I feel like Iām the only one who wasn't impressed by Figureās Helix 2.5 robot demo the other day.
Yes, I understand and appreciate that this is incredibly difficult technology to build.
But if we take a step back and just analyze it for what it is, that demo was not impressive from any practical standpoint.
That robot is still painfully, blood-boilingly slow.
Yet that wasnāt even remotely my biggest issue with the demo.
The tasks they gave these robots were ridiculously controlled in every sense of the term, while they tried to convince us they weren't.
The messes they manufactured for these robots would never be deemed a real mess in any normal high-traffic household.
The beds these robots had to make were BARELY unmade - in fact, my 12 year old would consider them already made.
You can tell that if you gave that machine a truly unmade bed (I'm talking sheets fully untucked on every corner, twisted around other blankets, etc) it would NEVER accomplish it in any acceptable way on it's own.
Everything was staged to give that robot the easiest possible version of normal low-effort household chores.
And it STILL struggled in this perfect scenario! That's what gets me the most about this demo.
The towel folding was the nail in the coffin for me in terms of any optimism I had for robotics in the near future. A towel is effectively the tutorial level of folding laundry, and it still couldnāt do it cleanly. WHAT?? Then they just moved on like nobody was supposed to notice that failure of a folding job?!
We keep seeing all these robotics demos framed as if household robots are right around the corner.
The engineering progress is impressive, sure. I totally get it.
The actual usefulness though...not even close yet.
If this is the cutting edge of household robotics in 2026, we are nowhere near TRULY replacing human capability in the home.
Not āa couple years away.ā
Nowhere near.
I'm sorry. š«