ALT Constrained decoding can enforce regular or context-free output formats, but many program-generation failures are semantic: scope, typing, and declaration effects depend on context. We present semantic grammar specifications, a declarative formalism that attaches such constraints to a context-free surface and executes them during Earley descent. Our implementation enforces safe pruning: it rejects only prefixes whose semantic contradictions cannot be repaired by any continuation. A separate, grammar-dependent, dead-end freedom property guarantees the existence of a realizable witness for each remaining branch. We give simple sufficient conditions based on surface productivity, type coverage, and left-to-right constraint flow. Our finite-lambda, core ML, and C-like fragments satisfy them, while the STLC instance used in our experiments does not: plain STLC can violate type coverage, and we show how restricting its type universe recovers it. A tokenizer-lifting lemma carries character-le

ALT We prove that the state space of every well-formed session type, quotiented by strongly connected components, forms a bounded lattice; n-ary parallel composition yields product lattices. Two consequences follow: duality preserves the lattice up to isomorphism, and Gay-Hole width subtyping corresponds to lattice embedding for non-recursive types. We validate this on 108 benchmark protocols across networking, databases, distributed systems, AI, and fault tolerance: all form lattices, 93 distributive, 15 non-distributive. Mechanised in Lean 4 with two independently developed tool implementations.

ALT Lock-free synchronisation algorithms are often implemented with fallible operations, such as compare-and-swap (CAS), wrapped in unbounded retry loops. Verifying such algorithms requires considering arbitrarily many failing iterations, yielding large state spaces, compounded by the interleavings of concurrent threads. Prior work discarded failing iterations, arguing that they leave no trace in the post-loop state. Compilers and hardware reorder instructions, and load-store reorderings may cross the boundaries of failing iterations, introducing subtle concurrency bugs. We demonstrate one such bug, making use-after-free possible in a previously verified variant of Read-Copy-Update - a synchronisation primitive widely adopted in the Linux Kernel - and we provide and verify a fix. We find that practical retries in lock-free algorithms adhere to a common pattern. We introduce episodic loops, a semantic characterisation of unbounded retry loops which is syntactically recognisable in many prac

ALT Neural decompilers are machine learning models which perform the process of decompilation, lifting code from a lower-level language to a higher one. Neural decompilers offer substantial utility relative to traditional deterministic decompilers because they can probabilistically recover information discarded during lowering, like variable names, types, and control flow structuring. However, they can also make mistakes, producing code that is not equivalent to the original, making it difficult to trust their output. In this work, we introduce Faultless, a program equivalence technique for performing translation validation on neural decompilers. Faultless compares code produced by a deterministic decompiler, which has stronger correctness properties, with that of a neural decompiler. Faultless is also useful for model evaluation, a highly related task, in which the neural decompilers' prediction is compared with a reference solution. Neural decompilation introduces significant challenges

ALT The coroutine has broadly diffused in the practice of concurrent programming in the form of generators and asynchronous functions as well as processes communicating through pipes. We wanted to use coroutines in Python to create single-threaded Unix-style pipelines. Unfortunately, available solutions in Python are cumbersome to use. The JavaScript push-stream protocol appeared to be a good alternative. However, its specification is incomplete and ambiguous. We have used TLA⁺ and the TLC model checker to re-derive the protocol and obtain protocol-specific verification tools. In this paper, we present a formal specification of a push-stream protocol that 1) seamlessly combines synchronous and asynchronous modules, encapsulating the choice within each module; 2) provides flow control without using bounded buffers; 3) gracefully and unambiguously terminates; 4) does not require dynamic allocation of objects on the heap. In addition to completely describing expected behaviours, our specifica

ALT Modern cloud applications are built from loosely-coupled microservices that coordinate through well-defined APIs to service user requests. A single API request often triggers multiple downstream API calls, some executed sequentially and others spawned asynchronously in parallel. To certify safe and secure inter-service interactions in such applications, security and compliance teams must enforce policies not only over nested call/return structure, but also over the parallel structure of an execution: which calls may run concurrently, how many parallel branches can be spawned, and what combination of branch outcomes are allowed. However, existing runtime enforcement mechanisms typically model executions as sequential or purely nested traces, and cannot capture the parallel structure introduced by asynchronous API calls. Furthermore, since application implementations may not be accessible to security and compliance teams, the policy enforcement mechanism should be decoupled from the serv

ALT Real-world programs are rarely written in a single language: For example, C programs call assembly routines, and high-level languages like OCaml link with low-level C libraries. Yet program logics—one of the most successful techniques for modular program verification—almost exclusively target single-language programs. We present Hotpot, the first framework for building multi-language program logics. Hotpot enables compilation-independent, cross-language reasoning about languages with heterogeneous views of shared state. Hotpot rests on four key ideas: abstract calls to specify calls to unknown functions, lanes and the switching modality to move between languages inside the program logic, uniform integration of refinement reasoning via lanes, and exchanges to translate between separation logic assertions of different languages. We demonstrate that Hotpot allows reusing specifications across implementations in different languages, supports reasoning about higher-order cross-language func

ALT AI agents increasingly resemble software systems: they call tools, remember facts, follow policies, delegate work, and take actions with real consequences. % Yet the “program” of an agent is scattered across prompts, tools, memories, workflows, and execution traces, making its behavior difficult to inspect through ordinary testing and debugging alone. % This essay argues that a programming-systems perspective offers a natural lens for making agents reliable. % We recast agents as programmable artifacts whose behavior can be specified over traces and state, checked before deployment, monitored during execution, and improved from observed failures. % The goal is not to make probabilistic agents behave like deterministic programs, but to give them enough structure that their behavior can be reasoned about, controlled, and repaired.

