NEW @SearchlightInst paper! With AI poised to disrupt work in a range of ways, the U.S. should strengthen its job transition "muscle" to help workers secure roles in industries of the future. This can only happen if Congress fixes how major workforce programs are *funded* 🧵
1
21
37
23,341
Will Raderman retweeted
there’s been a spate of “pre-deployment review” bills intro’d in congress — and i welcome the focus on independent oversight of ai! — but many of these bills don’t address the worst ai risks. bills that require “snapshot in time” reviews of models right before they go out the door are insufficient, because risks can arise far before deployment (including during development and internal use.) the hugging face incident was mostly perpetrated by an internal model that wasn’t intended for public release! it wouldn’t have been prevented by a quick pre-deployment check. that’s why the ai researcher consensus has shifted towards embedded auditors / evaluators, with ongoing access to a company’s models, personnel, internal records, etc.
3
17
77
3,290
Will Raderman retweeted
WFH is the most underrated social and economic change of the last decade.
🚨🚨New paper by Rob Fairlie and @wu_jane finds youth summer unemployment was no different in 2026 than prior years. AI exposure has no effect on youth unemployment but remote work exposure does. Important addition to the AI & entry level work convo! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
6
21
275
62,306
Will Raderman retweeted
Democrats should see Trump’s failed presidency as a cautionary tale not something to emulate. slowboring.com/p/the-republi…
15
33
271
26,647
New from me in @TheArgumentMag today: the state of polling is Really Bad, and the rise of just making things up is going to be a problem for '28
1
18
75
7,870
Will Raderman retweeted
i’ve watched a lot of friends make unnecessarily costly decisions under the assumption that every element of one’s life must be a political expression — including: staying in exploitative nonprofit jobs, forgoing kids bc of climate change guilt, hooking themselves up to an IV drip of political news when it makes them miserable, cutting off family with even slight political disagreements. and i think very little of it redounds to any public benefit. it often impoverishes their life and by extension others’. the most effective and resilient public interest advocates i know cut themselves and others a lot of slack, because life is hard enough.
A gift link, because this piece is indeed bracing and worth reading in its entirety: nytimes.com/2026/09/20/magaz…
29
314
3,660
304,277
Endorse this
I think it’s worth recognizing that what gets published and viral on twitter are graphs that go straight up (accelerate). But there are many graphs, in fact the majority, that aren’t going straight up at all, and it’s worth publishing those too. This makes a big difference because we know people update on available information and fail to account for “missing information” which is what a Bayesian would do. The “dog that didn’t bark” or “what you see is all there is” phenomenon. So just seeing vertical lines will generate a biased point of view.
4
495
Will Raderman retweeted
Here are the estimates by country!
New paper with @BKleinTeeselink! Measuring AI adoption and employment changes across 41 countries. This is some of the first evidence on global changes in labor markets from AI. Paper and Substack explainer + lit review at bottom of 🧵
1
10
45
8,897
Will Raderman retweeted
Come work at the most interesting think tank in America politics! The social policy team at @NiskanenCenter is hiring a government affairs manager to cover our work & family policy portfolio. Submit your resume and cover letter (!) by September 30th. ⤵️
1
6
8
1,149
Will Raderman retweeted
Democratic Party insider Adam Jentleson discusses his new book, "Supermajority: How Democrats Can Build Lasting Power," and how he thinks the party should move forward. He argues that instead of chasing votes, "we should aspire to represent the most, the biggest number of people that you can, while still staying firmly rooted in your principles."
32
5
20
26,062
Will Raderman retweeted
Looking forward to talking Supermajority today with @JerusalemDemsas
Replying to @PoliticsProse
Saturday (9/19), join Adam Jentleson for SUPERMAJORITY: How Democrats Can Build Lasting Power - w/Jerusalem Demsas - 3pm @ Conn Ave:politics-prose.com/adam-jent…
2
8
23
14,770
When do we see the first Kalshi "bet to keep your Medicaid" ad
apparently you'll be able to satisfy medicaid work requirements in a lot of states with *gross* gambling winings of $580 every six months, meaning you could take offsetting bets, pay the vig, and be employed aei.org/commentary/the-medic…
1
1
9
818
It's a beautiful day in the (political) neighborhood.
3
8
24
11,916
Will Raderman retweeted
surreal to see my polling in the nyt
Politics is often described as "a battle between liberals and conservatives" — but most voters have much messier views than labels suggest. We call it heterodoxy. And, for the New York Times today, we mapped it out.
6
5
87
28,055
Highly highly encourage reading through the results
For the polling nerds, @SearchlightInst *also* published toplines and crosstabs for all 200-ish questions from our How To Build A Supermajority Project. You can download them from the project pages (link in reply). We've got results on a ton of topics!
246
For the polling nerds, @SearchlightInst *also* published toplines and crosstabs for all 200-ish questions from our How To Build A Supermajority Project. You can download them from the project pages (link in reply). We've got results on a ton of topics!
1
4
6
1,323
Politics is often described as "a battle between liberals and conservatives" — but most voters have much messier views than labels suggest. We call it heterodoxy. And, for the New York Times today, we mapped it out.
1
13
33
28,711
Will Raderman retweeted
Searchlight partnered with the Times to map out heterodoxy — and we found that barely 1/5 of America's voters represent the purely-idealogical left and right camps. nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
4
12
680
Will Raderman retweeted
The simplest way to think about this work is that only 10% of the electorate can be classified as completely ideologically liberal and 14% is completely conservative. Interestingly, these two coalitions are also by far the most likely to say all their friends hold the same political positions as them. IE: Most of the people who work in politics!
At @SearchlightInst we talk a lot about heterodoxy. Now, partnering with @nytimes, we can show you exactly what we mean. “In reality, people often have heterodox views that defy strict partisanship.” Take a minute to read this—it might change how you think about politics. nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
4
15
1,822