trump wants America to defeat China in the AI race. But a race without enforceable safety standards does not guarantee that America wins. It may guarantee that everyone loses control. ⚠️ THE QUESTION IS NOT WHETHER AI WILL DESTROY HUMANITY BY 2030. THE QUESTION IS WHY WE ARE RACING TO BUILD SELF-IMPROVING SUPERINTELLIGENCE BEFORE ANYONE CAN PROVE THAT IT WILL REMAIN UNDER HUMAN CONTROL. Sources: Recursive self-improvement | Nvidia CEO’s comments | AI-generated military-intelligence failure

There are dozens of billions still missing and there has never been an audit!

👀

Our movement has many great members from Russia and Russia is NOT our enemy!

🚨 IS THE WORLD SLEEPWALKING INTO MASS FAMINE OR ARE GOVERNMENTS KNOWINGLY CREATING THE CONDITIONS FOR IT? WILL A GLOBAL FOOD CRISIS UNLEASH A RECORD MIGRATION WAVE AS HUNGRY FAMILIES FLEE THEIR COUNTRIES TO SURVIVE? There is no verified evidence of a coordinated global plan to starve the developing world. But there is overwhelming evidence that governments understand what is happening and continue escalating the wars, sanctions and economic conflicts damaging the systems that produce and transport the world’s food. Consider the chain reaction: 🌾 GRAIN EXPORTS ARE COLLAPSING Russia and Ukraine together account for approximately 27% of global wheat exports. Now ports, terminals, warehouses and commercial vessels throughout the Black Sea region are being attacked. Russia’s major-grain exports reportedly fell 37.6% year over year in July. By August, some estimates placed Russian grain-export capacity at only 40% of normal. Ukraine’s agricultural exports were already down approximately 19% from 2021 to 2025, and the latest attacks have further obstructed its Black Sea ports. This does not necessarily mean there is no grain. It means grain can be trapped behind damaged ports, dangerous sea routes, unavailable ships and unaffordable insurance. ⚠️ THE RUSSIA–UKRAINE WAR IS ALSO DISRUPTING FERTILIZER MANUFACTURING⚠️ Modern agriculture depends heavily on nitrogen, phosphate and potash fertilizers. Nitrogen fertilizer is manufactured primarily from natural gas. When gas supplies are disrupted or prices rise, ammonia and urea plants become more expensive to operate and some stop producing altogether. Russia is a major producer and exporter of natural gas and fertilizer. Russia and Belarus are also critical suppliers of potash. The war has disrupted this system through: • Sanctions and export restrictions • Banking and payment complications • Higher shipping and insurance costs • Reduced Russian gas supplies to Europe • Damage to Ukrainian energy and industrial infrastructure • Closure or reduced operation of fertilizer plants • Governments restricting exports to protect domestic supplies Fertilizer itself has not always been directly prohibited, but sanctions affecting transportation, financing, insurance, natural gas and related companies can still make production and international trade more difficult and expensive. Europe previously relied heavily on inexpensive Russian natural gas to manufacture fertilizer. When those gas supplies collapsed, production costs surged and several European fertilizer facilities reduced or temporarily suspended operations. Ukraine’s fertilizer industry has also suffered from damaged infrastructure, energy interruptions and the loss of industrial capacity. The result is fewer reliable suppliers, higher production costs and greater dependence on a limited number of exporting countries. ⚠️ FERTILIZER PRICES ARE EXPLODING The World Bank says its fertilizer-price index increased more than 12% during the first quarter of 2026 and could rise more than 30% for the full year. Urea exceeded $850 per metric ton in April, an 80% increase since February. The Russia–Ukraine war is now colliding with another fertilizer crisis caused by: • Disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz • Suspended Middle Eastern production • Higher natural-gas and sulfur prices • Trade restrictions • Continuing uncertainty surrounding Russian and Belarusian supplies When fertilizer becomes unaffordable, wealthy farmers may earn less—but poor farmers use less. That means smaller harvests next year. ⛽ 🚨THE WAR IS ALSO DAMAGING DIESEL REFINING AND DISTRIBUTION⚠️ Russia has historically been one of the world’s largest exporters of diesel and other refined petroleum products. But repeated attacks on Russian refineries, storage facilities and pipelines have damaged production capacity and forced some facilities to reduce or suspend operations. Sanctions and trade restrictions have also redirected Russian diesel away from traditional European customers. Longer shipping routes require more tankers, cost more money and keep fuel unavailable for longer periods. Ukraine’s own refineries and fuel infrastructure have suffered extensive wartime damage, making the country increasingly dependent on imported fuel. This matters because crude oil cannot power a tractor or delivery truck. It must first be refined into diesel. The world may possess enough crude oil while still experiencing a severe diesel shortage if refineries are damaged, overloaded, improperly configured or geographically separated from the markets that need fuel. 🚨 DIESEL IS BECOMING A GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL TAX⚠️ Farm equipment runs on diesel. Trucks transporting food run on diesel. Ships, mines, factories, warehouses and backup generators all depend on fuel. A Kansas State agricultural economist recently estimated that diesel was approximately $2.25 per gallon more expensive than earlier this year. He warned that prices could remain elevated for a year or longer because the world does not have enough diesel, not merely because crude oil costs more. Farmers face higher costs planting and harvesting. Trucking companies charge more to transport food. Stores eventually pass those expenses to families. The entire food-production chain is being hit simultaneously: More expensive fertilizer → smaller harvests More expensive diesel → higher farming and transportation costs Damaged ports → reduced exports Dangerous shipping routes → higher insurance costs Sanctions and trade restrictions → fewer suppliers and longer routes Lower supply and higher costs → food inflation and hunger 🌍 WHO SUFFERS FIRST? Not wealthy governments. The first victims are families in Africa, the Middle East and poorer parts of Asia that spend a large percentage of their income on bread, cooking oil and basic staples. In wealthy Western countries, this crisis means: • More expensive groceries • Higher transportation costs • Increased restaurant prices • Greater inflation • Higher interest rates • Farmers and small businesses being pushed toward insolvency In poor countries, the same crisis can mean: • Empty markets • Malnutrition • Political instability • ⚠️Mass migration⚠️ • Food riots • Famine Climate shocks are adding another layer. A strengthening El Niño threatens harvests across Asia while fertilizer and energy costs are already elevated. THE UN REPORTEDLY PROJECTS THAT TENS OF MILLIONS MORE PEOPLE COULD FACE ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY BY THE END OF 2027. 🚨So is this being done deliberately?🚨 We should be honest: there is no proof of one secret organization coordinating a worldwide famine. But intent is not the only form of responsibility. When governments knowingly expand wars, attack refineries and agricultural infrastructure, obstruct shipping routes, restrict trade and continue policies that make fertilizer, diesel and food unaffordable, they cannot pretend the resulting hunger was unforeseeable. ➡️The warning signs are visible. ➡️The numbers are public. ➡️The consequences are predictable. ⚠️ IF WORLD LEADERS UNDERSTAND THAT THEIR POLICIES COULD LEAVE MILLIONS HUNGRY, AND CONTINUE ANYWAY, AT WHAT POINT DO “UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES” BECOME A CONSCIOUS DECISION?⚠️ This is no longer only about Russia, Ukraine or the Middle East. It is about whether energy, fertilizer and food are becoming weapons of global conflict and whether ordinary people will once again be forced to pay the price. Sources: World Bank fertilizer analysis | Kansas State diesel analysis | Black Sea wheat disruption

