The first PulseBitcoin book is a milestone for the community. Communities grow when their story reaches new people. This book has the potential to introduce PulseBitcoin and PulseChain to readers who may never have discovered them otherwise. Every Amazon review increases visibility and gives the book a better chance of reaching the next reader. If you believe PulseBitcoin deserves a larger audience, please consider leaving an honest review and helping spread the story. 📖 Amazon: amazon.com/dp/B0H5TKM63W #PulseBitcoin #PulseChain #PLSB

Shielded PulseBitcoin: How an Immutable Token Can Still Gain New Functions PulseBitcoin has one characteristic that may initially appear to be a technical limitation, but could also become a strength in the long term: the original PLSB smart contract is immutable. Its fundamental rules cannot simply be rewritten or expanded later. Neither the maximum supply nor the core mechanisms of PLSB can be changed at will. The foundation remains exactly as it was originally created. This raises an important question: How can PulseBitcoin continue to develop technically if the actual contract itself must remain unchanged? The answer is not to change PLSB itself, but to build additional systems around PLSB. This exact principle is currently also becoming interesting in the context of Bitcoin. Under the term “Shielded Bitcoin,” researchers are working on an approach designed to enable private Bitcoin transactions without fundamentally changing Bitcoin itself. The term “shielded” in this context means protected or concealed. It refers to certain information within a transaction no longer being publicly visible to everyone. This matters because public blockchains are by no means automatically anonymous. On Bitcoin, PulseChain, and many other blockchains, transactions can be publicly traced. It is possible to see which address sends value, which address receives it, and how much is transferred. The address itself does not contain a name, but once a wallet can be linked to a particular person or organization, its movements may be traceable over long periods of time. A shielded system attempts to reduce this level of transparency. A transaction can still be valid and verifiable by a network without requiring every detail to remain publicly visible. Depending on the technical implementation, information such as the sender, the recipient, the amount, or the connection to previous transactions can be concealed. This immediately raises another question: How can a network verify that a transaction is correct if important information is not publicly visible? This is where so-called Zero Knowledge Proofs come into play. The basic idea is to prove mathematically that a statement is true without revealing all of the underlying information required to establish that truth. In the context of cryptocurrencies, such a method can, for example, prove that a user actually has sufficient funds, that the same coins have not already been spent, and that all rules of the system are being followed. At the same time, it is not necessarily required to disclose all transaction details publicly. This is what makes such technology important. It creates the possibility of separating transparency from verifiability. A system can still verify whether its rules are being followed without every outside observer being able to see every economic detail of a transaction. For PulseBitcoin, this development is interesting not because the current Shielded Bitcoin concept could simply be copied. Bitcoin and PulseChain operate very differently on a technical level. What matters is the underlying principle: an existing base asset does not need to be changed in order for new functions to emerge. This idea is especially relevant to PulseBitcoin because the original PLSB contract is immutable. New functions therefore cannot be added directly to the existing contract. They would have to be created through additional smart contracts or independent protocols that use PLSB without changing its core. The Goldpool concept is already an example of exactly this type of architecture. The PLSB contract itself is not changed. Instead, an additional system is created that uses PLSB as its foundation and builds a new economic mechanism around it. The important distinction is therefore between the base asset and the infrastructure that can develop around it. PLSB itself remains unchanged. But that does not mean the entire PulseBitcoin ecosystem has to remain unchanged. A hypothetical Shielded PLSB system would follow the same basic principle. PLSB could be deposited into an additional privacy contract. Within that system, value could then be transferred in a way that no longer exposes every detail publicly. The underlying PLSB contract would not need to be changed. The additional system would simply use PLSB. In simplified terms, a user could deposit PLSB into a specialized smart contract. Within that contract, cryptographically protected positions or claims could then be created and transferred between users. A mathematical proof would confirm that every transaction complies with the rules. The original PLSB supply would remain unchanged. No new PLSB would necessarily need to be created. The additional protocol would simply form a new technical layer above the existing asset. This separation between an immutable core and expandable infrastructure could become particularly important for PulseBitcoin over the long term. The PLSB contract could be viewed as the base layer. Above it, different independent applications could emerge. The Goldpool concept is one possible application. A privacy system would be another. Beyond that, payment systems, vaults, trading mechanisms, or other DeFi applications could also be built. Not every one of these ideas will necessarily be useful or technically feasible. The key point, however, is that the future development of PulseBitcoin does not depend on being able to modify the original contract. This may even represent a strategic advantage. The core remains stable and predictable while innovation takes place outside that core. Developers do not need to keep trying to expand PLSB itself with new functions. Instead, they can create applications that build on top of PLSB. This reflects a fundamental principle found in many technical systems. A stable base layer is changed as little as possible, while new functions are developed in higher layers. This keeps the foundation reliable while allowing the applications built on top of it to evolve. For PulseBitcoin, this could eventually lead to a much broader structure. PLSB itself would remain the immutable base asset with its fixed properties, maximum supply, mining mechanism, and halvings. Around that asset, different protocols could emerge that create additional use cases. The Goldpool concept already demonstrates what such a model can look like. It does not change PLSB. It builds on PLSB. A Shielded PLSB system would serve a completely different technical purpose, but it would follow the same underlying principle. The current development around Shielded Bitcoin is therefore interesting for PulseBitcoin less as a direct technical blueprint and more as an example of a broader development in blockchain technology. Increasingly, the question is becoming: How can existing assets gain additional capabilities without changing their original rules? For PulseBitcoin, this question is especially relevant because the immutability of the contract is already fixed. The real opportunity therefore does not lie in rebuilding PulseBitcoin itself. It lies in creating new systems around PulseBitcoin. This also changes the way PLSB can be viewed. PulseBitcoin would not simply