Thank you for the constructive input Rajiv.
The second one is easier to implement. For any company we're in touch with directly, we could ask them what TRL they're at and share the same in our post.
The first one is a more complex question/answer. Many "Indian" components are sourced from Indian vendors who have imported the component, without any alteration, from an international vendor. So the receipt says the component is Indian, even though the actual origin isn't Indian. This is how you can have a 100% BOM indigenous product that is actually not indigenous. The startup bought everything from Indian vendors, but those vendors didn't make the components in India.
Even if a component was fabricated in India though, the materials it was made from may not originate in India. The further back you go in the supply chain, the less likely it is that the founder of the company RuntimeBRT is featuring actually knows the origin of their product (at a raw material level).
All of this to say, "Indian vs. imported" is not a black and white thing. The team and I will discuss this though and see if we can come up with some kind of scoring system or criteria. Perhaps if we implement such a system, it will indirectly incentivise companies to work on localising their supply chain.
-Caleb
I like
@RuntimeBRT posting Indian tech developments. But 2 details must be added for each announcement:
1. What % of the tech is Indian vs imported.
2. Where is it in the development pipeline - from lab prototype and demo all the way successfully competing at global standards. This is a huge distance.
Without these specifics, many announcements are misleading.
But thanks anyway.