If Kamala Harris does go on to lose this election, and I believe it is a 50-50 race and likely to stay such, I really believe yesterday’s interview with Stephanie Ruhle will be the moment the loss can be traced to. Seeing no less than the
@nytimes Times HAMMER these two for their just insulting, pitiful, ridiculous display of vapidity tells you all you need to know.
I can go on and on and on in my critiques of former President Trump, and I have, and I will; but Harris’s:
(A) unwillingness to answer direct questions
(B inability to understand very basic economics
(C) patronizing deference to bumper sticker answers vs. policy substance, and
(D) catastrophic policy ideas where she does bother to present any …
all point to huge vulnerabilities in the major questions voters have for her. And to choose this suck-up know-nothing bigot,
@SRuhle Ruhle, to do the interview three days after she said “Trump is so bad Kamala should not have to answer any questions” is just, well, fitting.