The Carrier Bag Theory 🛍️ What if an ordinary bag for carrying food tells us as much about human history as all those stories of wars and victories? At the Value of Commons gathering, I came across a small book: Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. It was in German, so I used AI to help me understand it. Le Guin writes about our habit of telling stories through a hero, a conflict and a victory. A spear has a direction, a target and a moment of impact. It makes for a compelling story. But people also had to gather food, carry it, store it and share it. For that, they needed a bag. I once heard an African saying: “My food is in my neighbour’s stomach.” At first it sounded strange. Now I think of the bag: what I gather can be carried to someone else. I grew up in a fairly militarised environment. Many stories were about achievements, victories and wars. My childhood toys, of course, included weapons. Perhaps, during Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine, this seems like an odd subject. We have to fight to survive. But war does not suspend daily life. People still need to bring food home, care for loved ones and help those who are struggling. And even beyond war, I keep encountering the cult of results. My disability does not show up in the figures I put on slides. People see charts and impact metrics, but rarely how many hours I can work, how little I sometimes sleep, or how much time I spend lying down because of inflammation. I think about our ecovillages, too. Someone cooks for everyone. Someone looks after the children or notices that a neighbour needs help. In a report, all of this may become one line: “The event took place.” Often it is not recorded at all. What if we counted not only what got done, but what made it possible for people to do it? At that same gathering, we organised a potato party and harvested together. I noticed that many people enjoyed it more than the discussions about the commons. Everyone did what they could. The pile of potatoes grew, people talked, and no one had to compete for a chance to speak. Sometimes harvesting potatoes together creates more community than a heated debate in which we beat each other with words to prove we are right. Le Guin offered the bag as another way to tell a story. I wonder whether it can also change what we notice in our communities. Is there room in our structures for someone who cannot work at full capacity today? Do we see those who support others but barely appear in our reports? Swords and victories are easy to remember. It takes more effort to see the people who grew the food, saved the seeds, fed their neighbours and cared for those who could not care for themselves. Without them, there would be no next chapter.

On financial support for ecovillages 🌾 In an experiment with rats, some survived only minutes in water. Others swam for nearly three days. Researchers also found that rats briefly immersed and released could survive much longer in later trials. I think about this when we look for ways to support ecovillages. Ukraine has no municipal programmes to develop them. No decentralised funds ready to finance a new shared space. Even the idea of cooperating to live together is barely there. What we have instead is the dream of a little clay house and a garden full of cherry trees. Everyone wants their own plot. Their own island, far from this sick world. We are damn irrational when we design ecovillages. Everyone wants a homestead, sometimes a whole street, with no plan for what happens in five or ten years when the children start school. But we coordinate a network of places that existed before us. We support what is already there, with all its contradictions. During the war, the question is not how resilient their local economies should be. It is how long these communities can hold on as things around them collapse. Financial irrigation. Sometimes people need very little to stay afloat. Money to plant trees. Firewood for a shared space. A solar power system. Yesterday I learned that several more active people had been mobilised. Several families had lost their homes near the front. Others are preparing for a winter without electricity, mobile signal, fuel, deliveries, internet or even a bus to the district centre. A 1990s survivalist’s dream, in all its glory. Yet they are still with us. We are waiting for another truck from Denmark with essential supplies and around 100 bicycles. So that, if necessary, people can ride to an evacuation point. Ecovillages are disappearing, along with towns, villages and the infrastructure around them. People move west. Some radically change their lives or erase their alternative past. With them, we lose stories, institutional memory and the history of connections. We record activities in a blockchain registry. We have created community work pools that reward people for documenting what they do. We publish reports and monthly digests through European and international channels. Even if our network disappears, there should be a record of how it happened, why, and how long we held on. We seek funding for ecological and community work so this movement can continue. I do not believe the war will end in the next three to five years. We are not one happy team without conflict or burnout, either. We are swimming in deep water, with no solid ground in sight. No compass. Only faint points of reference, often misleading ones. Sometimes it seems everything is going well. Sometimes I think we do this for whoever comes after us. So they can study our history and understand why things happened as they did. Thank you to the visionaries and donors who find a reason to support us. To the activists who still find the strength to continue. And to my colleagues who put up with us. #Ecovillages #CommunitySupport

