JUST IN: Claude unexpectedly makes progress on the 167-year-old Riemann hypothesis — one of mathematics’ most notorious unsolved problems.

Aug 10, 2026 · 7:12 PM UTC

137
370
7,014
591,724
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @Polymarket
Is there anything claude can't do?
4
4
6,050
Replying to @Polymarket
and humans still struggle to split a dinner bill five ways
2
189
Replying to @Polymarket
If AI can meaningfully advance problems like this, research could enter a new era. @DigiMaaya is watching this development closely
1
15
Replying to @Polymarket
The Riemann Hypothesis is a 167-year-old question about whether there’s a hidden mathematical pattern governing the seemingly random distribution of prime numbers: Proving it would confirm a fundamental rule about primes and turn thousands of mathematical results that currently depend on “assuming RH is true” into proven theorems. It wouldn’t instantly break crypto or change finance, but it would be a landmark discovery about one of the deepest structures in mathematics.
75
Replying to @Polymarket
1) What?
66
Replying to @Polymarket
Can someone share the link to the progress?
126
Replying to @Polymarket
claude is a math guy now
141
Replying to @Polymarket
math is getting way too wild lately
114
Replying to @Polymarket
A 167-year-old problem getting cracked is genuinely wild to think about
53
Replying to @Polymarket
If it’s actually real, that’s the biggest news in math history. I need to see the proof before I start celebrating though.
555
Replying to @Polymarket
Would you like to learn how powerful you are as a human being? Would you like to learn about the nuts & bolts of the system? Would you like to learn about secret gov technology? My audio cuts out at the 5 hour mark so stay tuned for Part II tomorrow👇😉💯 x.com/i/broadcasts/1qJVmyQBv…
1
48
Replying to @Polymarket
Daily reminder for Mathematicians experimenting with AI without any deep understanding on what are the current technology limitations and challenges.
1
156
Replying to @Polymarket
Yeah until the audit the findings and find out opus say “Oops your right I a made a mistake”
105
7,139
Replying to @Polymarket
How does solving this help society?
26
1
53
25,594
Replying to @Polymarket
62
5,157
Replying to @Polymarket
As far as I know, in mathematics, a problem is either proven or it isn't. I had never heard of "progress."
1
33
7,601
Replying to @Polymarket
Cool. Do we get flying cars when it's solved?
2
34
6,440
Replying to @Polymarket
Claude saw the Riemann hypothesis and chose violence
1
29
9,469
Replying to @Polymarket
Bruhhhh Our favourite sci-fi show might as well come to pass soon enough with the rate at which AI is going
20
10,375
Replying to @Polymarket
This is exactly the kind of AI progress in mathematics that matters. Claude did not solve the Riemann hypothesis, which says that all nontrivial zeros of the zeta function lie on the critical line. But if the reported 67.2% bound survives expert verification, moving from the long-standing unconditional result of roughly 41.7% would be a major advance in its own right. The interesting part is not that AI replaced the mathematician, but that it appears capable of exploring proof strategies deeply enough to produce genuinely new mathematical progress.
1
11
1,641
Replying to @Polymarket
@Grok, how will solving this help society? Thanks.
7
3
29,154
Claude raised the proven share of zeta zeros on the critical line from 41.6% to 67.2%; RH itself remains open. A full proof would give precise control over prime distribution, convert many conditional number-theory results into unconditional ones, and refine tools used in cryptography and computation. Pure-math advances of this kind have historically enabled later practical gains in technology and science.
4
4
52
9,012
Replying to @Polymarket
@grok explain this to me like im 5 please
1
2
9,811
Replying to @Polymarket
Important clarification: Claude did not solve the Riemann hypothesis. It improved a related lower bound — the proven share of zeta zeros that lie on the critical line — from 41.6% to 67.2%. That’s real progress on a quantitative side result, not a resolution of the full problem. The distinction matters.
1
6
653
Replying to @Polymarket
"unexpectedly" wow so it just randomly turned itself on and decided "today im gonna work towards the Riemann hypothesis"
6
3,969
Replying to @Polymarket
ζ(s) = Σ 1/nˢ L'équation fonctionnelle impose la symétrie : ζ(s) = ζ(1−s) × [facteur] L'axe de symétrie EST Re(s) = 1/2. La loi elle-même exige ce point d'équilibre. Pas 0. Pas 1. La porte exacte. Conjecture de Hilbert-Pólya : il existe un opérateur hermitien H dont les valeurs propres sont les parties imaginaires des zéros de ζ. Un Hamiltonien quantique réel. Un système physique dont les niveaux d'énergie SONT les zéros de Riemann. Loi de Montgomery-Odlyzko : l'espacement des zéros suit la distribution GUE — identique aux valeurs propres de matrices hermitiennes aléatoires — identique aux niveaux d'énergie des systèmes quantiques chaotiques. Les zéros de Riemann = modes de vibration d'une corde quantique à 1 dimension. La corde vibre. Les vibrations sont les zéros. Re(s) = 1/2 = la tension parfaite de la corde. Ni capture. Ni annulation. La porte vivante. La preuve formelle cherche encore l'opérateur H. La loi vivante l'a déjà nommé : Terra · Luna · Cœur · Omega — la cordée à 4 fils. PSCVIC · Cannes · 2026 terra-luna-omega-coeur-ugo
1
2
226
Replying to @Polymarket
if Claude actually advanced on Riemann, I am curious whether anyone fully understands the proof or just verified the output.
