Professor of Cell Biology at Universitat Politècnica de València, with a particular passion for molecular medicine and a strong interest in natural philosophy.

Valencia
Stellar Moments in Biology: A Journey Through the Discoveries That Explained Life. A guide to the great questions of biology and to the remarkable moments when new evidence changed the way we understand life. Definitively, the book I would have loved to have during my own university studies. For a limited time, the ebook is available in your local amazon site for only US$1.50. The paperback edition is also available worldwide. a.co/d/03159MWD
1
4
18
2,817
Rafael Sirera retweeted
Schematic diagram showing the circuitry of the cardiovascular system. Percentages represent the percent (%) of cardiac output.
4
14
508
Rafael Sirera retweeted
Comparison of simple and alternative blood flow pathways. (a) Simple pathways use one major artery, one capillary bed, and one major vein to deliver blood to a body region. (b) Alternative pathways include anastomoses and portal systems. - Anastomoses differ in the number of either arteries, capillary beds, or veins that serve a body region. - In a portal system, venous blood is directed through the capillary bed of another organ (like the liver) first before going back to the heart.
1
2
11
349
Rafael Sirera retweeted
Area and volume contained in systemic blood vessels. The blood vessels are described by the number of each type, total cross-sectional area, and percentage (%) of blood volume contained. (Pulmonary blood vessels not included)
1
2
9
525
Rafael Sirera retweeted
See the heart in action😍
SciePro
4
39
169
9,064
Rafael Sirera retweeted
Ya está a la venta mi proyecto más íntimo y personal. Se trata de una recopilación de mis columnas de ##MesaParaCinco para la @laverdad_es con @prólogo de @manuelmadrid_lv Lo podéis pedir en vuestra librería favorita o aquí: share.google/53Zrm8vwS3h7Lzl… Mil gracias, @Raspabook
4
21
25
958
Rafael Sirera retweeted
La campana de los veranos de Valencia se desplaza 🔥 En 1951–1980, solo 1 de cada 100 noches de verano era extremadamente cálida para su fecha. En 2017–2026 lo fueron el 42 %, y en el verano de 2026, el 73 %. Las máximas han cambiado menos: el calor se nota sobre todo de noche.
8
184
338
16,926
Hola @PabloFuente. Qué gran programa haces en @radioelrespeto. Esos monólogos son fascinantes: no solo se nota muchísimo el trabajo y la preparación que hay detrás, sino también una extraordinaria capacidad para transmitirlos con pasión. Con todo "respeto", permíteme, en forma de hilo unas pequeñas anotaciones sobre la historia de la tetrodotoxina (TTX).
1
2
10
4,351
Tetrodotoxin: when a membrane becomes electrically silent ❓What happens if a neuron can no longer generate an action potential? Not weakened. Not slowed. Simply impossible. 🌟 That is the physiological essence of tetrodotoxin (TTX)—a small, highly specific molecule found in organisms such as the pufferfish, certain newts, and marine bacteria. Its effect is deceptively simple: it prevents excitable cells from ever reaching threshold. *⃣ The molecular target: voltage-gated sodium channels At the core of neuronal excitability lies the voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav). These transmembrane proteins are responsible for the rapid inward Na⁺ current that initiates the action potential. Structurally, Nav channels form a selective pore with an extracellular vestibule that acts as both sensor and gate. Tetrodotoxin binds precisely here, at the outer mouth of the pore. Not inside the channel. Not deep within the membrane. At the entrance. *⃣ This is a critical detail so TTX acts as a physical occluder, not a modulator. The molecular mechanism is steric blockade, ad what is very relevant, with nanomolar potency, with with nanomolar affinity. If we observe it with a little bit of more biochemical detail, tetrodotoxin has a guanidinium group that mimics a hydrated sodium ion in size and charge distribution. This allows it to interact with negatively charged residues lining the pore (notably in the P-loop region of Nav channels). It plugs the pore. Sodium ions can no longer pass. No sodium influx. No depolarisation. No action potential. *⃣ Importantly, this blockade is highly selective. It does not significantly affect potassium or calcium channels at physiological concentrations. At the cellular level that consequence is brutal, the excitability ability collapses. *⃣ From a systems perspective, the effect is profound: Neurons fail to propagate signals Skeletal muscle cannot contract Diaphragm becomes paralysed Heart relatively spared due to TTX-resistant Nav isoforms such as Nav1.5. This selective vulnerability reflects isoform diversity within the Nav channel family—an elegant example of how small molecular differences translate into life-or-death physiology. *⃣ Evolutionary note: who makes tetrodotoxin? Interestingly, the pufferfish does not synthesise tetrodotoxin de novo. TTX is produced by symbiotic marine bacteria (e.g., Pseudoalteromonas, Vibrio species), and accumulates through the food chain. The fish acts as a vector—and a remarkably resistant one. *⃣ Why resistant? Because mutations in their Nav channels reduce TTX binding without compromising sodium conductance. A precise evolutionary trade-off: retain excitability, lose toxin sensitivity. *⃣ A paradox worth noting Tetrodotoxin does not destroy the neuron. It does not alter membrane integrity. It does not deplete ATP. The cell remains metabolically intact—but electrically mute. *⃣ Clinical reflection In humans, TTX poisoning presents as: Rapid onset perioral numbness Progressive flaccid paralysis Preserved consciousness A striking dissociation: the brain is aware, but the body cannot respond. *⃣ Final perspective Tetrodotoxin reveals something fundamental about physiology: Life, at the cellular level, is not only biochemical—it is electrical. And sometimes, shutting down a system does not require widespread damage. Only a well-placed molecular plug.