Today, GEN Ukraine turns eight 🌾 I was moved to tears. We planned a short celebratory call but ended up talking for almost three hours. Around 37 connections were online, but more people were present. Some joined from their ecovillages, gardens, workplaces, abroad, or even from a military unit during an air-raid alert. People I had not seen for years joined us. Each shared their story: how they found GEN Ukraine, whom they met, what they learned, and which projects grew from those encounters. We remembered gatherings and courses, journeys through Ukrainian and ecovillages, the Green Road, support for displaced people, bicycle workshops, solar stations, festivals, and educational programmes. But the longer I listened, the clearer it became: the main outcome of these eight years is not the projects. It is the people — and the connections between them. Some met through our network and began building communities. Others found partners, joined exchanges, or created projects. Some hosted displaced families or distributed bicycles, laptops, greenhouses, and solar equipment. Some stepped away for years and later returned. Today, some live abroad. Some serve in the military. Others continue building ecovillages and community spaces in Ukraine during the war. But the connections remain. Reports can count funding, equipment, events, and participants. But it is much harder to measure the encounters that changed lives, the communities that grew from our gatherings, or the people who still call one another years later and create something together. GEN Ukraine has never been homogeneous. It brings together many kinds of ecovillages, communities, educational spaces, and rural initiatives. We are very different. We have experienced conflicts, hurt, and periods of distance. The war has exposed those differences even more sharply. And yet the network did not fall apart. It proved larger than one organisation, a few coordinators, grants, or projects. It lives horizontally — through visits, collective work, friendships, mutual support, and initiatives that emerge without our direct involvement. One thought came up several times: an ecovillage is not only about ecological buildings, solar panels, or living on the land. Above all, it is about the ecology of relationships — how we communicate, make decisions, move through conflict, and relate to the outside world. I often travel to international gatherings and try to be the voice of our communities. Today, I felt again exactly whom I represent. People who have spent years building ecovillages and community spaces. Who plant trees, welcome others, educate children, create workshops, regenerate land, and continue doing all of this during the war. People who do not merely talk about another way of living, but try to create it every day. I am especially grateful to everyone who joined and shared their story. Because we are @gen_ukraine. Together, We Are Strong. Global Ecovillage Network Ukraine

Data is not reality itself. It is only the part of reality that the system has learned to see. 🌾 Our network includes more than 60 ecovillages and community spaces. And almost everywhere, resources are scarce. One community needs to repair a roof. Another needs additional solar panels, better insulation for a shared space, or tools for a community bike workshop. To support this work, we create shared funding pools. For now, the mechanism is very simple: a community organizes a volunteer workday, publishes a report, and receives 10 USDC. But when we put all these reports into one table and visualized them, something more interesting than the distribution of money became visible. Some communities report regularly and receive a significant share of the support. Others are barely represented. At first glance, you might conclude that the first group is simply more active. But that is not necessarily true. Communities may organize volunteer workdays regularly without publishing reports. People may lack the time, energy, digital skills, or capacity to understand how the pool works and properly document what they have done. So funding does not necessarily flow to those who do the most work. It flows more easily to those whose work has become visible to the system. And this creates an interesting systemic problem. If rewards depend on reporting, while the ability to report depends on organizational capacity, the system may gradually reinforce communities that are already stronger. They document more → receive more resources → increase their capacity → document even more. Meanwhile, less organized communities can remain invisible even when a lot of real work is happening on the ground. This is no longer only a question of funding allocation. It is a question of institutional memory. What does our network actually remember about the work being done? Which actions become part of our shared history — and which disappear simply because nobody had the capacity to document them? And what can such a simple visualization tell us about weaknesses in the capacity of our communities? Perhaps the next round of support should go where organizational capacity is lower. Perhaps some communities need help documenting work they have already done. Or perhaps the reporting mechanism itself needs to become much simpler. And we don’t necessarily need complex accounting systems, blockchains, or dashboards spread across three monitors to see these patterns. Sometimes a spreadsheet, a pencil and a sheet of paper are enough. You could even visualize the distribution with stones on the ground. Accounting preserves the memory of what happened. But only of what was recorded. A good system should therefore do more than show us what it can see. It should also help us understand who — and what — remains invisible. Thank Will Ridduck and @grassEcon

