Danube Institute Fellowship Recipient on family policy. Evo. psych (not strictly materialist). Bylines: @TPostMillennial & @hu_conservative. Lumpenfrau.
Northumberland, UK
- Tweets 39,935
- Following 895
- Followers 15,602
- Likes 30,994
Pinned Tweet
This is one of my central hypotheses in the book I'm writing called "The Rise of Female Chauvinism". I've been reluctant to tweet about it because so many of my original hypotheses appear later in outlets like @COMPACTMagazin or @unherd. But here we go, you heard it first here folks.
The GAME is more complex. The Davos elites funding feminists since the late 80s. Feminists were HIRED by the "patriarchy". Why? Socialism always failed because male average psychology is essentially hierarchical & meritocratic. Female average psychology is not. The feminisation of CULTURE is a TOOL to this end. The mechanism works via critical mass theory, which is what DEI is actually all about. Put people unfit for the job in positions of power and let them do what comes naturally, systems will fail. This will happen even though those DEI hires are trying their very best not to fail. So begins a very emotional and reactionary game of chess. Except the first move was never played by either opponent.
3
3
21
1,026
Some books that had a big impact on the evolution of my thinking over the last decade. myninebooks.com/
1
2
159
The viral moral panic around Cornell IS the goal for feminists. They don't care if they ruin the boys lives or this girls.
101
A mountain of consent evidence.
The Cornell case is funny because they had verbal consent with witnesses and written consent after the fact through text messages and that’s probably more proof of consent than any sexual encounter anyone has ever had yet half the country still thinks they’re rapists.
1
8
464
Feminists are going to ruin her life more than one night in Kokbang.
Jane Doe seems cool actually, I could imagine being friends with her in college, maybe she exercised poor judgment, but so what, she was 20, almost everyone exercises poor judgment at that age, at least to some extent -- it's horrible that things had to escalate the way they did
11
496
Yep. I'm not afraid of referencing other minds who independently come up with the same hypotheses. It gives greater credence to me. But these bitches who steal my stuff then coast on banalites afterwards really twist my melons
Well that does explain fairly well why she's covers her less-than-mediocre thinking with moralism, but occasionally says something that's way out of profile for her normal standard.
1
8
447
Paula Wright 🦚 retweeted
Yeah. I'm not afraid of referencing other minds who independently come up with the same hypotheses. It gives greater credence to me. But these bitches who steal my stuff then coast on banalites afterwards really twist my melons
1
1
3
188
Yes. The aims of feminism, in print, have always been explicit. The words of feminists are protean, shape shifting, or by their own term, discursive.
Outstanding and incredibly well researched article. Probably one of the most important I've seen in years. Bravo 👏
"The 2023 book Tackling Rape Culture: Ending Patriarchy argues that dismantling patriarchy within the justice system is essential for achieving feminist goals. This includes perpetuating now-debunked “rape myths” about low convictions, jury bias, and victim-blaming".
2
373
Paula Wright 🦚 retweeted
"Feminism is not about helping women, it's a project to dismantle western civilisation"
Amongst the Cornell hysteria, feminists are once again lying about rape conviction rates. They have been told, time and time again, for decades, to stop doing this as it stops victims coming forward. It's time for us all to realise this is feminisms goal. Feminism is not about helping women, it's a project to dismantle western civilisation. On @megynkelly yesterday, @HMDatMI said this was a war against men. It's a war against us all. I've researched and written on this for many years and been ostracised because of it. I hope both Megyn and Heather can look into this. Short article below with longer under that. paulawrightdysmemics.com/p/d…
4
19
375
Paula Wright 🦚 retweeted
I'm derided as a "nobody" & whatever else. Yet they, especially Claire Lehmann, would be nowhere without me.
1
1
2
182
Paula Wright 🦚 retweeted
Exactly. Mary Harrington, after consulting with me on one of her most influential articles in @unherd, wrote this & was rewarded. She then unfollowed & ghosted me.
2
1
4
345
This is one of my central hypotheses in the book I'm writing called "The Rise of Female Chauvinism". I've been reluctant to tweet about it because so many of my original hypotheses appear later in outlets like @COMPACTMagazin or @unherd. But here we go, you heard it first here folks.
The GAME is more complex. The Davos elites funding feminists since the late 80s. Feminists were HIRED by the "patriarchy". Why? Socialism always failed because male average psychology is essentially hierarchical & meritocratic. Female average psychology is not. The feminisation of CULTURE is a TOOL to this end. The mechanism works via critical mass theory, which is what DEI is actually all about. Put people unfit for the job in positions of power and let them do what comes naturally, systems will fail. This will happen even though those DEI hires are trying their very best not to fail. So begins a very emotional and reactionary game of chess. Except the first move was never played by either opponent.
3
3
21
1,026
.
Also, if you want to wait until all of my previous hypotheses, like the feminisation of culture, are mainstream, it will be too late to do anything about it. I have a testable research design, but, as we also know, fitness beats truth even and especially when truth & profit go head to head. I'm suppressed so robustly by profiteers, because I'm a threat to that model. It's a tale as old as scientific time.
1
54
Paula Wright 🦚 retweeted
*Often appears in derivative form in mainstream(ish) media as if it's an original idea. Example: Mary Harrington of @unherd
followed me and I consulted with with her on her influential article on female intrasexual competition. She then unfollowed me & didn't mention my name in her article. Let me just say, never trust ANYONE who calls themselves a feminist, reactionary or not. Of course the next move is to forsake the term. Look to actions not words. We're surrounded by serpents.
2
6
129
The GAME is more complex. The Davos elites funding feminists since the late 80s. Feminists were HIRED by the "patriarchy". Why? Socialism always failed because male average psychology is essentially hierarchical & meritocratic. Female average psychology is not. The feminisation of CULTURE is a TOOL to this end. The mechanism works via critical mass theory, which is what DEI is actually all about. Put people unfit for the job in positions of power and let them do what comes naturally, systems will fail. This will happen even though those DEI hires are trying their very best not to fail. So begins a very emotional and reactionary game of chess. Except the first move was never played by either opponent.
Mostly we need to teach young men not to have sex outside of committed, loving relationships if they don't want to get sued, canceled, fired, arrested or imprisoned by infantilized women who don't know their own minds.
5
7
57
2,049
"25 years after The Stern Report, feminists refuse to do the one simple thing that would help more victims achieve justice: tell the truth!"
Amongst the Cornell hysteria, feminists are once again lying about rape conviction rates. They have been told, time and time again, for decades, to stop doing this as it stops victims coming forward. It's time for us all to realise this is feminisms goal. Feminism is not about helping women, it's a project to dismantle western civilisation. On @megynkelly yesterday, @HMDatMI said this was a war against men. It's a war against us all. I've researched and written on this for many years and been ostracised because of it. I hope both Megyn and Heather can look into this. Short article below with longer under that. paulawrightdysmemics.com/p/d…
1
6
26
602