BSV = Utility. Powering the next generation of Metanet apps, protecting user privacy and unlocking new potential with micropayments.

Oregon, United States
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
We’ll be fine 🙃
1
1
40
i think we may actually be finding some common ground, even if we don't fully agree on everything, there's some good things we talked about on the space
34
so because moon blocked me, i can't reply to them anymore i respect the ElectrumSVP project and am not knocking its current approach especiallywith BREAD needless to say i reject the characterization and past tense framing but i'm not interested in making comparisons or claiming superiority in either direction cheers to you and i want to see the best of luck and good traction for your project as with all projects on #bsv genuine complements and olive branches to you and yours 🙏✝️
1
47
Replying to @_79b_
they never even worked for me to buy ever, just my own experience in oregon we need more easily to access ramps / markets #BSV market access matters for real-world utility and people who wanna check out useful apps that's our position on this.
38
Replying to @MehdiBensid
what country?
1
30
Babbage | BRC100 retweeted
Most systems choke long before they hit the volume a global food system needs. But a crisis of this scale, needs scale - from day one, not bolted on later. Big respect to the builders that show up with working products, not promises. Get behind them 👇
2
7
33
1,069
ok learn to move past ur trauma for the greater cause
31
one alternative idea ... a normie sees a cool app / experience where "micropayments" or "local bsv" or another thing like that ... then they can ramp to BSV via BSV-SOL bridge ? could that help them access the apps / systems which are using BSV for their onchain assets/tokens? 🤔
1
51
letting ppl ramp into useful applications built with brc100 could also be a power move 💪
1
19
lmao so u r saying we r S.O.L. shit outta luck 'nless we did the BSV-SOL 🤣 don't be afraid to look at things even if you catch some flack from ppl but u already know this my friend
1
47
I support people exploring this if they think it makes sense. I think it could be good for market access, bridging onramps and letting more people participate. #BSV market access matters.
1
1
49
literally any brc100 wallet that tried this bullshit would be deplatformed ... by its own users. They would all just leave, keep all their data (BRC39), and they would import everything of theirs into a new wallet that was less dumb, and keep using all their apps with THEIR keys.
Honestly if you build a Bitcoin wallet only to deactivate & geofence-off users in every country but one... why'd you even bother getting into Bitcoin in the first place?
4
12
1,570
hooligan, some relevant topics to think about if people are talking about brc100 considering they are closely associated with it
1
46
Replying to @liujackc
thanks for assembling a discussion - yours wallet - handcash - open source wallets - apps on metanetapps.com - brc39 cross-vendor recovery - hodos browser and bridget's impls - components, capabilities, standards and foundations "dead" definition? ☠️
2
8
498
Last time, on Metanet Meetup, we talked wallets and OS integrations! Huge thanks to Richard Hein for presenting his project, and thanks @braydenjlangley for getting this cool recp website built. See you THIS FRIDAY 10/2 for the next MetanetMeetup.com event! Bitcoin OS recap here: 👇 metanetmeetup.com/recaps/202…
1
4
403
Replying to @71Nous
Sir, These are people’s lives and livelihoods. In my opinion and this has tons of historical precedent…the switchless design you speak of is a myth. Someone will break it like the gold standard. You speak of math, 1:1 is a reserve ratio … that holds until just the very moment it becomes too politically inconvenient, too unpopular. For enough humans, a critical mass. Made to believe a lie for too long, that their “Justice” was less important than a cold, hard algorithm. History, my friend. History, and human behavior. We want the same things. The 1:1 ratio, it was a myth, people could deny that but next thing the president’s on TV and the mask comes off, it’s the same tired game again with new wine in old bottles. There is no switchless system. Now, do you want accountable power with documented constraints? The alternative is not “no power”. The alternative is foolishly pretending no power, then later, scrambling, frantically improvising, and ultimately submitting in fear … to an untamed power, one too long restrained and unacknowledged, accountable to no one, arbitrary, and capricious. DAO hack. Cronos/Tectonic. Harmony rollback. When losses become existential, human governance has a funny way of re-appearing at the helm anyway. I choose the former. I respect the other path, but it was never a world worth my time and energy. We’re all here working to the same goals. Let’s acknowledge human imperfections. Then let’s get back to work creating wallets, overlays, apps, and systems where human hands steer the ship of the world … Not cold, steely Terminator ones ;) The price of human freedom will ALWAYS be human vigilance, no system can ever change that. Anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is either uninformed, or a tyrant. Stay vigilant, my friend. I’m leaving this thread here, I have to get back to other things. Have a good week ahead!
1
3
180