Even if Christian nationalism & Postmillennialism were true, since God is the one who makes believers out of men through the gospel, those of us who reject both views do not have to change a thing. We will just keep preaching and teaching men & see what God does.

A huge and unanswered problem for Christian’s Nationalism is Ecclesiastical Pluralism. This is demonstrated not just in Christendom but also in the founding of this nation. Christian Nationalism The Problem of Ecclesiastical Pluralism youtu.be/dfJQBMJVjrw?is=dF3N… via @YouTube

By Far the best video you are going to see on the Internet! PLEASE repost and share...

Christian Nationalism The Problem of Ecclesiastical Pluralism youtu.be/dfJQBMJVjrw?si=w8Qp… via @YouTube

Frank Turek is mistaken. The earth is not old. The Bible teaches that the earth is young: 1) "The Heavens and the Earth" in Genesis 1:1 and Exodus 20:11 Gen 1:1 - In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. Ex 20:11 - For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy. "The heavens and the earth" is the same Hebrew phrase in both Genesis 1:1 and Exodus 20:11. Moses wrote both. There was no gap between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:3. God made all creation in six lunar days. 2) Light predates and postdates the sun A. God created light on the first day and the sun on the 4th day (Gen 1:3; Gen 1:14-19). B. Psalm 104 is the 7 Days of creation in poetic form. And Ps. 104:1-2 corresponds to the first day of creation, arguing that God wraps Himself in light like a garment. C. The Bible begins with God being the light and the Bible ends with God being the light. Revelation 22:5 - "And night will be no more. They will need no light of lamp or sun, for the Lord God will be their light, and they will reign forever and ever." 3. The generations of the heaven and the earth Genesis 2:4 - "These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens." The Hebrew word "generations" is taken as literal time throughout the rest of Genesis, and therefore should be taken as seven literal days in Genesis 1:1-2:4: Genesis 5:1 – The book of the generations of Adam Genesis 6:9 – The generations of Noah Genesis 10:1 – The generations of the sons of Noah Genesis 10:32 – "...according to their generations, in their nations" Genesis 11:10 – The generations of Shem Genesis 11:27 – The generations of Terah Genesis 25:12 – The generations of Ishmael Genesis 25:13 – "...by their names, according to their generations" Genesis 25:19 – The generations of Isaac Genesis 36:1 – The generations of Esau Genesis 36:9 – The generations of Esau father of the Edomites Genesis 37:2 – The generations of Jacob 4. The Testimony of Theological Liberals: A. Julius Wellhausen, popularized the Documentary Hypothesis for the Pentateuch. He wrote about the author of Genesis: “He undoubtedly wants to depict faithfully the factual course of events in the coming-to-be of the world, he wants to give a cosmogonic theory. Anyone who denies that is confusing the value of the story for us with the intention of the author.” B. Hermann Gunkel, the father of form criticism, argued, “People should never have denied that Genesis 1 wants to recount how the coming-to-be of the world actually happened.” C. James Barr, one of the most distinguished modern liberal Old Testament scholars, wrote, "To take a well-known instance, most conservative evangelical opinion today does not pursue a literal interpretation of the creation story in Genesis. A literal interpretation would hold that the world was created in six days, these days being the first of the series which we still experience as days and nights…In fact, the only natural exegesis is a literal one, in the sense that this is what the author meant.” James Barr also wrote elsewhere, “So far as I know there is no professor of Hebrew or Old Testament at any world-class university who does not believe that the writer(s) of Genesis 1-11 intended to convey to their readers the ideas that: a) creation took place in a series of six days which were the same as the days of 24 hours we now experience; b) the figures contained in the Genesis genealogies provide by simple addition a chronology from the beginning of the world up to the later stages of the Biblical story, and, c) Noah’s flood was understood to be worldwide, and to have extinguished all human and land animal life except for those in the ark." D. Geerhard von Rad, maybe the foremost Old Testament theologian of the 1900s, wrote about Genesis 1, “Everything that is said here is intended to hold true entirely and exactly as it stands.” “Everything that is said here is to be accepted exactly as it is written; nothing is to be interpreted symbolically or metaphorically." “The seven days are unquestionably to be understood as actual days and as a unique, unrepeatable lapse of time in the world.” 