Remember how much offense Core supporters took when we called many of them CSAM supporters or pedos because they refused to acknowledge any argument with respect to limiting the ability to put CSAM on chain? All the phony, make-believe outrage and "how dare you call us names like that," and "the reason I don't support your shitfork is because you called us bad names..." Remember all that? And how they claimed no one supported CSAM, but nothing could be done, so *shrug*. Well, every now and then I get into an argument with one of these "people" (and I use that term loosely), and it turns out, they're a pedo or CSAM supporter. Isn't it interesting? Not all spam-loving, Core-supporting, BIP-110 opponents are pedos, but all pedos are spam-loving, Core-supporting, BIP-110 opponents. Funny how that works.

Sep 11, 2026 路 1:12 PM UTC

4
8
64
2,689
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @ScarcityMan
Postmodernism can be a disguise. Or not...
1
10
Replying to @ScarcityMan
The point isn't should CSAM be illegal. The point is it is illegal. Libertarians don't live in the real world. They live in fantasy land. And furthermore, filling the Blockchain with jpegs isn't what BTC was designed for. Those are 2 great reasons to limit OP_RETURN, etc
2
8
167
Replying to @ScarcityMan
Dennis06277978 sure sounds like a real person.
6
91
Replying to @ScarcityMan
thats been coretards angle for a while now. they all say "its just data"... yeh data that is stored forever on every node around the world...
3
96