ALT Egraphs have enabled recent advances in program optimization, synthesis, and verification, yet remain difficult to apply to effectful programs whose memory and I/O operations must respect execution order. Existing effect-aware extraction algorithms rely on integer linear programming (ILP) and dominate total runtime. We introduce Statewalk DP, a new extraction algorithm that enforces effect ordering efficiently without external solvers. We prove that finding any effect-safe extraction is NP-complete, but show that Statewalk DP is tractable in statewalk width, a parameter that measures the complexity of dataflow interactions among effects. In practice, statewalk width generally remains small, enabling Statewalk DP to achieve order-of-magnitude speedups over ILP extraction while producing programs comparable to LLVM across our benchmarks. We implement the algorithm in eqcc, a prototype egraph-based compiler for imperative Bril programs and demonstrate that effect-aware extraction is no lo

ALT To meet the performance needs of modern machine learning (ML) applications, ML compiler frameworks support compiler-to-accelerator mappings that offload parts of application code to operations in specialized hardware accelerators. However, most of these frameworks do not verify these mappings down to the hardware level, potentially resulting in functional mismatches. In this paper we propose BOLT, the first framework for formally verifying the correctness of compiler-to-accelerator mappings for coarse-grained intrinsics in ML accelerators, with respect to a formal hardware semantics. BOLT does not require additional information from the compiler, and verifies the functional equivalence of the application code and the code for the mapped hardware accelerator intrinsic, including handling of complex loop nests and tensor data layouts in hardware. It effectively utilizes a pattern of aligning software loops with the hardware, followed by relating corresponding data layouts, to enable veri

ALT Many cloud-based applications are organized as loosely coupled microservices, where invoking a service's API triggers a cascade of APIs across many services and leads to inter-service exchange of API parameters and output responses. Current tools for monitoring microservice safety properties have limited expressiveness for properties that describe the flow of data through API calls. To this end, we present SafeNom, a specification and monitoring framework for microservices based on nominal languages. SafeNom policies can express both the desired order of API calls and how the data carried in requests and responses should or should not flow between the APIs. Policies are enforced using a nominal automaton-based distributed runtime monitor which can be applied in a blackbox and non-invasive manner, without access to the service implementation and without making changes to the service implementation. Our experiments show that our monitor can efficiently enforce rich data-aware properties

ALT We introduce Forte, a sensitivity type system for Rust whose soundness rests on ownership. The graded sensitivity type systems, from Fuzz's linear grading to Solo's environment indices, are pure calculi: a claim about a value holds for the value's whole lifetime because nothing can mutate it. The imperative sensitivity analyses admit assignment to first-order variables and no references, so no question of aliasing arises in them. The programs that compute differentially private statistics in deployment are Rust, and they mutate through borrows. Forte closes this gap. Its central rules strongly update a sensitivity environment through an exclusive borrow, at a primitive call and across a checked function boundary; its soundness theorem is metric preservation over an operational semantics with a store, in which the exclusivity of &mut alone licenses framing across a mutating call, and two aliased borrows suffice to refute the theorem without it. Verus mechanizes the theorem, the function

ALT This technical report accompanies our EuroSys 2027 paper "Lifting the Preprocessor with Oxidize: Structure-Preserving C-to-Rust Translation" (DOI 10.1145/3842654.3848533). Oxidize is a C-to-Rust translator that retains C macros as Rust macros instead of expanding them away, so that the translated code keeps the abstractions its developers wrote. The report collects material the paper cites but has no room for: the translator's intermediate representation, pass structure and back-end emission; the details of macro typing through helper traits and the generic cast macro; the sources and pinned revisions of the nine evaluated C codebases; the per-codebase macro population and how macros are attributed to classes; a roadmap from structure-preserving translation toward safe Rust; the performance overhead study and its methodology; and the configuration and prompt used for the LLM-based baselines.

