Can I copy this sentiment ? Ditto

S A M E I’m out

WHO THE HELL TOOK THIS PHOTO???😒😂😂😂

Ok sir. Whatever you say, I will obey your wishes.

Just following Trump's request.

We did it, we finally did it

Someone was removed from the RNC convention waving a Mexican flag. Vance told him, “If you love Mexico so much, get your ass over there. I’ll pay for the plane ticket.” Meanwhile, Israeli flags were being waved in the same convention. If waving Mexico’s flag means “go to Mexico,” what exactly does waving Israel’s flag mean?

Tyler Robinson’s defense challenge the key text message behind count 6, arguing it was sent AFTER he had already turned himself into police. If that timeline is correct… How could Tyler Robinson have texted Lance Twiggs… if he was already in police custody? 👀 #BreakingNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #CrimeNews #TrendingNow

.@grok why was @Parodyjeffx suspended? @elonmusk - There must be transparency in these processes. We all “notice” the obvious abuse of these polices to target critics of Israel

Family of Fallen Air Force Major Denied Earned Compensation Because Congress Won’t Call Iran Conflict a War.

I am more angered by this than I have ever been in my life.

If Trump really wanted to lower beef prices he would support Massie’s PRIME Act which allows individual states to permit local custom slaughterhouses to sell individual cuts of meat directly to consumers, restaurants, and grocery stores within that same state. But instead the Big Four major meat processors in America control over 85% of the market and consequently the cost of processing meat is high. But with Massie’s PRIME Act, small processors would be allowed to compete and would drive down costs. It would also help smaller meat producers to sell their beef to local markets. And we need Country of Origin labeling for foreign imported and foreign processed meats. Americans deserve to know where the meat they are buying to feed themselves and their families is coming from, and we have the right to reject it based on its country of origin. Both of these I cosponsored and are Republican sponsored bills, why won’t the Republican controlled Congress pass these bills? Why won’t the Republican elected President support these legislations which are America First? The answer is the Big Four meat processors and their well paid lobbyists roam the halls of congress and get to go to meetings and fundraisers at the White House and YOU don’t!

They all know I also see Trump eating pizza

WOW! Ok I can get on board with this take nitter.net/StonesThrones/status/2…

Tucker for president

Imagine posting this RIGHT AFTER many Americans believe Spokane Washington was hit with a DEW that caused the fires…. Completely tone deaf lol.

Tell me about it.

Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along! Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.” They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying. I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself. What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude. Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.” To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few: THE OTHER GUNMAN An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case. He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up. DISPATCH AUDIO 911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.” DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.” DNA DISCREPANCIES Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle. INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment. THE UNFIRED BULLET During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was. ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom. As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims. Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.” As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture. Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones. And… exhale. These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk. What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions. Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice. This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” Mikki Willis Investigative Filmmaker

The problem isn’t that recent elections were stolen - we won the damn elections. White House, Senate, House, even the Supreme Court leans our way. The fraud is that our party got elected and broke our campaign promises to voters.

BOOM !!! That’s the video we been waiting for! Thank you