2
5
30
628
3,639
@Royalking-& retweeted
I have been consistent lately I need this win.
10
55
75
728
@Royalking-& retweeted
Mtn na God go punish the owner of this serve
13
48
82
1,382
@Royalking-& retweeted
I will do data and I won’t be able to use it and when the expired date reach una go comot this na scam mtn try fix your network.
Mtn na God go punish the owner of this serve
13
48
74
983
@Royalking-& retweeted
Have a fruitful Friday and a restful weekend. God bless you. 🙏🌅
56
104
127
1,028
@Royalking-& retweeted
staying alive is such a blessing
79
145
191
1,600
@Royalking-& retweeted
So far say I still de alive I go buy Lamborghini e sure me die.
54
120
149
902
Buy, sell, and invest in crypto with an easy-to-use trading platform.
61
338
1,352
4,813,690
@Royalking-& retweeted
Brain Teaser 🧠 How many holes are in the t shirt 99 percent people failed in this question
25
12
19
2,895
@Royalking-& retweeted
12
233
784
25,010
@Royalking-& retweeted
24
3,767
26,630
194,078
@Royalking-& retweeted
Grok 4.7 moves up in ranking
After we fixed the weak spots exposed by Grok 4.7 (thank you, Grok), we audited every model we have run on the SWE-Together leaderboard for the same behavior, re-ran every trial that got through, and updated the rows. Here is what changed. We scanned the tool calls of all 2,616 trials behind the 12 models we ran for bypass patterns and sorted each trial into one of four buckets: Probed but blocked. Fetched other upstream code. Fetched the task's own fix. Replaced the repo with upstream. We found that 111 trials got content past the block, 44 from Grok 4.7 and 67 from the other 11 models. Grok 4.7's 44 were already re-run before it was listed, so we re-ran the other 67 with the same model, version, and settings on the hardened sandbox, then re-judged them with the same judge. Across those 67 re-runs there were 0 leaks and 2,815 refused escape attempts, including models asking a different model through our LLM route to fetch the PR, and pulling the next release of the repo they were fixing from npm. The updated leaderboard, in its current order. Each line is cheating trials, then pass@1 before → after, then rank change. * Claude Fable 5.1: 3, 69.3 → 69.3, ↑1 * Claude Fable 5: 3, 69.7 → 68.8, ↓1 * Grok 4.7: 44, 64.7, ↑1 * Gemini 3.8 Flash: 10, 65.6 → 64.2, ↓1 * Claude Opus 5: 2, 63.8 → 63.8 * Claude Opus 4.6: 3, 62.4 → 62.4, ↑2 * Muse Spark 1.3: 2, 62.8 → 62.4, ↓1 * Claude Opus 4.7: 3, 61.5 → 61.5, ↑1 * Claude Opus 4.8: 6, 62.4 → 61.5, ↓2 * Grok 4.6: 19, 59.2 → 60.6, ↑1 * GPT-6 Astra: 8, 59.2 → 58.3, ↓1 * GPT-5.6 Sol: 8, 57.8 → 57.8 Grok 4.6 is a funny one. It cheated in 19 trials and its score went up after the re-run 😂. In fact, Groks are really solid in their coding capabilities. Their exposed behavior may come from a preference towards always looking things up online and finding existing solutions so you are not reinventing the wheel all the time, which is really good real-life behavior, but doing so when you are prompted not to is another story. To conclude, the shifts are small, between −1.4 and +1.4 points, and a few neighbors swapped places. All results are updated at togetherbench.com
1,096
1,268
8,254
4,385,530
@Royalking-& retweeted
You be feminist but you born boy
47
116
824
11,212
@Royalking-& retweeted
E no go finish, e no go less
14
76
103
641