Old earth creationists either rely on outside authorities & eisegesis or run away. They can never show from the Bible that the Earth is old
15
1
20
895
I'm not necessarily an "old world creationist" but I both accept the obviousness of evolution and an old world, and the possibility of a recent creator.
The Bible allows for both.
The Bible doesn't require that the earth LOOKS like it was created 6000 years ago.
1
35
Like how literally every line of evidence converges on the same ~4.5 Billions years for the age of the earth and evolution.
Endogenous retroviral insertions alone have no good creationist rebuttal.
3
29
ERVs?!?!? 🙄
You are in for some education. If you need more education, ask @SFT_Ministries
youtu.be/b4wjQfc2hH8
1
1
60
We have books, videos, debates, presentations and published peer reviewed papers on ERVs from the creationists view. More than enough for a skeptic
1
1
39
Give me the crux of your argument.
1. Are you claiming that sequences of LTR-gag-pol-env-LTR are not retroviral insertions?
1
36
Non-created/acquired ERVs are primarily the unfixed, polymorphic elements that differ among individuals or populations. These are accepted as genuine later retroviral insertions arising from exogenous viral activity after creation.
Sep 28, 2026 · 9:21 PM UTC
1
65



