24
5
93
3,156
You think the cop out of, God is the only thing that doesn't require a creator makes your case valid? That's you dismissing your own argument to justify your stupidity!
1
27
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
Which is literally let's make our definably fictional God the one thing that doesn't require a cause, despite claiming everything must have a cause! How do you know the universe in some unimaginable form or another wasn't an uncaused cause? Without just assuming a God!
27
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
God is definably fictional! And as to your second point, you've clearly demonstrated ignorance. The universe itself is proven to exist which gives it being uncaused more credibility that a character from stories. You don't accept, you assume and believe it "wasn't a priori"
21
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
Not a claim! A fact! A story and characters that can't be proven to be factual are by definition fictional! Unless you or anyone can PROVE the stories and God in the bible to be factual, they are DEFINABLY fictional. The fact that nobody can or has literally proves the FACT!
23
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
Wrong! I'm stating the FACT that God, given all knowledge available is DEFINABLY FICTIONAL, not stating the fact God is nonexistent. Give one bible story that actually proves the character and attributes of God. Saving Private Ryan isn't true because parts of the story were!
1
23
And my fact is a fact because it is a fact that a story that can't be proven factual is definably fictional. Unless you're changing definitions?
28
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
The point you're missing is the word STORY! God only exists within the structure of STORIES! And once again I haven't stated God to be none existent, I've stated the fact that that CHARACTER from those STORIES is DEFINABLY FICTIONAL! You can read... correct?
1
23
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
God exists as a fictional character in fictional stories. The fact you aren't claiming or providing proof otherwise proves my point. Can you prove God is real? Yes or no? If no, you are accepting God to be definably fictional regardless of whether or not you agree.
17
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
Listen muppet! A philosophical concept is not proof of anything! And even if the concept itself could be proven it DOESN'T PROVE a God and CERTAINLY DOESN'T PROVE the particular God YOU BELIEVE in. Get back to me WHEN you can PROVE your God isn't definably fictional!
1
31
I'll make it really easy for you. Copy, highlight or whatever you like, any part of what you've presented as "proof of God" where within it it states that God is factual and that God is proven to exist! I'll wait
37
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
So your so called "proof" is your assumptions based upon a concept, of which the concept itself can't be proven to be a fact! Added to the fact that it doesn't prove a God, it also certainly doesn't prove the one you believe in. I'll ask again, can you PROVE God? Yes or no?
31
This Post was deleted by the Post author.
It's a philosophical concept and is neither true nor false, it's a thought experiment, an idea. You're basing your argument on a concept, so any conclusion from that concept can't be considered proof no matter how logically you look at the concept.

Oct 12, 2025 · 7:14 PM UTC

1
897
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @NotEvolution1
In addition to that.. the philosophical argument is only based upon the limitations of human knowledge and conceptuality. To conclude God's existence based upon it, is to assume absolute knowledge of ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING.
1
1
484