Our Summer 2026 Highlights

Happy Independence Day, Ukraine! 🇺🇦 We are all building our Ukraine, however grand that may sound. We build it every day through what we do. And yes, things rarely go according to plan. Today, the price of building this country is unbearably and unjustly high. Honor to everyone who has died. And to everyone defending Ukraine today — with weapons and without them. And also to those defending our environment, nature, and ecosystems. This is an unequal struggle too. This resistance is often difficult and invisible. But it is also a struggle for what kind of country we will leave behind. Ukraine is large, beautiful, and incredibly diverse. And we all carry it with us, even those who are far away. At international gatherings, I often hear people introduce themselves through two countries: their country of origin and their country of residence. I still name only one — Ukraine. And I understand that today, this also comes with a price. As a Ukrainian man, having the possibility to cross the border and represent Ukraine and our ecovillage network internationally is both a great privilege and a responsibility. And wherever I go, I keep saying roughly the same thing: At our level, we are doing enough. No, we are not doing everything possible. We could do more. Better. More effectively. More productively. We could. And at the same time, I am deeply grateful to everyone around me. Because sometimes it feels like there is no energy left, yet the work keeps moving forward. Someone picks it up and continues what was started. That gives me something solid to stand on. We are a large country. We have enough people, intelligence, experience, and potential to endure. And we have partners and good friends who stand beside us. I want future generations to be able to say one day: because of all these people, the country endured. And it became strong, prosperous, and safe. I want people to come to Ukraine to learn, to work, and to exchange experience. I want Ukraine to be seen not only as a country that survived a terrible war, but as a country that afterwards managed to build strong institutions, a vibrant civil society, a modern economy — and regenerate its land. Despite everything, I believe in our potential. No matter how much I sometimes complain that everything is falling apart, I remain an incurable Ukrainian patriot and optimist. I believe we can build institutions that genuinely represent the interests of civil society. And I want to believe that eventually we will build a mature, liberal, and safe society for the generations that come after us. A society where people can think not only about survival, but about creating a flourishing, modern, technological future. Let it be our own version. Let it not follow the script. But one day, it will happen. And I want our neighbours to be able to look at Ukraine and simply say: Yes. They did it. They endured. And they are our friends. Happy Independence Day, Ukraine. 🇺🇦 #UkraineIndependenceDay #Ukraine #CivilSociety #Regeneration

Stand with Ukraine 🇺🇦 #crypto #web3 #refi #localism #commons

Everything what we do, we write in blockchain. It is our new public story...

