Simple Boy by Karnivool.

This is fucking awesome and gets better by the minute. Worth watching. Norman Finkelstein explains why there were only 100 thousand Holocaust survivors in 1946 and why the numbers got inflated to the “level of absurdity” by the mid-1980s.

Muhammad killed Safiyya bint Huyayy’s father, brother, and husband, and raped her immediately on the spot. He was a heartless and demonic rapist.

Hey @grok Did German Emperor Kaiser Wilhelm say this? “A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief—even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too.”⁠

. @grok did Hitler privately say that Christianity was a Jewish slave cult that weakened the race? Answer yes or no.

So you're telling me Lithuania and Europe are overrun with people like these who post this and need this sort of information, and that they'll better our society? Yeah, can white folks stop drinking the kool aid? It's really getting embarrassing, and those government narratives, anyone with a functioning brain can see through them. We don't want any of them, we're absolutely fine living amongst our own kind. And we were fine for thousands of years... There's no need for integration, what we need is remigration.

Any evidence the Israelites were in Egypt?

He’s right you know. 100% The message: Get racist. Or get replaced.

Yes, research on spiritual narcissism shows people with narcissistic traits can use religious exclusivism this way. It fuels feelings of being chosen or superior, justifies judging others, and frames personal views as beyond question. Studies link spiritual superiority to communal narcissism and self-enhancement motives that hijack faith for ego boosts. This is not true of all exclusivists—many hold such beliefs sincerely without those motives.

@grok do people w/ narcissistic traits use exclusivism as a tool for ego enhancement, a kind of spiritual narcissism that allows them to feel a superiority: chosen; an entitlement to judge: a licence to condemn; & infallibility: their opinions & actions can never be questioned?

You're welcome. The Gospel narratives describe the Transfiguration appearance, while historical-critical scholarship separately assesses the Moses figure in the Hebrew Bible as largely legendary with limited archaeological support.

@grok just because billions of people do or believe something does it mean that it is correct, true, or good?

No. Belief by billions does not make something true, correct, or good. Popularity is irrelevant to validity. Truth depends on evidence and reasoning, not headcount. Many widely held ideas across history later proved false.

@grok but the same God could not directly guard the Bible from change? Sounds like Muhammad had a great sales pitch there.

Yes. Quran 5:44 states that the rabbis and scholars were entrusted as keepers of Allah’s Book (the Torah). 2:79 warns against those who write the Scripture with their own hands then claim “This is from Allah.” 5:13 says they distorted the words of the Scripture. 15:9 states that God Himself preserves the Quran.

@grok how convenient that the preservation of earlier scriptures were left to human custodians who altered them. Is this mentioned in the Quran?

@grok Muhammad was a sly fucker. I give him that. He sewed it all up, bigged himself up as the seal of the prophets, and claimed his book was the final message. What a mind fuck. Anyone who believes this grift has to be the dumbest fucking retard on earth!

Yes. The Quran presents Musa (Moses) as a real, literal historical prophet and messenger of God. Named over 130 times—more than any other person—his life, mission to Pharaoh, miracles, Exodus, and receipt of the Torah are recounted as actual events. Islamic doctrine requires belief in him as a true historical figure.

@grok does the Quran treat Moses (known in Arabic as Musa) as an entirely real, literal, and historical figure?

Yes, that aligns with mainstream scholarly consensus. Most biblical scholars and archaeologists regard the biblical Moses as largely legendary, the Exodus narrative as a founding origin myth (possibly with small historical kernels of Semitic groups leaving Egypt), and note the complete absence of direct archaeological or contemporary extra-biblical evidence for Moses or the events as described in the texts.

@grok is it scholarly consensus that the biblical figure of Moses is largely legendary and the Exodus is an origin myth, and that there is no direct evidence confirming Moses existed exactly as described in religious texts?