50 BC: the tallest men a Roman legion ever faced were the Germans and the Celts, and they lived on the herd. Caesar wrote it down through gritted teeth. 800: the tallest people in Europe were the Norse, and they lived on butter, cheese, fish and salt meat. 1850: the tallest people on earth were the Cheyenne and the Sioux, and they lived on bison. 1899: the shortest men in the British army came out of the mill towns, and they lived on bread, tea and jam. 1954: the shortest people in the developed world were the Japanese. Milk went into every school lunch that year and they grew 10cm inside a generation. 2000: the two Koreas shared a language, a border and a set of grandparents, and the south, on beef and eggs, stood up to 8cm above the north, on rice. 2026: the tallest people on earth are the Dutch, and they drink more milk per head than any nation alive. Height is the only nutrition survey that cannot be funded, fudged or reworded by a committee. It is taken against a wall, in front of a mother, and it has returned the same verdict on every continent for 2,000 years. The tall ones had the herd. The short ones had the field.

Sep 28, 2026 · 3:31 AM UTC

181
1,712
10,865
638,747
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @SamaHoole
The tallest people are the Dinka, followed by Nuer, Tutsi, Massai, all stock farmers.
4
2
75
6,520
Exactly. It’s remarkable how often the very tall populations turn out to be pastoralists living close to cattle, milk and meat.
2
2
65
4,703
Replying to @SamaHoole
We must ask how the 5,1 midget Julius Caesar gang-raped, butchered, and turned thousands (millions) of Gauls into his human cattle so easily? 😭😂😂😂
12
3
54
12,694
Ah yes, because military organisation, supply lines, siegecraft and political fragmentation famously count for nothing once someone mentions height.
7
3
93
6,310
Replying to @SamaHoole
Germenler ve Keltler uzun boyluydu, ama Romalılara yenildiler. Japonlar kısa boyluydu ama dünyanın en zengin milleti oldular. Kuzey Koreliler kısa boylu ama şu an tüm dünyayı tehdit ediyorlar. Kıssadan hisse: Deve de uzundur ama eşeğin peşinden yürür.
2
2
13
1,761
Rome winning wars does not make malnutrition beneficial. Japan industrialising does not make short stature optimal. North Korea having missiles does not make stunting a strength programme.
1
1
17
1,324
Replying to @SamaHoole
And Julius Caesar whipped their celtic arses
3
15
3,015
“Whipped” is generous. Gaul took eight years, enormous Roman resources, and came very close to making Caesar’s career end rather differently.
3
23
2,635
Replying to @SamaHoole
The Comanche lived on Bison. 🦬. Not tall
2
14
3,627
The existence of one bison-eating population that wasn’t exceptionally tall does not somehow erase the Cheyenne and Sioux measurements. That’s not how population evidence works.
2
1
22
3,019
Replying to @SamaHoole
It sounds like the Gauls developed muscle at the expense of brains because they were backward compared to the Romans. And they got punched.
2
14
2,035
The famous law of anthropology: taller people have less brain. Caesar will be delighted to hear Gaul was conquered by endocrinology.
1
2
916
Replying to @SamaHoole
Great points/observations. The Germanics were like an inch or two taller on average iirc. Although everytime I see an image or illustration the Celt/Germanic is trotted out like Goliath about to squash David.
1
11
4,122
That’s the funny part. The sources noticed the size difference; later artists added another foot and a bearskin.
4
2,364
Replying to @SamaHoole
being tall is not something to aspire, or is particularly beneficial. so what is your point?
6
8
2,446
The point is childhood nutrition, not winning a modelling contract. Height is simply one of the few long-term outcomes you can’t argue with.
1
21
2,039
Replying to @SamaHoole
And the short Japanese lived very long lives. Height is not an indicator of health. How often do you meet a tall person in their 80s?
1
6
1,105
Japan’s longevity doesn’t make stunting healthy any more than an 80-year-old smoker makes cigarettes medicinal.
8
984
Replying to @SamaHoole
The tallest has shortest life expectancy.
3
4
2,248
Conveniently ignores the Dutch, who are both among the tallest and among the longest-lived populations on earth.
10
2,038
Replying to @SamaHoole
yet the Romans beat the Germanic and the Celts, lesson in there
1
3
663
I don't remember the part where the Romans conquered Germania. But I do remember who sacked Rome. Twice.
1
5
719
Replying to @SamaHoole
The Romans thought of the Germanics as hearty livestock, not fit for anything but slaves. This should sound familiar
2
3
2,675
Quite. Rome’s view was basically: enormous barbarians, terrible manners, potentially excellent manpower.
1
7
2,479
Replying to @SamaHoole
Pretty sure this has more to do with terrain (you find the herds on flat land).. you need long legs to travel long distances. The more mountainous, the shorter the people, to more easily climb them.
2
3
2,140
Montenegro would like a word. Some of the tallest men on earth live in the Dinaric Alps, which are not exactly renowned for being flat.
1
9
2,004
Replying to @SamaHoole
Any relationship between being taller and higher chance of cancer?
2
1
1,364
Taller people do show somewhat higher rates of certain cancers. They also show lower mortality from several other causes. Biology remains irritatingly more complicated than “short = healthy.”
2
3
1,399