Should everything destroyed by war be rebuilt? 🌾 🇬🇪 This is Kekhvi, a Georgian village in South Ossetia — internationally recognized as part of Georgia. After the 2008 war, the village was largely destroyed. Human Rights Watch documented systematic looting and burning of Georgian villages after the fighting. Satellite imagery identified 109 destroyed and 44 severely damaged buildings in Kekhvi. Twelve years later, forest was gradually returning where the village once stood. Ukraine will face a similar question on a much larger scale. Destroyed villages. Mined fields. Degraded farmland. Floodplains and abandoned territories. Do we automatically rebuild everything as it was — and return every hectare of black soil to agriculture? Or can some territories follow a third path between abandonment and intensive cultivation: ecosystem regeneration? I believe this could become part of Ukraine’s reconstruction model. Some destroyed territories could host new forms of regenerative communities and ecovillages — places whose economic function includes restoring landscapes rather than simply extracting value from them. Restoring steppes, forests, wetlands, soils and biodiversity. Retaining water. Creating ecological corridors and protected areas. Today, digital monitoring can increasingly measure these outcomes: vegetation, soil conditions, biodiversity and carbon sequestration. And measurable regeneration can create an economy of its own: carbon markets, biodiversity finance, payments for ecosystem services, climate funds and eventually compensation for environmental damage caused by war. There is already a historical precedent. After Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the UN established a compensation mechanism through which Iraq eventually paid $52.4 billion. Environmental damage and depletion of natural resources were recognized as a separate category, with substantial funding directed toward ecosystem restoration. Ukraine should think in the same category. Not only: How much will it cost to rebuild this village, farm or grain terminal? But also: How much will it cost to restore this ecosystem? Ukraine does not necessarily need to return every hectare to grain production simply because we have some of the world’s richest soils. Global grain markets were severely disrupted after Ukrainian ports were blocked, but they adapted through new suppliers, production and trade routes. Ukrainian grain remains important. But global food security does not depend on cultivating every abandoned field or ravine. Some war-damaged territories could develop a different economic specialization: the economy of regeneration. An economy where people are paid not only for what they extract, grow and sell, but also for measurable ecological recovery. Where, twenty years later, a degraded field has once again become steppe, wetland or forest — with biodiversity, water and a living community around it. Perhaps this is also one possible model for rebuilding Ukraine. And perhaps we do not need to wait until the war ends to start designing it. #Ukraine #Reconstruction #Regeneration #EcosystemRestoration #ReFi #Ecovillages #ClimateFinance

What’s happening across our ecovillage network this summer 🌿 The MaistryMy makers’ caravan reached Kharkiv region and even connected Byshkyn with Andorra — linking our communities in Ukraine with those abroad. Austrian musician Phoenix Maria is touring Ukraine again with healing concerts. I joke that he has become our main summer ambassador. Children’s forest camps are happening across the network: in the Carpathians, Pokuttia, Kupelia, VeloSelo Salyntsi and other places. Forests, rivers, rafting and community life instead of another summer in front of screens. Volunteer camps continue, while Tepla Hora runs the Kolo recovery programme. Zeleni Kruchi hosts weekly activities for veterans’ families, and several other communities offer smaller recovery practices. Soon, Tepla Hora will also host Stezhka — a creative camp for adults. We’re also finishing the distribution of Danish bicycles to rural communities where a few kilometres can make a real difference. Meanwhile, I barely leave home — we keep searching for resources for new projects. Some work, some don’t, and some we simply decline because our capacity has limits. What didn’t happen? We hoped to expand biodiversity monitoring and mapping this season. We managed only a few local actions. Maybe next season. This is what our network increasingly looks like: not one big central project, but many small grassroots processes — and an infrastructure helping people and communities find each other and make things happen. Global Ecovillage Network Ukraine #Ecovillages #Ukraine #Regeneration

A few thoughts on bicycles. Or how we solve mobility in rural ecovillages. 🚲 For us, bicycles are not primarily about transport. They are about freeing up time. In our ecovillages, productive time—especially women’s time—is one of our most valuable resources. Women often hold together families, communities, volunteering, and new local initiatives. Rural life means distances: 1–5 km to a shared community space, 10–12 km to school, the market, or the nearest town. Every trip takes time and money. With support from our partners in Denmark and the Netherlands, we have distributed more than 250 bicycles, established around 10 community bike workshops, and converted dozens of bikes into e-bikes. Almost all of this was built by volunteers. This is not just about sustainable mobility. It is about giving people back hours of their lives. Hours that can be spent with children, launching a retreat, organizing a workshop, supporting neighbors, or simply taking a walk in the forest. I recently read a famous text claiming cyclists are “bad for the economy” because they buy less fuel, fewer cars, and less fast food. Our experience suggests the opposite. In ecovillages, a person on a bicycle is not a cost—they are an investment. Every hour saved becomes community care, local resilience, and new initiatives. Sometimes, a bicycle doesn’t just shorten a journey. It creates the time needed to build a stronger community. #Cycling #Ecovillages #RuralMobility #CommunityDevelopment #Regeneration #WomenLeadership

