One thing that I’m curious about re BH’s 1 year post TGE refund right from Berachain’s Series B:
Most token warrants I’ve seen have a sort of token lockup MFN—no lockups on an investor can be more restrictive than that given to another Insider.
Bera’s docs show that only 1/6 of investor tokens unlock after a year. If these investors have such a token lockup MFN, it would seem that BH’s refund right would trigger it—being able to refund 100% of your tokens IMO is a lot less restrictive than having 5/6 of your tokens locked up.
Of course there could be some reason that I’m not privy to (admittedly
I have very little info here) why this wouldn’t be the case: Berachain’s investors don’t have this token lockup MFN, their lawyers figured out some cleaver structuring to get around it, etc.
But from most token investment docs I’ve seen and worked on, I’d expect this investor right to be triggered, altering their lockups to be as restrictive as BHs…
For the record, giving post-TGE refund rights to an investor is insane. I typically like to explain scenarios and risks to clients without pushing too hard on what a client should do.
But this is something that I 100% would have been kicking and screaming to my client about—it’s just that bad.
I’ve done a ton of crypto startup venture financings, and while I’ve sometimes seen refund rights in SAFTs for projects that don’t launch a token by a certain time, a POST-TGE refund is ludicrous. Removes the downside of being a. Investor.