This deserves a read and some contemplation—of our own selves as well as of the society we are part of.
I kept wondering, after reading it, if the Church herself has some kind of rite of passage for young men, as one major, individual act.
Unless they become priests, I don't think it does—and then, in the Orthodox Church, they must marry first and then become priests, if they are to marry at all.
I think the baptism itself serves as the most authentic rite of passage, as it contains the whole ritual of abandoning the life of sin and the demons of one's passions and heresies and putting on the clean garment of Christ. But, while this may happen as adults for those who convert, it happens as babies for the cradle Orthodox, when the godparents are witnesses and stand in promise for the new soul thus entrusted to God.
I wonder if the frequent sacrament of confession, which is recommended to start roughly at the age the conscience is developed enough (around 7), and in which baptism is being renewed through tears of repentance and the soul begins a lifelong routine of cleansing, standing in front of the Lord and His humble witnesses, might not serve as the quintessential, continuous rite of passage.
Shaped thus through repentance and participation in the sacramental life of the Church, men become fully men, the image of Christ being clarified in them—the priesthood of the lay men, called to lead their households to Christ, being their ultimate calling.
I think this would prove that Daniel's arguments in his article have a solid ground: it's the culture.