be a single token with a fixed set of functions. PLSB could instead be understood as a digital base asset on which additional applications are built. The original contract defines the rules of the asset. The ecosystem defines what can be done with that asset. That distinction could become extremely important over time. An immutable contract does not necessarily mean stagnation. It can also provide a stable foundation on which other developers and projects can build. The more useful systems that use PLSB, the greater the practical scope of the entire PulseBitcoin ecosystem can become, even though the core itself remains unchanged. Shielded Bitcoin currently illustrates this principle particularly well. The idea is not to completely redesign Bitcoin, but to create additional possibilities on top of an existing and largely unchanged foundation. For PulseBitcoin, this way of thinking could become increasingly important in the long term. PLSB does not need to change. The world around PLSB can change. #PulseBitcoin #PLSB #PulseChain #DeFi #Blockchain #Crypto #Bitcoin #ShieldedBitcoin #ZeroKnowledge #ZeroKnowledgeProofs #Privacy #SmartContracts #Web3 #Decentralization #CryptoInnovation #DigitalAssets #DeFiInfrastructure

PulseBitcoin - Art, Structure, and Flow - Week 39/2026 Today I visited the German Historical Museum in Berlin and saw two exhibitions there: “Objects. History. Stories. A Look into the Collection” and “Nature and German History. Faith, Biology, Power.” Both deal with German history, but in completely different ways. One tells history through concrete objects, while the other explores how people have understood nature over the centuries and used it for their own ideas. I found “Objects. History. Stories.” interesting simply because history there does not consist only of dates, rulers and political events. Instead, you stand in front of real things that people actually used, owned or made. That suddenly makes the past much more tangible. Sometimes an old object can tell you more about its time than several pages in a history book. What impressed me most was a large, richly decorated cabinet. It stands quite dominantly in the room and immediately draws your attention. I had a very simple thought: No matter how tiny an apartment may be, if a cabinet like that stands inside it, it is impressive. This piece of furniture does not need a palace around it. It has enough presence on its own to change an entire room. I found that remarkable because a cabinet is initially something completely ordinary. You store things inside it, close the doors and that is basically it. But at some point, someone decided to make much more out of it. The wood was worked, carved and decorated until an everyday object became something that, centuries later, stands in a museum and still impresses people. The original owner has long since disappeared. The cabinet is still there. That is exactly where I see one of the strengths of collections like this. History does not consist only of the major events everyone knows from school. It is also contained in furniture, clothing, tools, images and completely ordinary objects. Some of them were probably taken for granted in their own time. Only with enough distance do we recognize what they tell us about the people who made and used them. The second exhibition, “Nature and German History. Faith, Biology, Power,” takes a completely different approach. Here, the focus is less on the individual object and more on one big question: What do people actually mean by nature? At first, that sounds simple. Nature is simply nature. But the exhibition shows that people have given this concept very different meanings over the centuries. Religion, science, agriculture, ideas about the human body and later political ideologies all played a role. What was considered natural in one era could already be viewed completely differently in another. That is precisely what makes the subject interesting. People do not simply observe nature. They explain it, categorize it and sometimes even use their ideas about it to justify social or political decisions. As a result, an exhibition about nature suddenly also tells you something about religion, science and power. The two exhibitions therefore work surprisingly well next to each other. On one side are concrete objects that have survived history. On the other are ideas and concepts that keep changing throughout history. And at some point, my thoughts returned to PulseBitcoin. The large cabinet gave me a very simple idea: Size alone does not determine whether something makes an impression. An apartment may be small and unremarkable. But place an extraordinary object inside it, and the entire room changes. It is similar with a project. It does not have to be the biggest in order to have a strong identity. What matters is what is actually inside it. That is exactly what fascinates me about PulseBitcoin. Behind the name is a clear structure: 21 million, mining, halvings and smart contract. PulseBitcoin is Bitcoin as a smart contract on PulseChain. Added to that are history, people and a community that develops over time. Perhaps that is even the connection between a centuries-old cabinet and a digital project: An impression is not created by size alone. Sometimes all it takes is something with a strong structure of its own, and suddenly the entire space feels different. Today I went into a history museum, and of all things, it was a cabinet that stayed with me most. History apparently sometimes finds rather unusual ways to leave an impression. That inspired me to create the following graphic. #GermanHistoricalMuseum #Berlin #GermanHistory #Museum #History #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB

Crypto Market Report - Week 38/2026 Actually, Bitcoin should be under pressure. But that is exactly what is not happening so far. The oil price is now above $100. At the same time, problems are intensifying along important energy routes in the Middle East. The costs of transporting crude oil are rising massively. On the route from Saudi Arabia to China, the daily freight earnings of large oil tankers are now above one million dollars. A year ago, they were below $100,000. This means that geopolitical risk is increasingly becoming a real cost factor for the global economy. Rising energy and transportation costs increase inflationary pressure. At the same time, yields in the bond market continue to rise. This is exactly the problematic combination we described last week. The Federal Reserve has now raised the key interest rate by another 25 basis points. Normally, this would not be a good environment for Bitcoin. Higher interest rates make capital more expensive and drain liquidity from speculative markets. But this time, Bitcoin is reacting differently. After the rate hike, the price was able to recover and is back above $80,000. Gold also moved higher. That is remarkable because the market is simultaneously dealing with an oil price shock, rising bond yields, high inflation, and still restrictive monetary policy. Bitcoin is therefore currently showing relative strength. However, this does not automatically mean that all risks are gone. If the energy price shock pushes inflation even higher and bond yields rise significantly, Bitcoin could also come under pressure again. The key point is therefore not only that Bitcoin has risen above $80,000. What matters is whether the price can also defend this level under persistently difficult conditions. At the same time, the familiar long-term problem is intensifying: Rising yields increase governments’ debt-servicing costs. The longer this environment persists, the greater the pressure on central banks to eventually intervene again to stabilize markets. For altcoins, the situation therefore remains riskier. If Bitcoin corrects, smaller cryptocurrencies would usually react more strongly. The same applies to PulseChain. For PulseBitcoin, the comparison with WPLS remains particularly important. If PLSB loses less than WPLS even in a difficult market environment or recovers faster, that would once again be a sign of relative strength. The most important observation this week is therefore simple: Bitcoin is receiving bad news from several directions and still is not falling sustainably. If this resilience continues, it would be a much stronger signal than a price increase in an already favorable market environment. #CryptoMarketReport #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #Oil #Inflation #InterestRates #FederalReserve #Bonds #Liquidity #Altcoins #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB #WPLS