ALT Formal verification tools commonly rely on SMT solvers to automatically reason about programs, leveraging a range of logical theories, e.g., linear integer arithmetic, arrays, or strings, to encode program constructs and verification conditions. Despite recent advances, such solvers still struggle when reasoning about recursive data structures such as lists, which are pervasive in modern functional languages. Additionally, lists are commonly used in conjunction with higher-order combinators to, e.g., generically apply a function to all elements of the list. In this work, we provide first-class support for reasoning about lists within SMT solvers. We focus on lists of arbitrary size that, following the map-reduce paradigm, can be manipulated exclusively through a set of abstract combinators. To this end, we introduce DueList, an abstraction-refinement approach geared towards list reasoning, which we implement on top of off-the-shelf SMT solvers. To evaluate the efficiency of our approac

ALT Existing formal mathematics benchmarks, such as miniF2F, ProofNet, and PutnamBench, primarily evaluate models on constructing complete formal proofs for challenging problems. Because success is measured at the theorem level, these benchmarks offer limited insight into models' step-level formal reasoning. Evaluating this capability separately enables finer-grained diagnosis of model limitations than theorem-level evaluation alone. To fill this evaluation gap, we introduce ProofGap, a fine-grained benchmark for step-level formal reasoning. ProofGap is constructed through a natural-language proof-processing pipeline that decomposes each reasoning step into one or more aligned proof gaps. Applying this pipeline to natural-language solutions to 3,015 exercises in B. P. Demidovich's Problems in Mathematical Analysis yields 26,116 gaps. The benchmark focuses on mathematical analysis, a domain that remains challenging for current models. By supplying the local context and target explicitly, ga

ALT Modern AI and HPC accelerators increasingly expose dataflow features: software-visible mechanisms for data movement and overlap, such as inter-core communication through the on-chip network and intra-core asynchronous pipelining. These features shift scheduling responsibility from hardware to the compiler, and because placement, movement, and synchronization become software-visible, they also make the performance of static schedules predictable. Yet high performance on such hardware still relies on vendor-engineered kernel libraries or profile-based auto-tuning, whose embedded expert knowledge transfers poorly across architectures and algorithms. We present Loom, a tuning-free symbolic compiler framework for tile-based SPMD programs on spatial dataflow architectures. The central idea is to treat tile-based SPMD compilation as a hardware-explicit static optimization problem. Loom enumerates discrete spatial-mapping and communication candidates while keeping value parameters, such as til

ALT Variadic generics are a powerful tool for type-safe meta-programming. Yet in most widely used languages, they remain an "expert-only" feature due to their reliance on complex patterns such as recursive decomposition or expansion expressions that do not compose naturally with ordinary control flow. In C++, for example, accessing elements of parameter packs has traditionally relied on unintuitive recursive patterns that "peel off" elements. This paper presents Pack Iteration, a feature introduced in Swift 6.0 that allows developers to iterate over parameter packs using a familiar, imperative for-in loop. By treating pack expansion as a first-class source for iteration, Swift bridges the gap between high-level expressiveness and advanced generic programming. We detail the design and implementation of this feature within the Swift compiler, focusing on the challenges of bridging static type-checking in the constraint system with dynamic execution in the Swift Intermediate Language. Unlike

ALT Distributed systems are hard to implement correctly, and subtle bugs can go undetected using traditional testing. Formal verification offers an alternative for proving the correctness of complex distributed systems. Despite previous efforts to automate and facilitate formal verification, it is still hard to integrate formal verification in software development. Programmers need to query the theorem prover repeatedly to find the correct proof of their system. This cycle of going back and forth with the theorem prover involves a lot of human intervention and is a barrier to adopting formal verification in software development. In this paper, we address the challenges of scaling formal verification in practice by reducing the human intervention required to find the correctness proof of a distributed system. We propose ProofSaX, an automated tool that shards large verification tasks and explores the proof search space for each shard independently to synthesize correctness proofs. We use co

ALT Inductive types are ubiquitous building blocks in many programming and theorem proving languages. An inductive type is a closed set of constructors from which values of the type can be created. That set cannot be extended though once a type is defined. This limits extensibility, reuse, and modular separation of concerns when defining types and functions operating over their values. This limitation is manifested in the expression problem, where extending an expression language with new syntactic constructors without having to modify or re-compile existing ones is a challenge in almost all programming languages. This paper presents inductive type and function implementation composition algorithms based on meta-programming. In addition, a set of syntactic extensions to the Lean proof assistant implementing those algorithms are presented. This framework allows for modular reuse, composition, and extension of a subset of Lean type and function definitions. In addition, semantic subtyping re

ALT As autonomous AI agents take on every stage of scientific inquiry, research output is expanding far beyond human review capacity. Yet scientific communication still relies on natural-language prose: an informal medium prone to ambiguity, hidden assumptions, and untracked limitations that machines cannot reliably audit. We introduce Lara, a machine-checkable language and protocol for checking and revising support for research claims. By turning research arguments into executable artifacts, Lara provides an epistemic kernel for autonomous science: it enables automated validation pipelines for research agents, lets declared bridges connect arguments across papers into an auditable network, and allows both humans and machines to recheck the standing of an encoded claim in milliseconds. In a Lara program, authors explicitly declare their claims, supporting evidence and assumptions, and known objections or limitations. A lightweight, deterministic checker adjudicates these interactions, assi