Kyiv 05.08.2026 Never stop speak about Ukraine 🇺🇦 Not only Palestyne. #StandWithUkraine

My garden therapy looks like this. What does yours look like? 🥒🌿 For me, gardening is no longer about maximizing harvests. It’s about protecting my mental health. I grow just a few beds of cucumbers, some blueberries, and a handful of apple trees. The harvest is modest—and that’s exactly what I want. A large harvest also means more work: processing, preserving, storing. Right now, my life is focused on other responsibilities, and I don’t need another source of pressure. Many friends of mine are committed to producing as much of their own food as possible, and I truly admire that. My path is different. I practice what I call interval garden therapy. I don’t serve the garden on a fixed schedule. I go there only when I have the time, energy, and desire. The garden adapts to my rhythm, not the other way around. In a world filled with constant stress, information overload, and uncertainty, working with soil has become one of my ways to regain clarity and balance. The greatest value of my garden is not measured in kilograms of vegetables. It’s measured in peace of mind. Perhaps the hardest lesson is accepting that we don’t always need more. Sometimes we simply need enough. How do you restore your mental balance? Do you have your own version of “garden therapy”? #MentalHealth #Gardening #Wellbeing #Regeneration #SimpleLiving

🌱 Ukrainian Climate Network Gathering It took us quite a while to get here as GEN Ukraine: voting, interviews, and a values alignment process. And now our ecovillage network has become part of the Ukrainian Climate Network — a community of 42 environmental organizations. This weekend was incredibly intense. We talked about organizational development, mapping networks, cooperation, communities, technology, climate trends and the future of the environmental movement. I found myself in a room where I was far from the most competent person — and I really enjoyed listening to colleagues with much deeper experience. Some say the environmental movement is getting older. I disagree. I saw many young, energetic faces with ideas and ambitions. I felt among my people. We discussed a solarpunk future, working with communities and government, resisting neocolonial approaches, entering the international arena as equals, and promoting our own Ukrainian expertise. For me, this was a perfect continuation of the European Ecovillage Gathering: first the European context, then a deep dive back into our Ukrainian reality. Many environmental leaders are now at the frontline, volunteering, or abroad. Climate may seem “not the priority” during the war — yet a lot is happening beneath the surface. @gen_ukraine is part of this movement too. Thank you to everyone who keeps this work alive — and to Tepla Hora for the warm welcome. 🌾 #ClimateAction #Ukraine #Ecovillages #GENUkraine #Solarpunk

What if we redesigned open-source wind turbines for the realities of 2026 — and wartime Ukraine? 🌬️🌱 At the GEN Gathering Expo I discovered the classic Hugh Piggott open-source wind turbine. Its complete engineering manual—with drawings, blade templates and construction guidelines—remains one of the best examples of open-source hardware for community energy. (Engineering For Change) But it made me realize something. The challenge today is no longer the turbine itself. Fifteen years ago, many ecovillages had large communities, workshops and volunteers who could spend days hand-winding generators and building every component from scratch. Most Ukrainian ecovillages don’t. Because today we are living in wartime conditions. Many people have left, others are serving, and communities simply don’t have enough hands or time to build complex systems from zero. Today we need modular, repairable systems that can be assembled by a small team using ready-made generators, LiFePO₄ batteries, hybrid inverters and smart controllers. But the real innovation is digital. Imagine every turbine connected to smart meters, an Impact Dashboard, and ReFi infrastructure. Energy production, CO₂ reductions and ecosystem impact would be verified automatically, aggregated across the entire network and used to support tokenization, climate reporting and regenerative funding. Instead of building a single turbine, we could create an open GEN Turbine Kit—a shared standard that combines open engineering, digital monitoring and regenerative finance. Sometimes innovation isn’t about inventing something new. It’s about adapting the best open-source ideas to the realities communities face today.