PulseBitcoin - Art, Structure, and Flow - Week 38/2026 Today I visited the exhibition “Metaxy: Between Destruction and Reconstruction” at the Akademie der Künste on Hanseatenweg. The title already describes quite precisely what it is about. “Metaxy” means “between.” It refers to that state after something has been destroyed, but before it has been decided what should come next. At the exhibition, it felt to me like a mixture of art, architecture and political documentation. Photographs, plans, models, films and artistic works stand side by side. The exhibition is not only about destroyed buildings or cities, but also about memory, loss and the question of what can actually be restored after destruction. Reconstruction initially sounds simple: Something was there, it was destroyed, so you rebuild it. But of course it is not that simple. Should the new version look as much as possible like the old one? Should only certain elements be preserved? Or should the opportunity be used to create something completely new? That was exactly the question I found interesting about the exhibition. A building, after all, does not consist only of walls, windows and a roof. People connect memories with it, certain spaces have a function and some things become part of a place’s identity over the years. So when something is rebuilt, you first have to decide what from the old is actually worth preserving. It is particularly fitting that the building of the Akademie itself becomes part of this idea. The present Akademie on Hanseatenweg was created after the Second World War. In the exhibition, the earlier development of the site is made visible again. So you find yourself in a new building while at the same time being reminded that something else existed in the same place before. Berlin is a suitable place for this subject anyway. Large parts of the city were destroyed during the war and later rebuilt in very different ways. Some buildings were reconstructed, others were completely replaced, and in many places something emerged that had very little to do with what had been there before. Even today, people can still debate which of those decisions worked and which did not. Exactly this question is currently occupying us as we consider a new PulseBitcoin website: What should be carried over from the existing site? What belongs to the identity of PulseBitcoin? Which content still works? And which things should not be kept simply because they have always been there? In my view, a new website should neither simply become a copy of the old one nor throw everything that already exists overboard. Both would be too easy. The more interesting question is which elements are truly important and which are only there because they happened to develop that way at some point. The history of PulseBitcoin belongs there. The fundamental idea belongs there. The clear structure belongs there: 21 million, mining, halvings and smart contract. PulseBitcoin is Bitcoin as a smart contract on PulseChain. But the way this content is presented can be completely rethought. Navigation, design, structure and visual language do not have to be preserved simply because they were once created that way. You can preserve an existing identity while still creating a new environment for it. Perhaps that is the most interesting thought I took away from “Metaxy”: Reconstruction means neither copying everything old nor removing everything old. The real art lies in recognizing what should remain and what should be allowed to emerge anew. And that is exactly the decision that will ultimately shape what the next PulseBitcoin website will look like. That inspired me to create the following graphic. #Metaxy #AkademiederKünste #BerlinArt #Architecture #Design #WebDesign #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB

Crypto Market Report - Week 37/2026 The markets are facing a new problem: The oil price could bring inflation back. WTI is once again approaching the $100 mark. At the same time, the latest US producer prices show that inflationary pressure is far from gone. If the situation in the Middle East continues to worsen and important oil and trade routes are disrupted, energy and transportation could become significantly more expensive again. That would be particularly uncomfortable for monetary policy. Rising oil prices increase inflation, but they can hardly be fought with higher interest rates. A rate hike does not produce additional oil and does not solve geopolitical bottlenecks. It merely slows demand while at the same time making loans more expensive for companies, consumers, and the government. This further intensifies the US dilemma. Yields on long-term government bonds are already rising again. At the same time, the enormous level of government debt is increasing the pressure to keep financing costs low over the long term. The Federal Reserve would actually have to remain restrictive if inflation rises again, while the government is increasingly unable to cope with exactly that. For Bitcoin, this environment has two sides. In the short term, a new inflation shock would be rather negative. Rising yields and the prospect of interest rates staying high for longer drain liquidity from speculative markets. Bitcoin could therefore initially come under pressure together with other risk assets despite its long-term scarcity. In the long term, the picture looks different. If high interest rates become increasingly unsustainable for the financial system, political pressure to lower real financing costs again will rise. This could later once again create an environment of greater liquidity and financial repression. For scarce assets such as Bitcoin, that would generally be positive. Altcoins would be significantly more vulnerable than Bitcoin in another risk-off shock. The same applies to PulseChain. Rising energy prices, higher inflation, and high bond yields would initially not be a favorable environment for smaller crypto markets. For PulseBitcoin, the comparison with WPLS therefore once again remains decisive. If PLSB loses less during a weaker market phase or recovers faster than WPLS, that would be a sign of relative strength within the PulseChain ecosystem. The decisive question for the coming weeks is therefore not only how high the oil price rises. What matters is whether the geopolitical escalation develops into a new wave of inflation. Because then the Fed would have to choose between two problems: fighting inflation or relieving a highly indebted financial system. For Bitcoin, exactly this conflict could be dangerous in the short term, but highly significant in the long term. #CryptoMarketReport #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #Oil #Inflation #InterestRates #FederalReserve #Liquidity #MiddleEast #Altcoins #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB #WPLS

