Why are people acting like P = NP because of the (possible not yet confirmed true) ETH refutation? Obviously it's important because everything that supposed ETH is now wrong, but it's nowhere near P = NP. Like not even close
Like what it really means is that linearly reducible problems to SAT are now potentially sub exponential if true but sub exponential is still much bigger than polynomial.
A lot of rubes chiming in about things they don't understand seemingly. I'm by no means a complexity expert, but even I can tell that this is not what it implies. Still very surprised that SAT could be solved in sub-exponential time though.