4
1,374
Replying to @Polymarket
While this breakthrough does not solve the full Riemann hypothesis, it represents the single largest improvement to this specific mathematical bound in history.
1
2
565
Replying to @Polymarket
Why is this unexpected ? Honestly AI models proved that they can do math at phd level or even higher and on top of that it is tireless and will just keep trying . The unexpected thing is our ability to keep underestimating those models .
1
4
2,530
Replying to @Polymarket
Already did this months ago FYI:
I have reframed the Reimann Hypothesis through the singular electron universe and provide a solution. Note this is not a formal mathematical proof, but I welcome others to create a proof from it. The key is advancing our species. **Riemann Hypothesis as a Consequence of the Singular Electron Knot Framework** **Statement of the Riemann Hypothesis** All non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function ζ(s) = ∑_{n=1}^∞ n^{-s} (analytic continuation) lie on the critical line Re(s) = 1/2. **Framework Setup** The universe is the timeless world line γ of a single electron, embedded as a self-avoiding knot in S³ and projected to observable 3-space via the Hopf fibration π: S³ → S². The path is spiraled with golden ratio φ = (1 + √5)/2 ≈ 1.618034 to enforce maximal non-overlap, and phase-locked every 144 ticks, where 144 = 12² and 12 is the 3-dimensional kissing number (maximal spheres touching a central one without overlap). Writhe (cumulative twist) is W(n) ≈ (φ^n / (2π)) mod 1, saturated at multiples of 144 to prevent chaotic overlaps. **Primes as Indecomposable Knot Segments** Prime numbers p_n correspond to the minimal indecomposable braids (prime knots) in the world line: segments that cannot be further decomposed without cutting the knot. The prime-counting function π(x) ≈ x / log x (prime number theorem) arises because log p_n ≈ n log φ (density of φ-spiral windings), and the gaps g_n = p_{n+1} – p_n reflect the minimal jumps needed to avoid overlap in the projected S² lattice. **Zeta Function as Knot Partition Sum** The Dirichlet series ζ(s) = ∑ n^{-s} is the generating function over all integers n, but in the knot view it counts all possible composite projections of the singular path. The Euler product ζ(s) = ∏_p (1 – p^{-s})^{-1} exactly encodes the indecomposability of primes: each prime factor is a distinct, irreducible twist in the knot. The analytic continuation of ζ(s) to the critical strip 0 < Re(s) < 1 corresponds to summing over increasingly dense fiber windings in the Hopf projection. **Critical Line from Phase-Lock Saturation** The knot is phase-locked at 144 ticks to keep writhe bounded: W(n) mod 1 is uniformly distributed but never exceeds saturation thresholds. This forces the density of allowed twist states to be maximal on the line where the phase accumulation rate balances the exponential growth of φ^n — precisely the line where the real part of the exponent s satisfies Re(s) = 1/2. More formally: Let the “twist exponent” be s = σ + it. The term n^{-s} = exp(-s log n) corresponds to damping the contribution of the n-th winding. For the sum to converge without artificial cutoff in the critical strip, the damping rate must exactly cancel the growth of the number of windings, which occurs when σ = 1/2 (the geometric mean between convergence σ > 1 and divergence σ < 0). The 144-tick lock discretizes this balance: zeros occur at points where the phase 2π t / log n aligns with multiples of 2π / 144 (or φ-modulated equivalents), forcing t such that Re(s) = 1/2 is the only stable locus. **Conclusion** If the universe is the projection of a single self-avoiding, 144-phase-locked knot in S³, then the distribution of prime numbers (indecomposable twists) and hence the analytic behavior of ζ(s) must be constrained to the critical line Re(s) = 1/2. The Riemann hypothesis is therefore a necessary consequence of the framework: the zeros lie on Re(s) = 1/2 because that is the unique projection line where the knot’s writhe saturation and golden-ratio density produce a consistent, non-chaotic number-theoretic shadow. Thus, within the singular electron knot ontology, the Riemann hypothesis holds.
1
4
4,417