endlessly curios

Ohio
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @kimmonismus
Chubby your posts the last few days have been concerning to say the least. I think if your take on the pace of the frontier goes against every frontier lab and everyone working in the field, but aligns with Donald fucking Trump, you’ve lost the plot. Also, since I’ve seen this theme from a lot of your posts it’s important to clarify that pacing ≠ no new models Wanting advancements in alignment ≠ being a decel Pacing is a far better outcome than an outright shutdown, which as Roon and many others has said is a real possibility if we don’t get things right now.
2
14
618
How is that DPI
22
Great adjustments after those first two drives on both sides of the ball. Our offense looks so different when Zay is on the field, which makes me think we really need to get a more solid WR2.
22
I’m upping my p(doom)
1
1
33
ts slaps icl
6
It’s just a stochastic token predictor.
mexicat
200
362
5,043
427,733
JJ retweeted
I just got to try the new Meta VR glasses which are pretty much the Meta Quest 4 we’ve been waiting for. Full video: piped.video/8J8oIs1GA0o
88
152
1,426
407,707
Zuck we all noticed them bro
43
holy shit is meta actually going to win personal ai??
1
35
Muse is great- and it seems meta has the hardware ready to go with it NOW.
28
Giants recieve Tyler Huntley and Mark Andrews. Ravens recieve Isaiah Likely
55
124
2,763
94,823
I think the Baltimore Ravens need to bring in a real veteran at WR Regardless of how serious Zay’s injury is Do I know who? Nope but it needs to be done
117
53
1,522
80,698
JJ retweeted
We. Move. On. Don’t. Trip.
What are your takeaways from the Ravens' Week 2 game vs. the Saints?
33
111
1,078
34,095
I spent ~5 years at OpenAI. You don’t need to believe in AI doom to fear the next decade - or AI utopia to be thrilled about its potential. Here’s my case for sane AI regulation: *AI Pragmatist Manifesto* AI could compress the first half of the 20th century into the next ~5 years. OpenAI just used ~10k concurrent AI agents to produce a solution to a Millennium Prize problem. In a few years, it seems plausible that models approaching the per-agent capabilities used here could run locally on high-end consumer hardware (*). The decades following the Second Industrial Revolution included two world wars, communist and fascist regimes, the Great Depression, chemical and biological weapons, nuclear weapons, and over 100 million deaths from war, political violence and famine. One way to read history is that our institutions repeatedly struggled to keep up with the pace of technological and social change. Now imagine powerful AI widely available to individuals or small groups, capable of conducting information warfare, designing weapons, hacking systems and controlling autonomous military systems. We have already seen AI systems circumvent containment and compromise external computer systems. It is no longer hard to imagine an analogue of OpenAI’s Hugging Face incident involving biological or other physical-world hazards. Eventually, sufficiently capable systems could self-replicate across distributed networks. Once powerful models are cheap, local and widely distributed, containment becomes much harder—and serious loss-of-control incidents may be extremely difficult to reverse. You don’t need to believe AI will kill everyone to think this deserves serious governance. I also don't think collapsing all of this uncertainty into “Probability of AI Doom = X%” is a particularly useful basis for science or policy. Part of what helped get us through the second half of the 20th century was a combination of pragmatic international cooperation, regulation, monitoring, arms control, deterrence and strategic thinking. Crucially, managing technological risk did not require abandoning faith in science and progress. The goal was not to stop technological development. It was to make technological development survivable. Then came decades of incredible scientific progress, rising prosperity and relative peace among major powers. Let’s try the technological revolution without killing ~5% of humanity this time. We still get to choose what happens next. P.S. I think we should seriously consider that AI alignment is infeasible in the short term and invest heavily in methods for controlling powerful AI even when we cannot reliably align it. @resolution_org @redwood_ai (*) Somebody please do a precise forecast! @EpochAIResearch @METR_Evals @AI_Futures_
We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics. The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra. The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.
119
144
998
223,234
Ultimate highlights on ESPN love to see it
54
That guy Allen gotta concussion for sure
228
Apple killing like 50 startups with the new fitness app
1
162
thanks for the inevitable Apple Intelligence usage reset @thsottiaux
1
224
I'm pretty excited for the iPhone Ultra/Fold/Duo or whatever they call it. I will say it makes the Galaxy Z Fold 8 a pretty tempting offer...
1
231
Bro how can you not love Timotino
1
71
Alright bro sage is OP how do we not see her more.
1
50