PulseBitcoin - Art, Structure, and Flow - Week 37/2026 Yesterday I visited the Alte Nationalgalerie in Berlin and looked at four different presentations there: “Cassirer and the Breakthrough of Impressionism,” “Scandal!,” the major collection “The Art of the 19th Century,” and “InterNationalgalerie 1: The Invention of Myths.” Even people who know little about art quickly realize there that paintings are not simply beautiful objects hanging on a wall. They also tell us how people lived, thought and viewed the world at a particular time. Actually, this thought began on the way to the museum. From the Unter den Linden subway station, I walked past old Berlin buildings where you can still see the repairs made to wartime damage. In many places, bullet holes were filled with lighter stone, which makes some façades look quite patchy. In front of the Alte Nationalgalerie it is different: The columns still carry their bullet holes from the Second World War. They were never repaired. So you stand in front of a building from the 19th century while looking at traces from 1945. About one kilometer away, Hitler was sitting in his bunker at the time with his last loyal followers, still hoping for a final victory while his regime was already collapsing. Today, people walk through the same area with museum tickets, smartphones and shopping bags. Berlin is remarkably good at producing these strange encounters between different periods of time. Inside the museum, the journey went even further back. The major collection “The Art of the 19th Century” shows how differently people painted within the span of just one hundred years. At the beginning, for example, there are landscapes that were not simply about depicting a mountain, the sea or a forest as accurately as possible. Artists such as Caspar David Friedrich also wanted to express feelings, loneliness, longing or the greatness of nature. Later, the world changes. Cities grow, factories are built, machines transform work. You can see this, for example, in Adolph Menzel. His famous “Iron Rolling Mill” does not show an idyllic landscape, but men doing hard physical labor among fire, metal and machinery. Suddenly, industry becomes a subject of art. You can see quite clearly from this: When the world changes, what artists paint eventually changes as well. I found the exhibition about Paul Cassirer and Impressionism particularly interesting. Impressionism sounds more complicated than it actually is. These artists no longer wanted to paint every picture in a smooth and perfect way, as the art academies of the time preferred. They were more interested in light, colors, movement and a particular moment. A painting was allowed to visibly look painted. Exactly what seems completely normal today in Monet, Renoir or Degas was new at the time and was by no means enthusiastically accepted by everyone. And this is where Paul Cassirer became interesting to me. He was not simply a Jewish art dealer. He apparently recognized very early what significance this new art could eventually acquire. He showed it, brought it to collectors and helped make artists known in Germany. German painters such as Max Liebermann, Lovis Corinth and Max Slevogt were also supported by him. What is remarkable about this is actually quite simple: Today these artists hang in famous museums and nobody is surprised by it. At the time, however, it was far from certain that their works would one day be regarded as important art. It took people like Cassirer who were willing to support something new even though general recognition did not yet exist. His personal end stands in a strange contrast to this. A man who had great influence on artists, collectors and the art world fell into a severe personal crisis himself. During an appointment connected with his divorce, he shot himself and died two days later. That stayed with me. Someone can be very successful outwardly, influence other people and shape entire developments without necessarily having his own life completely under control. Another presentation carried the fitting title “Scandal!” At its center was Hermione von Preuschen’s painting “Mors Imperator” from 1887. In the painting, death itself is shown as a ruler. Today you look at it and might think: interesting picture. At the time, however, something like this could cause considerably more outrage. Germany was still an empire at that time, and Kaiser Wilhelm I was already a very old man. So a painting in which death appears as a ruler could quickly be interpreted politically. The painting was rejected, but Hermione von Preuschen did not let that stop her. She exhibited it on her own initiative and used the attention created by the scandal. I found that almost more interesting than the painting itself. Today one would probably say that she understood how attention works. There was another particularly strange story: She sent a photograph of “Mors Imperator” to the Empress at a time when the Empress herself was confronted with her incurable cancer diagnosis. Death as ruler of the world therefore reaches a woman who is being confronted with the finiteness of her own life. If you wrote something like that in a novel, an editor might probably say: a little too much symbolism. Reality apparently had no editor. The presentation “The Invention of Myths,” featuring art from the National Museum in Warsaw, appealed to me less. It dealt strongly with history, national identity and the way a country sees itself and tells its own past. Against the background of Polish history, that is certainly understandable. Personally, however, much of it felt too heavy and politically charged to me. With art from the former Eastern Bloc, I often have this feeling. You sense how heavily history weighs on the images. It can still be interesting. That does not mean you have to like it. At some point I realized that the most interesting thing about this visit was not any single painting. It was the constant switching between different periods of time. Inside the museum you see the 19th century, the rise of industry, the German Empire and a new way of painting. Outside, the bullet holes from the Second World War remain in the columns. And right in the middle of all of it, present day Berlin simply continues as normal. That is one of the strangest characteristics of this city: History is not neatly sealed off in the past. Different periods sometimes stand directly next to each other. You set out simply to look at a few paintings and at some point you find yourself wondering where all the thoughts that came from a few images, biographies, buildings and bullet holes have taken you. Paul Cassirer in particular eventually brought me back to PulseBitcoin. His story shows something that goes far beyond art: When something is new, nobody knows with certainty what significance it may have later. The artists who today hang naturally in major museums first had to be discovered, supported and taken seriously. Only with time did something new become something that is now regarded as important. I find this question equally fascinating with PulseBitcoin. Nobody today can know how something will be viewed in ten or twenty years. But you can look at what it is built on, whether people engage with it and whether it develops its own history over the years. That is exactly what fascinates me about PulseBitcoin: 21 million, mining, halvings and smart contract. A clear, consistent structure: PulseBitcoin is Bitcoin as a smart contract on PulseChain. I actually only wanted to see four exhibitions and collection presentations. What I got was landscapes, factories, Impressionism, the German Empire, an extraordinary art dealer, a scandal from 1887, Polish history and bullet holes from 1945. At some point you end up asking when something new actually becomes something important. That is quite a journey for one museum visit. For Berlin, probably not. That inspired the following graphic. #AlteNationalgalerie #PaulCassirer #Impressionism #MorsImperator #BerlinArt #ArtHistory #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB

Crypto Market Report - Week 36/2026 The markets are once again facing a paradoxical problem: Good economic data has suddenly become bad news. In August, the United States added 162,000 new jobs. Only 55,000 had been expected. At the same time, the unemployment rate remained at 4.1 percent. Normally, this would point to a resilient economy. Nevertheless, the figures put pressure on the stock market. The reason is interest rates. The stronger the US economy remains, the less reason the Federal Reserve has to loosen monetary policy. On the contrary, the probability of another 25 basis point rate hike has increased significantly according to current market expectations. This further intensifies the familiar US dilemma. The economy is still strong enough to tolerate high interest rates, while at the same time the government is sitting on around $40 trillion in debt and will have to refinance enormous amounts of government bonds in the coming years. Higher interest rates help fight inflation, but at the same time they make financing the entire system more expensive. Political pressure is therefore increasing. Donald Trump has been calling for lower interest rates for some time. At the same time, the US Treasury has already begun expanding support for the market for long-term government bonds. This creates a contradictory environment for financial markets: In the short term, high interest rates can weigh on stocks and cryptocurrencies. In the long term, however, pressure on politicians and the central bank to provide cheaper financing and more liquidity continues to grow. Bitcoin is caught exactly between these two forces. After the strong recovery, the price temporarily climbed above $80,000. The key question now is whether Bitcoin can hold this higher level and overcome another important technical hurdle: the 50-week moving average. A sustained breakout above this level would significantly improve the long-term picture and could indicate that a new major upward cycle is actually developing. If Bitcoin fails at this zone and the recent rally is completely sold off again, however, that would be a warning signal. In that case, the possibility would remain that we have only seen a strong recovery within a larger correction. Our broader assessment therefore does not change completely yet. A sustainable trend reversal still has to be confirmed. Lower Bitcoin price zones also remain relevant if high interest rates trigger another major liquidity correction. For altcoins, this decision is particularly important. If Bitcoin confirms the breakout, more capital could subsequently flow back into smaller cryptocurrencies. If Bitcoin fails, altcoins would usually come under even greater pressure. The same applies to PulseChain. A stable Bitcoin would improve the conditions for renewed risk appetite within the ecosystem. In the event of another correction, WPLS and smaller PulseChain assets would likely react more sensitively. For PulseBitcoin, the comparison with WPLS therefore remains decisive. If PLSB continues to show relative strength against WPLS even during a weaker market phase, that would remain a positive signal within the PulseChain ecosystem. The most important question for the coming weeks is therefore not only whether the Fed cuts or raises interest rates. What matters is whether Bitcoin can confirm its breakout despite the difficult interest rate environment. That is exactly where a strong intermediate rally separates from a potential new bull cycle. #CryptoMarketReport #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #InterestRates #FederalReserve #Liquidity #Altcoins #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB #WPLS

PulseBitcoin - Art, Structure, and Flow - Week 36/2026 Today I visited the exhibition “THE URBAN SKIN” by Pietro Ruffo and Jan Bauer at the URBAN NATION Project Space in Berlin. The exhibition explores the relationship between humans, nature and civilization, as well as traces of history, change and transience. What stood out in particular were Pietro Ruffo’s spatially layered collages. Different visual and material levels are combined: human bodies, nature, cartographic structures and urban elements overlap and create the impression of different layers of life and civilization. You can immediately see how much work went into these collages. They were cut, arranged, combined and built up spatially. From a craftsmanship perspective, that is certainly impressive. Even so, I missed the moment when a great deal of work turns into something truly brilliant. I felt similarly about other motifs in the exhibition. Weathered walls, damaged marble faces and fragments reminiscent of ancient Roman sculptures tell stories of history, aging and transience. It works, but it was nothing really new. You know images like these from museums, documentaries and ultimately also from many history books. The cycle of nature, humans, life and civilization is also a major theme, but not one that surprises simply by existing. What surprised me instead was something completely different: The exhibition flyer and website impressed me more than what I later saw on site. The external presentation felt more modern, contemporary and visually exciting. In the Project Space itself, I found a relatively small gallery room that, in terms of size and atmosphere, reminded me a little of the many district galleries in Berlin. It was nice, and I once again discovered a new place and new works. My expectations, however, had been considerably higher because of the presentation beforehand. That ultimately became the most interesting thought of the visit for me: A strong presentation can attract attention and create expectations, but eventually you stand in front of the actual content. At that point, it is no longer the flyer, the website or the packaging that decides, but what is actually there. This thought can also be applied to PulseBitcoin. Attention and a strong presentation can create interest. But an idea only becomes truly exciting when there is also a convincing structure beneath the surface. That is exactly what fascinates me about PulseBitcoin: 21 million, mining, halvings and smart contract. A clear, consistent structure that does not just sound good, but actually exists: PulseBitcoin is Bitcoin as a smart contract on PulseChain. That is precisely why the visit was still interesting: New exhibitions always offer new impressions and comparisons. Sometimes the decisive thought comes less from a single work than from the difference between expectation and reality. Good packaging can create interest. In the end, the content has to convince. This inspired me to create the following graphic. #TheUrbanSkin #UrbanNation #BerlinArt #ContemporaryArt #DigitalCulture #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB

