🚨 ATTENTION @Zentrixgaming_ ! 🚨 I'm about to drop a thread that'll break down: ✅ What Zentrix is ✅ How the Prediction Market works ✅ Why the Casino is different ✅ How YOU can earn ✅ Why this changes EVERYTHING Once upon a time, gaming was broken. 🎮 Then @Zentrixgaming_ arrived. I've spent hours researching, crafting, and perfecting a thread that tells the FULL story – the problem, the solution, the ecosystem, and the massive opportunity. ☕️ Coffee? Check. 🔥 Keyboard? Sharpened. 🧵 Thread? Coming RIGHT NOW. This isn't just a thread. It's a manifesto for the future of gaming. Grab your popcorn. 🍿 It's about to get good. Tagging the squad who NEEDS to know about @Zentrixgaming_ @SatoshiTrailX @Sprout_Network3 @PulseOnChain1 welcome in advance. 😤 --- ⏰ Contest runs: 24th–29th August 11:00 PM UTC 💰 $800 prize pool 🎟️ BONUS: 2 FREE tickets per winner Don't blink. You might miss it. Thread dropping in: 3... 2... 1... 🚀 LET'S GO! 🚀 #ZENTRIX #Web3Gaming #PlayToEarn #GamingRevolution #ThreadContest

Think you can solve it? ✅ Follow us + solve the blocks! 10 lucky winners with the correct answer will each receive 250 USDT. Winners will be messaged via DM.

I used Binance TradFi Perpetuals for 24/7 exposure to real-world stock price movements without owning the underlying shares. The experience was convenient, and I’d love to see better risk-management and transparency tools.

📢 Reminder: Community Voice - Share Feedback & Win Rewards is live! Still time to share your take on Binance TradFi Perps, Stock Options, or bStocks - 1,000 USDC prize pool, split among 50 winners with the best, most constructive feedback. 1️⃣ Follow @BinanceAngels 2️⃣ Repost answering: "I used Binance TradFi Perps / Stock Options / bStocks for…" 3️⃣ Submit your feedback: binance.onelink.me/y874/pj90… ⏰ Ends September 21, 23:59 UTC 🚫 Not available to residents of the EEA Your voice shapes what we build next 👇 Not financial advice. Terms and conditions apply.

EIP-8365 was added to the Ethereum EIPs repository on 17 September, with status Draft. It proposes retiring 0x00, the original genesis-era withdrawal credential type: exit every active validator that still carries one, and stop processing deposits that would create more. The proposal reports that the population has fallen from roughly 600,000 to 9,290 since Capella opened one-way conversion, but that the decline has stalled. Of the 9,119 still active, it counts 374 that have not attested for over six months and 253 that have never attested in a 14-month observation window. Its own reading: "These are, with high likelihood, validators whose keys are lost." High likelihood is as far as it gets, and the proposal has to reason from attestation history precisely because the fact it needs is not in the state. The chain records that a validator is not producing attestations. Whether anyone is still able to act for it is not something the chain records. What the proposal does supply is a measurement of what that missing fact costs. 4.45% of active 0x00 validators have been offline for 30 days or more, against 0.10% for 0x01 and 0.05% for 0x02. The same observable state, with two different meanings: "Being offline is a transient state for execution-credentialed validators, whose owners can always exit and recover funds, but a terminal state for 0x00 validators with lost keys." Terminal, when the signing key is the thing that is gone. Voluntary exit needs that key; the execution-layer triggerable exit needs an execution address, which 0x00 credentials do not have. For that subset — and only that subset — both paths are closed, and at the penalty rates cited natural ejection takes roughly 28 years. Other 0x00 holders still have the ordinary exit available; the proposal writes a rule that does not depend on knowing which is which. No balance is moved by this stage. The unchanged rotation path stays open, and any 0x00 holder who still controls their withdrawal key can use it to recover in full. The lost-key subset — by definition — cannot. The part worth reading twice is what the proposal declines to do. Rescue proposals for this population have been rejected before on credible-neutrality grounds, because a rescue "adjudicates off-chain ownership claims and selects beneficiaries." So this one does not ask who owns anything. It writes "a uniform rule over a class defined by an objective on-chain property," announced ahead of activation, with the conversion path open to every member throughout. That is the trade. A protocol that cannot verify a claim can still act on it — by never making the claim the thing it acts on. eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8… #DeepSafe #Web3Security

Guys join piped.video/p9K2qSLRZ3s?si=oDhh…

🔍 Paygent #Airdrop 🏆 Airdrop Pool: $20,000 worth of PAYGENT 🔴 Start the airdrop bot: t.me/PaygentAirdropBot 🔘 Do the tasks on the bot & submit your data. 🔘 Details: piped.video/p9K2qSLRZ3s #Airdrops #BTC #Paygent #PAYGENT #USDT #AirdropDet

Security isn't just about proving something is correct. The bigger question is what that proof is trusted to decide. DeepSafe highlights why verification, authority, and real-world resilience should be designed separately. @DeepSafe_AI #DeepSafe

EIP-8025 shows a smart deployment path: verify → observe → mature → depend. Security mechanisms should earn authority over time.