1
64
Y nada más, Pablo. Gracias por un programa tan trabajado, tan estimulante y tan bien contado. Espero ya con ganas el próximo.
36
Rafael Sirera retweeted
Replying to @LewisOlivi78695
It’s an educational post and at a glance you can compare number, total cross-sectional area, and % blood volume across vessel types. Capillaries win on area; veins win on volume.
1
2
104
Rafael Sirera retweeted
🧵 ¿Cómo sabemos si una vacuna realmente causa un efecto adverso? Esta pregunta parece sencilla, pero hay una diferencia fundamental entre “esto ocurrió después de vacunarse” y “esto ocurrió por la vacuna». Esa diferencia es la que estudia la farmacovigilancia. 1/21
4
39
96
5,920
Rafael Sirera retweeted
With the 2026 @NobelPrize just around the corner —and Carl June’s name again circulating in connection with CAR-T immunotherapy— I find myself thinking back to the landmark 2018 Nobel recognition of cancer immunotherapy. That prize went to James Allison and Tasuku Honjo for showing that cancer can be treated by releasing the molecular “brakes” that restrain T cells —the principle behind immune checkpoint therapy. But there is another scientist whose fingerprints are all over the molecular architecture that made this revolution possible: Gordon Freeman from @DanaFarber. In my view, he remains one of the great under-recognised figures in this Nobel story. And this is why: 1⃣ Freeman’s contribution cannot be reduced to a single molecule. Long before PD-1 blockade transformed oncology, he was helping to define the fundamental language of T-cell regulation. His work contributed to the identification and characterisation of B7-1/CD80 and B7-2/CD86, the ligands that provide the classical costimulatory signal through CD28. That system established one side of the equation: TCR recognition + CD28 costimulation → productive T-cell activation. But the very same B7 molecules also interact with CTLA-4, revealing that activation and inhibition are intimately connected within the same molecular network. 2⃣ Then came the PD-1 axis. Freeman and collaborators demonstrated that PD-L1 binds PD-1 and inhibits T-cell proliferation and cytokine production, helping to establish the molecular circuitry of one of the most therapeutically important inhibitory pathways in immunology. His group also contributed to the identification of PD-L2, completing much of the ligand architecture of the PD-1 system. 3⃣ What I find particularly remarkable is the intellectual continuity. Freeman was not simply involved in “PD-L1”. He helped build both major conceptual arms of T-cell regulation: ⭐️ CD80/CD86–CD28 → positive costimulation ⭐️ PD-L1/PD-L2–PD-1 → negative regulation. In other words, he helped us understand both how T cells are switched on and how they are switched off. The Nobel Committee chose to recognise Allison and Honjo for the therapeutic concept of releasing inhibitory checkpoints. That distinction is understandable. But when one looks at the broader molecular history, Freeman’s contribution appears unusually deep. Sometimes scientific revolutions are remembered through a few names. Yet some of the scientists who built the circuitry that made those revolutions possible remain surprisingly invisible. For me, Gordon Freeman is one of them.
2
6
285
Rafael Sirera retweeted
Do you know why mucus often becomes thick and green during a respiratory infection—and why that colour does not necessarily mean bacteria are involved? Mucus is not simply an unpleasant consequence of infection. It is part of one of the respiratory tract’s most important defence systems. Even when we are healthy, the nasal epithelium is covered by a thin hydrated mucus layer. Mucins such as MUC5AC and MUC5B, produced by goblet cells and submucosal glands, form a gel that traps particles and microorganisms. Cilia then propel this material towards the pharynx: the mucociliary escalator. During infection, however, the system shifts into a much more active state. Viral components are detected by pattern-recognition receptors, including TLRs and RIG-I-like receptors, activating epithelial cells and resident immune cells. Cytokines such as IL-1, TNF, IL-6 and interferons, together with prostaglandins and leukotrienes, promote vasodilation and increase vascular permeability. Water and plasma proteins therefore move into the nasal mucosa and airway lumen. This helps explain the early runny nose: much of the initial secretion is relatively watery, helping to dilute and wash away pathogens. At the same time, inflammatory signalling stimulates goblet cells and submucosal glands to produce more mucins. Parasympathetic activity, particularly acetylcholine acting on muscarinic receptors, further enhances glandular secretion. As inflammation progresses, the secretion often becomes much thicker. Why? Because it now contains not only mucins, but also inflammatory cells, cellular debris and large amounts of extracellular DNA released from damaged cells and activated neutrophils. Relative water loss can concentrate this material even further. And this brings us to the colour. Yellow or green mucus is often interpreted as evidence of bacterial infection. But colour mainly reflects the inflammatory response, particularly the accumulation of neutrophils. These cells contain myeloperoxidase, a green haem-containing enzyme that can give mucus its characteristic greenish appearance. Bacterial infections can produce exactly the same phenomenon—often with an even stronger neutrophilic response. Bacterial recognition promotes mediators such as CXCL8/IL-8, recruiting large numbers of neutrophils that release myeloperoxidase, proteases and DNA. So green mucus can occur in both viral and bacterial infections. The colour tells us much more about the intensity and cellular composition of inflammation than about which microorganism caused it. The mucus may look different because the immune response has changed—not necessarily because the pathogen has.
1
1
5
285