🟣 PULSEBITCOIN: WHAT IF BITCOIN HAD BEEN BUILT FOR THE SMART-CONTRACT ERA? Bitcoin changed the world by proving that digital scarcity could exist without a central authority. A fixed maximum supply. Predictable halvings. Mining instead of simply printing new coins. Rules that don't depend on someone deciding tomorrow to create more. But Bitcoin was created for a different technological era. What if you could preserve the monetary idea that made Bitcoin revolutionary, while adding the programmability of smart contracts and the possibilities of DeFi? That is the idea behind PulseBitcoin. A Bitcoin-inspired scarce digital asset built directly as an immutable smart contract on PulseChain. Not pWBTC. Not Bitcoin simply wrapped onto another network. **The Bitcoin of PulseChain.** ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ₿ KEEP THE SCARCITY. EXPAND THE POSSIBILITIES. Bitcoin introduced one of the most powerful ideas in digital finance: Scarcity can exist digitally. There can be a maximum. There can be predictable issuance. There can be halvings. There can be mining. And nobody needs to have the ability to simply print more whenever they want. PulseBitcoin takes this philosophy and brings it into a smart-contract environment. The goal isn't to “replace Bitcoin”. The idea is to take the principles that made Bitcoin revolutionary and combine them with functionality that only a programmable blockchain ecosystem can provide. Think: Bitcoin-inspired scarcity + Smart-contract functionality + DeFi + Liquidity + NFT mechanisms + Community-driven development + PulseChain infrastructure ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🟣 WHY “THE BITCOIN OF PULSECHAIN”? The comparison is about the monetary concept. Bitcoin has: • A hard maximum supply • Predictable issuance • Halvings • Mining • Digital scarcity PulseBitcoin follows the same broad philosophy. But instead of being designed as a standalone payment network, PLSB exists as a smart contract on PulseChain. That means the scarce asset can interact directly with a programmable DeFi ecosystem. The result is a different evolution of the Bitcoin idea: **Digital scarcity that can live inside a smart-contract ecosystem.** ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚡ FROM DIGITAL SCARCITY TO PROGRAMMABLE SCARCITY A scarce asset doesn't have to exist in isolation. A smart contract can interact with other smart contracts. That opens the door to: • Decentralized trading • Liquidity • Farming • NFT-based mechanisms • Other DeFi utilities • Ecosystem integrations • Community-driven development This is one of the fundamental differences between simply holding a scarce asset and building an ecosystem around one. PulseBitcoin keeps scarcity at the foundation. Then builds functionality around it. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⛏️ ~95% OF PLSB IS ALREADY MINED This is where the story becomes especially interesting. PLSB has actually been mined for years. These tokens were not simply created and handed out. They had to be mined through the protocol's mining system, requiring participation, time and the appropriate mining mechanism. Today: • Maximum supply: ~21M PLSB • Total mined: ~20.04M PLSB • Already mined: ~95% • Remaining to be mined: under 1M PLSB Approximately 95% of the entire maximum supply is already behind us. This changes the character of the asset. This is no longer primarily an early-stage mining story. It is increasingly a scarcity story. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⏳ THE 4TH HALVING IS ALREADY UNDERWAY PulseBitcoin follows a Bitcoin-inspired halving model. Every halving reduces the amount of PLSB available to miners. The current 4th halving contains: **656,250 PLSB** Approximately: **349,000 PLSB have already been mined** during this halving. That leaves roughly: **307,000 PLSB** within the current halving allocation. And the next halving reduces the available amount again. So the supply doesn't simply approach 21M. It approaches the maximum through progressively smaller mining allocations. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 SCARCITY + PERMANENT BURN PLSB also has a deflationary burn mechanism. Approximately **0.1% is burned with each mint.** The important part is what “burned” means: Those tokens are permanently removed. They cannot be returned to circulation. Approximately **300,000 PLSB** have already been burned. HexInfo, the creator of the ecosystem, has also burned approximately **1 million PLSB**. So the supply dynamics combine: ⛏️ Decreasing mining rewards through halvings + 🔥 Permanent token burns The maximum supply is limited. Mining becomes progressively smaller. And some tokens are permanently removed. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔒 MORE THAN 3M PLSB ARE ALREADY LOCKED Another important distinction: Maximum supply does not equal immediately available market supply. More than **3 million PLSB** are currently locked on PulseChain. That's roughly **15% of the entire 21M maximum supply.** The average lock duration is around **4 years.** NFT Locks are designed to encourage longer-term commitment and reduce impulsive short-term selling. The ecosystem also includes: • NFT Ladder mechanisms • Anti-Paper Hands mechanisms These mechanisms are built around the idea of encouraging patience and longer-term participation. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔐 THE CORE IS IMMUTABLE This is one of the most important things to understand about PulseBitcoin. The core product is already complete. Its fundamental rules aren't waiting on a future roadmap. The core is immutable. That means the fundamental foundation is not something that can simply be rewritten later. The ecosystem can continue developing around the core. New utilities can be created. Community initiatives can be organized. Additional applications can be developed. But the underlying PulseBitcoin product remains fixed. That gives participants something extremely important: **Known rules.** ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌱 WHAT EXISTS AROUND THE IMMUTABLE CORE? PulseBitcoin isn't only a number on a blockchain. An ecosystem has developed around the immutable core. ⛏️ **SOFTWARE ASIC MINING** PLSB can be mined through a software-based ASIC system without traditional physical mining hardware. This creates an active participation mechanism for producing PLSB. The important distinction is that the mining system is software-based rather than dependent on conventional energy-intensive mining hardware. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🟣 **DUAL MINING: PLSB + pLTC** The Software ASIC ecosystem can also support dual mining. Participants can mine: **PLSB + PulseLitecoin (pLTC)** This creates additional utility around the mining infrastructure and connects two Bitcoin-inspired assets within the broader ecosystem. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💧 **LIQUIDITY** PLSB is integrated into the PulseChain DeFi environment. Approximately **$100K** is currently locked in liquidity. Liquidity allows users to trade PLSB through decentralized markets and provides the infrastructure needed for a functioning token economy. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌾 **FARMING** PLSB also has farming functionality. This creates another way for users to interact with their assets inside the DeFi ecosystem instead of simply holding them. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🗳️ **COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE** The PLSB core itself is already closed and immutable. Community governance therefore isn't about changing the fundamental protocol. It is about deciding together what can be built, organized or supported around the existing ecosystem. That can include: • New ecosystem initiatives • Additional utilities • Community development • Fundraising for specific initiatives • Deciding what the community wants to develop next The core stays immutable. **The community can keep building around it.** ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔐 NO PREMINE. NO FOUNDER ALLOCATION. PLSB was launched without a premine or dedicated founder allocation. The supply is created through the protocol's mining mechanism. For a scarce asset, distribution matters. Not just how much can ever exist. But also how that supply entered the system. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🛡️ CERTIK-AUDITED. IMMUTABLE. 3+ YEARS. PulseBitcoin has undergone a CertiK security audit. The ecosystem has also been operating for more than 3 years. That gives the system something a brand-new token cannot have: History. There is an established protocol. A real supply history. Actual mining. Actual burns. Actual locks. Actual liquidity. An existing ecosystem. And an immutable core. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌊 BUILT ON PULSECHAIN PulseBitcoin is built directly on PulseChain. PulseChain provides the blockchain infrastructure for PLSB to operate as a smart-contract asset with fast transactions and very low transaction costs. This allows PLSB to exist directly inside a DeFi ecosystem rather than operating as an isolated asset. As the PulseChain ecosystem continues developing its infrastructure, applications and liquidity, the environment around PLSB continues to expand. PulseBitcoin is already **one of the best-performing tokens in the PulseChain ecosystem.** It seems that the moment of the greatest scarcity of ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 will coincide with the growth of the PulseChain network, which may have an unimaginable impact on the growth of PulseBitcoin and its lack of availability. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 THE BIGGER IDEA The interesting question isn't: “Can another token copy Bitcoin?” Anyone can copy a ticker, a logo or a supply number. The interesting question is: **Can the monetary ideas introduced by Bitcoin be combined with the programmability of smart contracts?** Fixed scarcity. Predictable halvings. Mining. Permanent burns. Long-term locks. DeFi. Liquidity. Community-driven development. And an immutable core. That's the direction PulseBitcoin has taken. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⏳ WHY THE CURRENT STAGE MATTERS The timing is important. Approximately **95% of the maximum 21M PLSB supply has already been mined.** Less than **1M PLSB remains to be mined.** The current 4th halving is already underway. Future halvings reduce mining allocations again. PLSB is being burned. More than 3M PLSB are locked. Average lock duration is around 4 years. The core is immutable. And the ecosystem continues to develop around it. The early question was: **“How much can still be mined?”** The increasingly important question is: **“How scarce can an already mature supply become?”** ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🛒 HOW TO GET PLSB For someone discovering PulseBitcoin today, access doesn't have to be complicated. **1️⃣ LIBERTYSWAP @LibertySwapFi ** libertyswap.finance LibertySwap provides a convenient cross-chain route for acquiring PLSB from supported assets (most known chains). The process can take approximately **1–2 minutes**, with a fee around **0.3%**, depending on the route and transaction conditions. PLSB is delivered directly to your wallet. So simple! **2️⃣ PULSEX** pulsex.com For users already on PulseChain, PulseX provides a direct decentralized trading route. Connect your wallet, select the PLSB pair (use contract address to add token), enter the amount and complete the swap on PulseChain. If PLSB doesn't appear automatically, add it using the official contract address below at your wallet (same to point 1). ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 **PULSEBITCOIN AT A GLANCE** If you've made it this far, here is the entire idea in one place: 🟣 **WHAT IS IT?** Bitcoin-inspired digital scarcity implemented as an immutable smart contract on PulseChain. ₿ **IDENTITY** The Bitcoin of PulseChain. ⚙️ **CORE** Immutable, with fundamental rules already defined. ⛏️ **MINING** PLSB is actually mined through the protocol's mining system. 📊 **MAXIMUM SUPPLY** ~21M PLSB. 📉 **ALREADY MINED** ~20.04M PLSB, approximately 95%. ⏳ **REMAINING** Under 1M PLSB remains to be mined. 🔄 **HALVINGS** Mining allocations decrease with each halving. 4th halving allocation: 656,250 PLSB. Approximately 349,000 already mined in the current halving. 🔥 **BURN** ~0.1% burned with each mint. ~300K PLSB already burned. ~1M PLSB additionally burned by HexInfo. 🔒 **LOCKED SUPPLY** More than 3M PLSB locked on PulseChain. Approximately 15% of the maximum supply. Average lock duration: ~4 years. 🧩 **LONG-TERM MECHANISMS** NFT Locks, NFT Ladder and Anti-Paper Hands mechanisms. ⛏️ **SOFTWARE ASIC** Software-based mining without traditional physical mining hardware. 🟣 **DUAL MINING** PLSB + PulseLitecoin (pLTC). 💧 **LIQUIDITY** Approximately $100K locked in liquidity. 🌾 **DEFI** Farming and decentralized trading functionality. 🗳️ **COMMUNITY** Community-driven development around the immutable core, including initiatives, utilities and fundraising. 🔐 **DISTRIBUTION** No premine. No founder allocation. 🛡️ **SECURITY** CertiK-audited. 📅 **HISTORY** More than 3 years of operation. 🌊 **NETWORK** Built directly on PulseChain. (also Ethereum version) ⚡ **ENVIRONMENT** Fast transactions and very low transaction costs. 📈 **POSITION** One of the best-performing tokens in the PulseChain ecosystem. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 **WHY PULSEBITCOIN IS DIFFERENT** It combines several ideas that normally exist separately: **Bitcoin-inspired scarcity.** **A maximum supply of ~21M.** **Real mining with decreasing rewards.** **~95% already mined.** **Less than 1M remaining.** **Permanent burn mechanics.** **Millions of PLSB locked for years.** **An immutable core.** **Smart-contract functionality.** **DeFi utility.** **Liquidity and farming.** **NFT-based long-term mechanisms.** **Software ASIC mining.** **Dual mining with pLTC.** **Community-driven ecosystem development.** **No premine.** **No founder allocation.** **CertiK audit.** **3+ years of history.** **Built directly on PulseChain.** This is why PulseBitcoin is more than simply another token with a 21M number attached to it. It is a complete, already-existing DeFi product built around an immutable Bitcoin-inspired monetary core. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ₿ **THE BITCOIN OF PULSECHAIN** Bitcoin gave the world digital scarcity. PulseBitcoin takes that idea into the smart-contract era. Scarcity from Bitcoin. Programmability from smart contracts. Utility from DeFi. Infrastructure from PulseChain. An immutable core. A growing ecosystem. And an increasingly scarce supply. **PulseBitcoin.