This was the turning point for a lot of folks.

The anti-@RealCandaceO operation is text book counter-narrative activities. In intelligence operations, once its identified that you have lost control of the information domain, you must understand why, how, and execute measures to reestablish balance. My assessment is that Candace was able to gain and establish control of the information space quickly after Charlie was killed, asking the questions many were wondering. This helped her amass a massive following of people wondering why we are being told to accept the ridiculous. I then assess that TPUSA realized they were in trouble but lacked the ability within the organization to counter Candace effectively. No one watches the Charlie Kirk Show, Erika is not likable, and the tactic of accusing everyone asking questions is an attack on a widow wasn't working. This is the signal that did it for me, the small creators on youtube and X organized. One creator even accidentally showed that he was using AI to figure out how to best coordinate messaging, credit to @baroncoleman for catching that months ago. What sticks out to me is that quietly organizing and coordinating information operations is exactly what I would do to counter Candace. Not only that, I would astroturf the information space. Get on major podcasts, post daily videos, post anything to undermine her on social media. I would intentionally take her out of context, misconstrue what she actually said, and even coopt big voices to use their platforms to do the same...like @paleochristcon. The problem is it without a mechanism to assess operational reflections, it doesnt work. No one is telling the anti-@RealCandaceO coalition that its inducing the Streisand effect. More people are coming to the subject wondering, "why are they attacking her and not answering her questions...or at least acknowledging that there are some legitimate questions here?" Right when I think a heavy and seasoned government hand is at play, they dont do things that are considered 101-level tactics. For example, rolling out experts to convince people that regardless of how crazy the official narrative is its legitimate (ref: Wuhan wet market, and NIST towers can collapse at free fall speed). Any seasoned professional knows that before you counter an undesirable narrative you must identify where there is some common ideological ground and then incrementally shape the space from there. Calling people "mother fuckers", "wine moms", and "retards" only works on a small amount of people. Additionally, engaging in Moaist Struggle Sessions and loyalty testing doesn't work either, only on those with weak constitution. Whoever is managing the effort against Candace needs to be fired immediately. You are bad at your job.

How do you think the midterms are looking for Republicans?

It’s truly heartbreaking to watch something so deeply personal and sacred be turned into public content. Those final moments with their children belonged to that family alone, and it’s devastating to see them used in a way that feels exploitative and dishonoring to his memory.

Pickles caught forgetting to crop out instructions from his handlers as he FAILS AGAIN to debunk a Charlie Kirk investigation angle 🤣 Why are they SO BAD at this? 🤔

Most people don’t know, but bottled water dates back centuries. Here is a rare picture from March of 1609 showing the bottled water in Persia. Trust me, bro.