Need your voices

What should we bring to the European Ecovillage Gathering 2026? In just a week, we will travel to GEN Gathering 2026 in Germany. Before every gathering, I find myself asking the same question: What are we bringing with us? Not in terms of presentations or reports. But who are we today within the European ecovillage movement? Are we an interesting Ukrainian phenomenon? A community surviving through war? Another grant recipient? Or are we becoming a strategic partner capable of contributing something unique to the entire network? This was exactly the question we discussed during our coordination call on Friday while preparing for the gathering. For many years, we talked about European integration—how Ukrainian communities could join international networks, build partnerships, and receive support. Today, that framework feels too narrow. Despite all the internal challenges we continue to face, we are no longer standing at the doorstep. We have already become part of a shared European—and increasingly global—ecosystem. Over the past two years, GEN Ukraine has joined initiatives such as Horizon Europe, Ma Earth, CISU, GEN Netherlands, Artizen, Web3 Institute, Octant, Localism Fund, and Grassroots Economics. We have also developed our own fundraising infrastructure and supported dozens of regenerative initiatives across our network. This is no longer about securing another grant or attending another international event. It is about co-creating solutions. Europe does not simply need more Ukrainian ecovillages. Like Ukraine, it needs partners who can help address real challenges: regenerating degraded landscapes, climate adaptation, bioregional governance, digital monitoring of natural capital, innovative climate finance, and meaningful community engagement. These are exactly the areas where GEN Ukraine has been building practical experience. We are testing digital ecosystem monitoring, experimenting with ReFi and environmental impact tokenization, organizing regenerative community projects, and connecting local communities with international research and funding programs. In many ways, we are already helping build new European value chains. Donor → International Fund → GEN Europe → GEN Ukraine → Local Ecovillage → Regenerative Action → Digital Monitoring → Climate Finance Or: University → Horizon Europe → Researchers → Ukrainian Ecovillages → Field Data → New Methodologies → European Policies To me, this is what modern partnership looks like. Not one side constantly helping the other. But every partner taking responsibility for part of the shared work. That is why I find myself speaking less about Ukraine integrating into GEN Europe and more about sharing competencies. I see the future of GEN Europe as a network of complementary expertise, where every national network contributes its strongest capabilities. Ukraine can become one of the network’s centers of expertise in regenerative land restoration during crisis, digital natural capital monitoring, ReFi, climate finance, and resilient community development. Perhaps the key question is no longer: “How can Ukraine integrate into GEN Europe?” But rather: “What unique role can GEN Ukraine play for the entire European network?” I believe that is the question worth bringing with us to Germany this year.