5. Psalm 104 corresponds to Genesis 1 A. Day 1: Gen 1:1-5 - "Let there be light." Ps 104:1-2 - "You are clothed with splendor...covering yourself with light." B. Day 2: Gen 1:6-8 - "Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters." Ps 104:2-4 - "He lays the beams of his chambers on the waters." C. Day 3: Gen 1:9-13 - "Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together" "dry land appear," "earth sprout vegetation" Ps 104:5-18 - "The waters stood above the mountains...you set a boundary that they may not pass, so that they might not again cover the earth" "You cause the grass to grow for the livestock and plants for man to cultivate" D. Day 4: Gen 1:14-19 - "lights in the expanse...for signs and seasons" "the greater light to rule the day" "the lesser light to rule the night" Ps 104:19-23 - "He made the moon to mark the seasons; the sun knows its time for setting." E. Day 5: Gen 1:20-23 - "waters swarm...with living creatures" "let birds fly above the earth" Ps 104:24-26 - "birds...sing among the branches" "sea, great and wide, which teems with creatures innumerable" F. Day 6: Gen 1:24-31 - "bring forth living creatures" "let us make man in our image" Ps 104:27-30 - "young lions roar for their prey, seeking their food from God" "Man goes out to his work and to his labor" G. Day 7: Gen 2:1-4 - "God rested on the seventh day and made it holy" Ps 104:31-35 - "may the Lord rejoice in His works" H. Chiastic Structure of Psalm 104 corresponding to the 7 Days of Creation: i. Introduction: v.1a – Bless the Lord, O my Soul! ii. Day One: v. 1b-2a – O LORD (YHWH) my God iii. Day Two: v. 2b-4 – emphasis on the wind, spirit, or breath (Heb. ruah, two times) iv. Day Three: v.5-18 – emphasis on the deep, sea waters, and the springs v. Day Four: v.19-24 – moon, sun, and climactic exultation iv. Day Five: v.25-26 – emphasis on the sea and its moving things iii. Day Six: v.27-30 – emphasis on the spirit or breath (Heb. ruah, two times) ii. Day Seven: v.31-35a – theophany and praise, O LORD (YHWH) my God. i. Conclusion: “Bless the Lord, O my soul.”* SOURCE: This post is a summary of several arguments made in The Genesis Creation Account and the Old Testament edited by Gerald Klingbeil

I said years ago that the tolerance message was a ruse. These vile deviants have no interest in tolerance. You had better know this before you vote. They are tyrants.

This is the best explanation between left and right I have heard in a long time! #RepublicanValues #democraticvalues

Here is the infamous JD Hall claiming that John MacArthur went to Epstein Island. @Phil_Johnson_ this man has lost his way. As if JD Hall had any modicum of respectability remaining at this point. Seems like grounds for a suit to me.

Those who think the Reformation was a mistake also think that immorality is just imperfection, and false doctrine is really just a different perspective. True faith purges both!

Love Ken Ham!

Everybody with common sense should vote Republican in November! If you don't believe me, just listen to this.. No Socialist/Communist!!

Theological error is not merely an unfortunate intellectual mistake without spiritual consequences. If your attitude reflects that kind of thinking, you clearly do not have the mind of Christ on the subject of divine truth.

Any doctrine that has God learning information that He previously did not know is incompatible with classic Christian theism. I believe it is blasphemy.

If your interpretation of the Great Commission does not have for its ground its context, Matt. 16:18, thus drawing a direct line between Matt. 28:18-20 to Matt. 16:18, you surely have a very defective understanding of the Great Commission.

Can we please have this woman run for anything so that we can elect her and ultimately make her POTUS?