Health and Safety Consultant Former member of the CATA Exec Team. (CATA has now stood down, following completion of its role in the Inquiry Module 3:Healthcare)
South West England
- Tweets 2,779
- Following 0
- Followers 1,776
- Likes 3,863
Pinned Tweet
Here we go again!
The Anti-Aerosol brigade rides again!
'Airbrushes to the ready - Charge!
2
19
69
2,507
David Osborn retweeted
In the UK, those leading the pandemic response knowingly and deliberately lied that SARS2 was spread by droplet. They told HCWs they would be safe wearing FRSMs. The cover-up continues to this day.
You can read about the scandal in press release linked below…
CATA (Covid Airborne Transmission Alliance) has today issued this press release ahead of next Thursday's publication of the Inquiry's module 3 report:
tinyurl.com/CATA-press-relea…
1
3
5
68
Cat exposes just one aspect of NHS Scotland/ARHAI utter incompetence.
Believe me, there are many others!
See CATA's report tinyurl.com/CATA-rpt-2
Section 11: "ARHAI Uncloaked"
& section 10.
Section 2 (2.3 in particular) is worth reading too - questions ARHAI credibility.
This sentence in NHS Scotland’s new IPC guidance is a damning illustration of the sheer incompetence & ignorance of those who wrote it:
“RPE should never be worn by an infectious person as the respirator filters incoming air & not the air being expelled by the wearer”
❌ WRONG!
2
9
19
966
So the deeper question for NHS Scotland and Wales is this:
Why are you allowing an HCW to provide close-quarter care to patients if they are infected with a pathogen like SARS-COV-2 in the first place?
This has potential to cause patients serious harm (both acute and chronic).
1
3
11
198
David Osborn retweeted
This sentence in NHS Scotland’s new IPC guidance is a damning illustration of the sheer incompetence & ignorance of those who wrote it:
“RPE should never be worn by an infectious person as the respirator filters incoming air & not the air being expelled by the wearer”
❌ WRONG!
27
115
339
24,947
David Osborn retweeted
CATA Exec team forensic analysis/FoI show IPC Cell mtg minutes were EDITED to remove:
precautionary approach consensus &
FFP3 masks👇🏼
#Accountability #Liability #HCW @GourlaySyd @Starseeker1986 @alitwy @cv_cev @BarryHunt008 @ZeroCovidScot @1goodtern @BehindWards @mdc_martinus
Here’s the link to the two sets of minutes from the IPC Cell meeting on 22 Dec 2020:
1. Original draft minutes (obtained by FOI, but seemingly never disclosed to the Inquiry):
ia801407.us.archive.org/23/i…
2. Final AMENDED minutes (disclosed to the Inquiry):
covid19.public-inquiry.uk/wp…
1
6
12
410
David Osborn retweeted
VACCINE COST-EFFECTIVENESS
I want to talk about vaccine cost-effectiveness analysis & the methods used to determine eligibility for various vaccines.
You might think there’d be a consistent methodology for this important analysis…
…but apparently not.
Let’s dig into it… 🧵
6
39
97
7,630
David Osborn retweeted
According to the revised Scottish infection & prevention control manual for healthcare workers ""RPE [FFP3] should never be worn by an infectious person as the respirator filters incoming air and not the air being expelled by the wearer." 🧵
18
21
99
7,528
Oh, and who issued/authorised the IPC guidance to NHS/PHE 12/3/2020 which implemented the downgrade from FFP3 to FRSM for frontline HCWs?
tinyurl.com/CATA-rpt-1
See section 3.2 'Timeline' 12 March
2
11
27
604
David Osborn retweeted
What defence?
The guidance was wrong
AGPs as a risk factor was nonsense
ICUs as the highest risk place, wrong
Sockpiles poor/unavailable
Engineered IPC absent
Droplets were fantasy land
Post exposed/infected care HCW abysmal
Honesty to HCWs non-existent
Apologies non existent
1
29
79
1,240