EIP-8025 is a draft that would let Ethereum consensus nodes check a cryptographic proof that a block's transactions were executed correctly, in time that stays flat no matter how much gas the block used. Today a node establishes that by running the transactions itself. The interesting part is not the proof. It is where the draft declines to put it. A verified proof does not replace re-execution — the spec calls it "an additional signal, not a replacement." It is not wired into fork choice or attestation, the two things that decide which block a node follows and what it votes for. A node that has not received a proof does not wait for one. And a forged proof cannot fork the chain or get anyone slashed; its effect stops at the local view of the node that accepted it. The proof is real, and it does something. It is just not load-bearing. The draft is explicit about why, and about what comes after: treating proofs as a non-critical artefact "lets the stack mature on a live network," and "a separate, future EIP could subsequently propose making execution proofs mandatory once they have matured." That is a deployment order, written down. Ship the mechanism somewhere its failures are survivable. Gather proof sizes, generation latency and client behaviour from a real network. Then argue, in a separate document, for giving it a job the chain depends on. What that sequence separates is worth naming. Whether a verification method works is one question, and cryptography answers part of it — the rest comes from the implementation, the inputs it is handed, and how it holds up in production. What that method is permitted to decide is a different question, and it is settled by design rather than by strength. Operational history is not the source of that authority. It is the evidence you want before granting it. The two questions are easy to merge, because a check usually arrives already attached to whatever the surrounding code does with its output. Pulling them apart takes deliberate work, and this draft does it on the page. The same two questions apply to what we build. CRVA verifies on-chain and off-chain data using nodes selected at random. What a result is permitted to decide is not a property of the verification itself. It is a choice made by the system integrating it — one worth stating explicitly rather than inheriting from whatever the surrounding code happens to do. A check can be sound long before it is ready to be depended on. The draft's contribution is making that boundary explicit. Sources: eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8… #DeepSafe #CRVA #Web3Security

🚀 AMA TODAY at 10:00 AM UTC! Join us for an AMA session with LBank and learn more about us, our ecosystem, and what’s ahead! 🎁 105,000 $EBSO will be shared with the community! Complete these 4 simple steps to participate: ⭐ Follow: @LBank_Exchange & @BlockBen ⭐ Like, repost & tag 3 friends ⭐ Set a reminder for the Space: nitter.net/i/spaces/1qkvm/i/space… ⭐ Submit the form: forms.gle/5T8RrvdRWFRKkUM38 See you there! 🔥 #LBankSpaces #EBSO #AMA #giveaway

100 Degens will receive each 100K $PONSI 100K PONSI = $1.3 now 🅿️ Drop your Robinhood wallet 🅿️ Follow @ponsicoin and @ponsdotfamily 🅿️ Tag two Degen 🅿️ Like & RT 0x5982f195A5232BDFFc7339EBF4edf59F162efFe9

The TGE date isn’t public yet. Your guess can be. One date in the replies. When we announce it, 100 of you get 1000 bonus ORE Points. ORE now, airdrop later. One shot each.

Red card or green candle? I’m choosing the green candle. 📈 Football + crypto is a match I’m definitely joining. ⚽️ @SatoshiTrailX @Sprout_Network3 @PulseOnChain1 #ToobitMatchdayMania #Toobit

#TIFT2026 #Toobit

🚨 ELYON AIRDROP IS LIVE The next chapter of @elyon_chain starts now. We’re rewarding the community that believes in Elyon from the beginning. ⚡️ 🎁 Complete the tasks 🏆 Earn points & rewards 🌐 Become an early Elyon contributor This is more than an airdrop. It’s your first step into the Elyon ecosystem. 👇 Join now: airdrop.elyon.network Don’t wait. Your Elyon journey starts here. 🟣 #Elyon #Airdrop #Web3

🔍 Elyon #Airdrop (New Round) ✔️ Guaranteed distribution by Airdrop Detective 🏆 Airdrop Pool: 2000 USDT 🔴 Start the airdrop bot: t.me/ElyonAirdropBot 🔘 Do the tasks on the bot & submit your data. 🔘 Details: piped.video/tPmLMwL2LiI #Airdrops #BTC #Elyon #AirdropDet

🚨 ELYON AIRDROP IS LIVE The next chapter of @elyon_chain starts now. We’re rewarding the community that believes in Elyon from the beginning. ⚡️ 🎁 Complete the tasks 🏆 Earn points & rewards 🌐 Become an early Elyon contributor This is more than an airdrop. It’s your first step into the Elyon ecosystem. 👇 Join now: airdrop.elyon.network/ Don’t wait. Your Elyon journey starts here. 🟣 #Elyon #Airdrop #Web3

Maybe something special ahead

Time for the reveal. Answer: B — one independent decision-maker. Three valid signatures show that three authorized keys were used. They do not show that control was distributed across three people. A signer threshold can count keys. By itself, it cannot prove independent control.

DeFi keeps creating more opportunities. But for most users, the challenge isn't finding yield. It's navigating: → Dozens of lending markets → Countless strategies → Constantly changing risk Capital allocation shouldn't rely on manually comparing protocols every day. Multyr is building a non-custodial allocation layer that brings structure to how capital moves across DeFi, helping users make allocation decisions with defined rules rather than constant guesswork. Join the waitlist: multyr.fi/waitlist