** ⚠️ PulseBitcoin is NOT pWBTC. PLSB Contract: 0x5EE84583f67D5EcEa5420dBb42b462896E7f8D06 #PulseBitcoin #PLSB #PulseChain #Crypto #DeFi #Bitcoin ──────────────── IMPORTANT LINKS: pulsebitcoin.win (official website) pulselitecoin.app (dual mining ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 + pLTC) carn.fun (NFT locks, ladder, anti paper hands) pulsebitcoin.printify.me (Merch store – 100% to PulseX LP) t.me/pulsebitcoin (Telegram – best community) pulsedogecoin.net (ecosystem memecoin – 2.6M supply) ──────────────── LEARN HOW 🟢 START HERE Buy ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 & $ASIC nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… Mining vs Buying nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… What is ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06? nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Best First Strategy nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… PLSB is not pWBTC! nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… Why ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 for DeFi nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… ⚙️ UNDERSTAND THE SYSTEM Scarcity model ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 $pLTC $ASIC nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Minting Cycles ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… ASIC Supply Shrinking nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… PulseLitecoin + dual mining nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Digital gold 2.0 nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… DeFi ecosystem roles nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Diamond hands in practice nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Flywheel system nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… Audit report of ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Supply shock ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… Who created ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06? nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… BTC vs BCH vs PLSB nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… PulseBitcoin ecosystem nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… PulseBitcoin: Bitcoin of PulseChain nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… 💧 USE THE ECOSYSTEM Add liquidity & earn fees nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… Double PLS with Tru2X nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… Farm ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 $ASIC $pLTC nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… NFT Locks (ladder & anti paper) nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Why liquidity matters nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… Track ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 price & liquidity nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… FOMO effect in ethereum:0x5ee84583f67d5ecea5420dbb42b462896e7f8d06 nitter.net/pulsebitcoinpl/status/… DCA strategy explained nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… If This was 2011 nitter.net/PulseBitcoinPL/status/… PulseDogeCoin 2.6mln overview nitter.net/twitter/status/2026984…

PulseBitcoin - Art, Structure, and Flow - Week 35/2026 Today I visited the double exhibition DARK MATTER in Berlin. It consists of the KOLLEKTION with several smaller installations as well as FOREST SEASONS, a larger production in a separate hall. Both exhibitions work with light, movement, sound, and digital technology. But that was exactly where the problem lay for me: The individual elements were combined, but not in a way that created anything harmonious or positive. The KOLLEKTION was over quickly for me. I found the exhibition rooms very small, everything was gloomy and in some places so dark that you had to be careful not to trip. On top of that, there was loud electronic music. After about ten minutes, I was back outside. My impression was clear: For what was offered there, I found the price too high. FOREST SEASONS was larger in terms of space. The exhibition is located in a large hall and is apparently intended to create an artificial forest world. What I actually saw was a concrete floor, plastic plants, laser light, and I heard very loud electronic and techno music. The music was sometimes so loud that I wondered whether it could cause hearing damage. At the entrance, the ticket seller also told me not to stand too high because laser beams could get into your eyes. That did not exactly help create a relaxed or harmonious atmosphere for me either. FOREST SEASONS in particular made it clear to me what did not work: Anyone who has ever been in a forest knows the atmosphere there. A forest is calm and harmonious most of the time and full of natural sounds. Wind, leaves, birds, water, and changing light fit together naturally. Techno music, laser light, and artificial plants, on the other hand, create something completely different. Of course, you can combine these things, but just because you use different effects at the same time does not mean that a good composition emerges from them. For me, this is where an important difference between effect and quality lies: It is very easy to influence people emotionally. Darkness, extreme volume, glaring light, and oppressive sounds inevitably trigger something. But a strong reaction alone does not make strong art. Someone could also stand on the street and shout into your ear with a microphone and then claim that the reaction it caused was part of an artwork. Generating attention is easy. Creating something that combines different elements in such a way that they produce a convincing overall effect is much more difficult. At DARK MATTER, I had the impression that the focus was primarily on negative emotions: darkness, unrest, loudness, and an oppressive atmosphere. That may have been intentional, but it did not convince me. We live in the internet age and are confronted every day with extraordinary images, animations, music, and digital worlds. Expectations have therefore become much higher. Simply putting together a dark room, lasers, projections, and loud music is no longer enough for me today. At the entrance to FOREST SEASONS, I was told that the production lasts about 45 minutes. After around ten minutes, I asked myself whether I really wanted to stay just because I had already paid for the combination ticket. The ticket had cost 30 euros. The decision was then made quickly: The money had already been spent. That did not mean I also had to invest my time and spend another 35 minutes with something I did not enjoy. So I left. There is one achievement I have to give the people behind it credit for: They managed to bring together financing, space, technology, and a paying audience for this exhibition. That obviously requires persuasive ability. For me, perhaps the greatest artistic achievement was therefore managing to secure the money for this project in the first place. Respect for that, indeed. The result itself still did not convince me. And this negative experience ultimately led me to an interesting thought after all: Good design does not arise from simply throwing together as many strong elements as possible. What matters is whether these elements harmonize with one another and reinforce each other. This is exactly where I see a strong contrast with PulseBitcoin. PulseBitcoin is Bitcoin as a smart contract on PulseChain. The basic elements fit together logically: a maximum of 21 million units, mining, halvings, and a smart contract. Added to that is PulseChain as the technical environment and a community that carries the project forward over time. None of these elements stands alone. Only the combination creates the actual structure. The fixed supply creates scarcity. Mining determines issuance. Halvings change that issuance over time. The smart contract makes the rules transparent and permanently executable. PulseChain provides the DeFi infrastructure. The community ensures that this becomes not just code, but a living story. For me, this is the decisive point: Different components do not merely have to be present. They have to fit together. Sometimes you learn from a successful exhibition how something can be done. And sometimes you learn just as much from a disappointing exhibition about how it should not be done. That is exactly what I learned at DARK MATTER. With PulseBitcoin, on the other hand, I see a structure whose individual components fit together in an unusually harmonious way. That inspired me to create the following graphic. #DarkMatterBerlin #DigitalArt #Technology #DeFi #PulseChain #PulseBitcoin #PLSB

PulseBitcoin (PLSB) - Bitcoin as Smart Contract on PulseChain. #PulseBitcoin #PLSB #PulseChain