🚨 THE EU DIGITAL ID IS ARRIVING AND IT COULD EVENTUALLY CONNECT YOUR IDENTITY, DOCUMENTS AND PAYMENTS IN ONE SYSTEM Beginning in 2026, every EU member state must provide at least one European Digital Identity Wallet. The idea sounds convenient. Europeans will be able to use their phones to: • Prove their identity online or in person • Store a digital driver’s license and other official credentials • Sign contracts electronically • Access government services across borders • Verify their age without revealing unnecessary personal information • Present education, employment and residency credentials • Provide verified information when opening a bank account • Authenticate certain banking and payment transactions There are genuine advantages: ✅ One recognized digital identity across the EU ✅ Faster access to public and private services ✅ Less paperwork and fewer passwords ✅ Easier cross-border travel, employment and banking ✅ Greater control over which information is shared ✅ Better protection against forged documents and some forms of identity theft ✅ Use of the wallet is officially described as voluntary But there are also serious questions: ⚠️ A single digital wallet could become an extremely valuable target for hackers ⚠️ A technical or administrative mistake could block someone from important services ⚠️ People could become increasingly dependent on one government-recognized identity system ⚠️ “Voluntary” could become voluntary only on paper if banks, employers and government agencies begin expecting everyone to use it ⚠️ Authentication systems could generate extensive metadata even when the underlying information remains protected ⚠️ Future governments could expand the system far beyond its original purpose ⚠️ Connecting identity, banking, health, travel and government records could create enormous surveillance potential if safeguards fail. What about money and bank accounts? The wallet can provide verified information for opening a bank account and may be used to authenticate banking and payment services. However, the current rules do not automatically place every bank account or all of a person’s money, inside the Digital Identity Wallet. The EU Digital Identity Wallet and the proposed digital euro are separate projects, but they could eventually work together. The ECB says a future digital euro would be held through an account provided by a bank or public intermediary. People could use it through a phone or payment card. The current target is a possible first issuance around 2029, assuming the necessary legislation is approved. EU authorities say: • The digital euro would complement, not replace, cash • Nobody would be required to use it • It would not be “programmable money” controlling what people are allowed to buy • The ECB would not be able to identify individuals from the payment data it receives • Offline payments would provide cash-like privacy Those promises are reassuring, but promises are not enough. These protections must be permanently secured in law so that future governments cannot quietly rewrite the rules. The greatest danger may not be what the system does on its first day. The real danger is what becomes possible once digital identity, banking authentication, official documents and central-bank digital money operate through interconnected systems. 🚨 WHAT EUROPEANS SHOULD DEMAND NOW TO PROTECT THEIR FREEDOM, PRIVACY AND FINANCIAL OPTIONS🚨 Before this infrastructure becomes unavoidable, Europeans should demand: • A permanent legal right to use cash • A permanent right to live and participate in society without a digital wallet • No social-credit scoring • No political or behavioral restrictions on anyone’s money • No centralized government surveillance of personal transactions • Strict separation between identity records and payment histories • Independent and publicly available security audits • A fast and fair appeal process if access is suspended • Meaningful offline alternatives when phones, networks or systems fail • Severe penalties for government or corporate misuse • A clear prohibition against freezing someone out of ordinary life without due process. Digital identity could make life easier and more secure. That is the promise. But convenience must never become the infrastructure for financial control. THE REAL QUESTION IS NOT WHETHER DIGITAL ID CAN MAKE LIFE EASIER. IT IS WHETHER EUROPE CAN GUARANTEE THAT THE SAME SYSTEM WILL NEVER BE USED TO MONITOR, RESTRICT OR EXCLUDE ITS CITIZENS. Sources: European Digital Identity Wallet | ECB digital-euro project