“If you think you’re the smartest person in the room, you’re in the wrong room.” That’s exactly why I sometimes choose to step outside my own bubble. Yesterday I attended a session with Ukrainian marketing strategist Yurii Hladkyi. We’ve known each other for years, but every time I’m impressed by how quickly he brings clarity into complex ideas. I also had a chance to introduce what we’re building at GEN Ukraine. It was an interesting exercise because we’re not a traditional business. I had to translate our work into the language of marketing. So what is our product? Before the presentation, I even asked AI for advice. The answer was surprisingly simple. Our product is stories. We create stories of transformation and turn them into grants, Web3 fundraising, international partnerships, and trust. We don’t sell physical products. We build a network of ecovillages, tokenize ecological restoration, solar energy, biodiversity, and community action, and develop digital infrastructure to measure climate impact. The most valuable part of the event wasn’t the answers—it was the questions. What problem do you solve? Who are your competitors? Why should people choose you? Could your organization run for a month without you? What’s your main growth channel? Have you clearly communicated your value? Those questions are just as relevant for nonprofits as they are for businesses. Lately I’ve been overwhelmed by coordination, grant reporting, governance, and daily operations. It’s easy to lose sight of the bigger picture. This conversation reminded me that for almost twenty years we’ve been building something much larger than individual projects. First communities. Then a national network. Then international partnerships. Then Web3 infrastructure. Then digital systems for verifying environmental impact. Only after trying to explain it in three minutes did I realize that all of this is actually one product. One more idea stayed with me. AI will automate content, advertising, and many online activities. But the value of what cannot be automated will continue to grow: Real people. Real communities. Real stories. Trust. Long-term partnerships. We rarely sell a product. We sell a vision of the future. And our real value depends on whether we can actually build that future. When the audience responded with “Wow,” I realized something I often forget. Over the past eight years, we’ve created an entirely new ecosystem that can attract international funding and create measurable environmental impact. From an entrepreneurial perspective, that’s a significant achievement. Thank you, Yurii, for raising the bar once again. Back to work. #Marketing #Leadership #Strategy #Web3 #ClimateAction #Regeneration #SocialImpact #GENUkraine

Small achievements matter too. 🌿 Following #URC2026 in Gdańsk has inspired me to share what’s happening at the micro level of our network of small ecovillages in Ukraine. Here is a short update. We have just received a €5,000 grant from GEN Netherlands (thank you for the quick support!) to co-fund several seasonal community projects, including Stezhka and MaystryMy. It arrived exactly when we needed it and will help us move through this season with greater stability. We have also been selected for several international funding programs. 🌱 @maearthstudio Earth Round 3 – a Web3 funding round for soil regeneration, supported by New Zealand’s Biome Trust. Funding range: 2,000–15,000 USDC. We were selected from more than 800 applicants. Community voting starts on July 1, and I’ll soon invite everyone to support our proposal. 🌐 @Binance Web3 Resilience Lab – the Ukrainian edition. 12,500 USDC funding pool. Public voting is open until July 20. We are currently among the leading projects and have collected 33 of the 100 votes required. Here we are presenting our Web3 Eco Impact Dashboard—a platform for tokenizing the environmental impact of small communities and ecovillages. 🌳 @Artizen – another Web3 platform supporting nature regeneration projects, with grants ranging from 2,000 to 6,000 USDC. This funding season ends in about two weeks, so we’re keeping our fingers crossed for the results. This is what a blended funding economy looks like in practice. A few years ago, it was difficult to imagine this model. Instead of relying on a single major donor or grant, we are building our financial resilience through multiple complementary funding streams. One program supports land regeneration, another invests in digital infrastructure, another helps community initiatives or seasonal activities. And this comes in addition to our ongoing partnership with the Danish CISU fund, with whom we have been working continuously since around 2019. For a relatively small network of ecovillages, this diversified micro-funding approach is proving to be remarkably resilient. It provides flexibility for both strategic planning and day-to-day operations while allowing us to strengthen the organization itself and invest directly in the initiatives of our member communities. If you would like to support our work directly, we have also launched our own fundraising platform, Pomistya Club. I’ll share the link in the comments. #UkraineRecovery #URC2026 #Regeneration #Ecovillages #Web3 #ReFi #ClimateAction #CommunityDevelopment #SoilRegeneration #ImpactFinance

Glad to see our recent podcast on @CryptoAltruism and the launch of our Regen Bank fork added some momentum to this exact discussion 😉 Heavy bureaucracy in dMRV kills grassroots impact. In crisis conditions or with closed land registries, standard paperwork simply fails. Structuring claims directly at the source and focusing on territory stewardship rather than paper titles is exactly what we are already implementing for @GEN_Ukraine communities. Looking forward to seeing how the main protocol adapts! 🛠️🌍