Total linear 'scientistic' BS - no one has yet proved time runs in any 'direction' - Minkowski and Hamiltonian are only pre-written assumptions inferring time 'runs' along a linear line of past<present>future = purely a math assumption ->not a reality<-
sciencealert.com/physicists-…
1
1
16
It's the same neurons that fire for love and hate. To the brain, jealous-envy feels exactly like the rush from love.
SocialMadia™ feeds the brute masses doses of Schadenfreude as an operative.
1
1
26
The reason people deliberately follow topics they dislike is only because the resulting drama, social comparison & occasional schadenfreude activate reward circuitry (incl ventral striatum) in ways that feel just as stimulating as being on a hot date.
1
22
For ℜ, Black Holes [& Dark Matter] are planar accounting errors - not 'things'
space.com/astronomy/dark-uni…
2
21
A near perfect power of 3 from Solvay Conference Oct 1927 to Oct 24 2026 - when ℜ the Richardian algebra manifest showing Solvay linear theories are arising from a volumetric substrate that allows them to exist.
#physics #MathsLogic
16
When people get up out of bed from a night of dreams, they are still dreaming all day long. Then SocialMadia™ manages, interrupts/informs their chemistry where they believe anything the dream offers. Love and hate - it's all the same thing.
sciencealert.com/your-brain-…
23
Unspoiled Appalachia ~
looks like the road home
New Brunswick Landscape
William G.R. Hind c. 1879-1889
#watercolour and #gouache with gum arabica on wove paper, 24.8 × 34.8 cm
National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa
3
6
58
For ℜ, the apparent computational immensity is an artifact of attempting to enumerate volumetric relationships along a linear path.
An enormous linear accounting requirement doesn't necessarily imply an enormous physical inventory.
#physics #Mathslogic #Quantum
1
1
23
His 4D is still on the plane. It doesn't matter how many Hilbert dimensions are added, for ℜ, the Minkowski and Hamiltonian are planar accountings, unable to observe the underlying volume from which Solvay theories are arising and allowed to exist.
2
23
For ℜ, this is still planar accounting.
No new line or direction off the plane is indicated. For Solvay theorists, it's not even conceived of.
sciencealert.com/a-lost-schr…
1
25
For ℜ, Whittaker was accounting for the outcome on the plane. Schrödinger questioned whether the plane's two outcomes exhausted the structure capable of producing them.
A close conceptual parallel to ℜ's distinction between a facet and the completed volume.
1
11